Abstract
This paper applied the embodiment theory of metaphor to the study of linguistic synaesthesia. In particular, we tried to account for the distribution of synaesthetic uses of Mandarin adjectives for taste and smell in terms of the degree of embodiment of different bodily experiences. We have found that taste is involved frequently both as the source domain and as the target domain in linguistic synaesthesia of Mandarin adjectives, while smell is productive only as the target domain. Besides, the synaesthetic transfer from taste to smell has also been attested to be more predominant than the transfer in a reverse direction, i.e., from smell to taste. We have thus proposed that a finer-grained theory of embodiment is sorely needed to account for the subtle differences in synaesthetic patterns of taste and smell in Mandarin adjectives. That is, the degree of embodiment is not only relevant in terms of the traditional dichotomy of bodily versus non-bodily events in the embodiment theory. The degree of embodiment is also a crucial concept to differentiate physiologically-based events such as those involving sensory modalities, which thus should also be taken into consideration in the theory of embodiment.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Caballero, R., Paradis, C.: Making sense of sensory perceptions across languages and cultures. Functions of Language 22(1), 1-19 (2015).
Che, W., Li, Z., Liu, T.: LTP: A Chinese language technology platform. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations, pp. 13-16 (2010).
Chen, K.-J., Huang, C.-R., Chang, L.-P., Hsu, H.-L.: Sinica corpus: Design methodology for balanced corpora. In: Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 11), pp. 167-176 (1996).
Chou, Y.-M., Huang, C.-R.: Hantology: Conceptual system discovery based on orthographic convention. In: Huang, C.-R., Calzolari, N., Gangemi, A., Lenci, A., Oltramari, A., Prévot, L. (eds.) Ontology and the lexicon: A natural language processing perspective, pp. 122-143. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
Dong, Z., Dong, Q.: HowNet—A hybrid language and knowledge resource. In: Proceedings of Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 820-824 (2003).
Duan, Y.: Shuowenjiezizhu [Commentary on explaining graphs and analyzing characters]. Phoenix Press, Nanjing (2007 [1735–1815]).
Gibbs, J. R. W.: Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005).
Gibbs, J. R. W.: Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes 48(8), 529-562 (2011).
Johnson, M.: The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London (1987).
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980).
Lehrer, A.: Structures of the lexicon and transfer of meaning. Lingua 45(2), 95-123 (1978).
Lien, C.: Verbs of visual perception in Taiwanese Southern Min: A cognitive approach to shift of semantic domains. Language and Linguistics 6(1), 109-132 (2005).
Popova, Y.: Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia. In: Hampe, B., Grady, J. E. (eds.) From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics, vol. 29, pp. 395-419. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York (2005).
Ramachandran, V. S., Hubbard, E. M.: Synaesthesia–A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of consciousness studies 8(12), 3-34 (2001).
Seitz, J. A.: The neural, evolutionary, developmental, and bodily basis of metaphor. New Ideas in Psychology 23(2), 74-95 (2005).
Shen, Y.: Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics 8(1), 33-71 (1997).
Sweetser, E.: From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic sturture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).
Teng, N.: Metaphor and coupling: An embodied, action-oriented perspective. Metaphor and Symbol 21(2), 67-85 (2006).
Ullmann, S.: The principles of semantics. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1957).
Williams, J. M.: Synaesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language 52(2), 461-478 (1976).
Wang, Y.: The philosophical basis for cognitive linguistics: Embodied philosophy. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (bimonthly) 34(2), 82-89 (2002).
Xu, S.: Shuowenjiezi [Explaining graphs and analyzing characters]. Zhonghua Book Company, Beijing (1963 [156]).
Xu, Z.: Hanyudazidian [Great compendium of Chinese characters]. Sichuan Dictionary Publishing Company and Hubei Dictionary Publishing Company, Chengdu & Wuhan (2010).
Zhao, Q., Huang, C.-R., Long, Y.: Synaesthesia in Chinese: A corpus-based study on gustatory adjectives in Mandarin. To appear in Linguistics (2018, in press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhao, Q., Huang, CR., Lee, Ym.S. (2018). From Linguistic Synaesthesia to Embodiment: Asymmetrical Representations of Taste and Smell in Mandarin Chinese. In: Wu, Y., Hong, JF., Su, Q. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10709. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73573-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73573-3_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73572-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73573-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)