Quo Vadis Croatia? The Interplay of Institutions, Interests and Ideas

  • Zdravko PetakEmail author
  • Kristijan Kotarski
Part of the New Perspectives on South-East Europe book series (NPSE)


The first half of our final chapter gives a brief overview of previous chapters. On the other hand, the second half deals with institutions, interests and ideas and how they mutually interact. This is important since underperforming institutions serve as one of key ingredients for explaining economic stagnation and divergence in Croatia. But what explains the emergence of these ill-suited institutions? We add interests and dominant ideas to our debate. We claim that EBRD data, which we use at length, largely explain that interests alone cannot provide the full explanations of Croatia’s institutional and economic underperformance, despite their importance. Ideas matter a lot in that regard. Even more, they matter when we observe the potential avenue for change in Croatia. Fresh ideas might spearhead the reconceptualization of vested interests and unlock institutional gridlock.


SOEs State-owned Enterprises (SOEs) Croatian National Bank (CNB) Monetary policyMonetary Policy Public Debtpublic Debt Interest Groupsinterest Groups 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., & Trebbi, F. (2006). Who Adjust and When?: The Political Economy of Reforms. IMF Staff Papers, 53(Special issue), 1–29.Google Scholar
  3. Bićanić, I. (2017). Agrokor čeka spora i bolna smrt!Na poslovni slom kompanije Vlada odgovara državnim kapitalizmom Potpuno krivo! Jutarnji list. Downloaded 22 April 2017.
  4. Blyth, M. (2002). Institutions and Ideas. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and Methods (pp. 292–311). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Blyth, M. (2008). The Secret Life of Institutions: On the Role of Ideas in Evolving Economic Systems. Revue de la Régulation, Capitalisme, Institutions, Pouvoirs, No. 3/4. Downloaded 3 October 2017.
  6. Buckley, N. (2017). Crisis at Croatia’s Agrokor Poses Threat Beyond Creditors, The Financial Times. Downloaded 13 April 2017.
  7. DZS (Državni zavod za statistiku). (2008). Persons in Paid Employment, by Activities. Priopćenje. Downloaded 2 October 2017.
  8. DZS (Državni zavod za statistiku). (2011). Persons in Paid Employment, by Activities. Priopćenje. Downloaded 2 October 2017.
  9. EBRD. (2017a). Life in Transition Survey III: A Decade of Measuring Transition. Downloaded 24 June 2017.
  10. EBRD. (2017b). Life in Transition Survey II: After the Crisis. Downloaded 24 June 2017.
  11. EBRD. (2017c). Life in Transition Survey I: A Survey of People’s Experiences and Attitudes. Downloaded 24 June 2017.
  12. Eurostat. (2017). Government Finance Statistics (EDP and ESA 2010). Downloaded 25 September 2017.
  13. Franić, J. (2012). Zapošljavanje na lokalnoj razini u Republici Hrvatskoj tijekom gospodarske krize. Institut za javne financije, Downloaded 2 October 2017.
  14. Gould, E. D., & Hijzen, A. (2017). In Equality, We Trust. Finance & Development, 54(1), 37–39.Google Scholar
  15. HumanProgress. (2017). Your Life in Numbers: A Project of HumanProgress. Downloaded 2 October 2017.
  16. LGI. (2016). The Legatum Prosperity Index. Downloaded 2 October 2017.
  17. North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodrik, D. (2014). When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sabatier, P. A. (1991). Political Science and Public Policy. PS: Political Science and Politics, 24(2), 144–147.Google Scholar
  20. Šonje, V. (2017). Agrokor prvi dio: veličina i ekonomski učinak. Downloaded 22 April 2017.
  21. WGI (Worldwide Governance Indicators). (2017). Interactive Data Access. Downloaded 24 September 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Political ScienceUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations