Metaphors in Chinese Accompanying Gesture Modality and Cognition

  • Dengfeng Yao
  • Minghu Jiang
  • Abudoukelimu Abulizi
  • Renkui Hou
  • Lifei Shu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10709)

Abstract

Chinese accompanying gestures are a common phenomenon in life, and native speakers of Chinese use gesture modality to express metaphors. This study analyzes metaphors in Chinese accompanying gesture modality from the perspective of cognitive linguistics and cognitive neuroscience rather than the multimodal metaphor theory. Both spoken language and accompanying gesture modalities of metaphors are integrated into discourse, indicating that metaphor creation is based on general cognitive rather than linguistic features. The case study of Chinese accompanying gestures shows that conceptual metaphors can be cognitively activated when they are not expressed in oral modality. The close interaction between modality and language indicates that metaphors are a dynamic attribute rather than a static in the physical and interactive context. The study of metaphors in accompanying gesture modality provides a specific case for further studies on metaphors and offers support for creating a non-literal language cognitive model.

Keywords

Chinese accompanying gestures metaphor cognitive linguistics cognitive neuroscience 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hu Zhuanglin. Multimodalization in Social Semiotics .Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies(in Chinese). 1 (3): 1-10(2007).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calbris G. The semiotics of French gestures. Indiana Univ Press (1990).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McNeill D. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press (1992).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Okrent A. A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (or at least give us some criteria to work with). Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 175-198(2002).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cienki A. Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap, 189-204(1998).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Müller C. Metaphors. Dead and alive, sleeping and waking. A cognitive approach to metaphors in language use. Unpublished Habilitationsschrift, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany (2004).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Núñez R, Sweetser E. Spatial embodiment of temporal metaphors in Aymara: Blending source-domain gesture with speech//7th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. 249-250(2001).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wundt W M. Völkerpsychologie; eine untersuchung der entwicklungsgesetze von sprache, mythus und sitte: Bd. Die Kunst. W. Engelmann (1908).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kendon A. Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication, 25: 207-227(1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McNeill D. So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological review, 92(3): 350(1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy G L. Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation. Cognition, 62(1): 99-108(1997).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McNeill D. Language and gesture. Cambridge University Press (2000).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldin-Meadow S. Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Harvard University Press (2005).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press (2008).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Müller C. Forms and uses of the Palm up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family. The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, 234-256(2004).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lakoff G, Turner M. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press (2009).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Forceville C. Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Psychology Press (1996).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feyereisen P. Gestures and speech, interactions and separations: A reply to McNeill (1985).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Charman T, Swettenham J, Baron-Cohen S, et al. Infants with autism: an investigation of empathy, pretend play, joint attention, and imitation. Developmental psychology, 33(5): 781(1997).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    20. Halsband U, Schmitt J, Weyers M, et al. Recognition and imitation of pantomimed motor acts after unilateral parietal and premotor lesions: A perspective on apraxia. Neuropsychologia, 39(2): 200-216(2001).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kendon A. Gesture and speech: How they interact. Nonverbal interaction, ed. by JR Wiemann & Randall Harrison. Beverly Hills (1983).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krauss R M, Chen Y, Gotfexnum R F. 13 Lexical gestures and lexical access: a process model. Language and gesture, 2: 261(2000).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kita S. How representational gestures help speaking. Language and gesture, 162-185(2000).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Ruiter J. The production of gesture and speech. Language and gesture (2000).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kendon A. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press (2004).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kita S, Özyürek A. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and language, 48(1): 16-32(2003).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kendon A. Some relationships between body motion and speech. Studies in dyadic communication, 7: 177(1972).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Levelt W. JM (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. MA: The MIT Press, Cambridge (1981).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McNeill D, Duncan S D. Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. Language and Gesture (1998).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Butterworth B, Hadar U. Gesture, speech, and computational stages: a reply to McNeill. Psychological Review, 1: 168(1989).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen Hua, Gu Yan, Zuo Han. Theories on the Relationship between gesture and speech – also on Implications for cognitive linguistics. Journal of Foreign language (in Chinese), (5): 50-58(2013).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bavelas J B, Chovil N, Lawrie D A, et al. Interactive gestures. Discourse processes, 15(4): 469-489(1992).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    McNeill D, Levy E T. Cohesion and gesture. Discourse processes, 16(4): 363-386(1993).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kendon A. Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of pragmatics, 23(3): 247-279(1995).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Müller C. Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte, Theorie, Sprachvergleich. Spitz (1998).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gibbs Jr R W, Berg E A. Mental imagery and embodied activity. Journal of Mental Imagery (2002).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Langacker R W. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2. Descriptive application (1991).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cienki A. Metaphor in the ‘‘Strict Father’’and ‘‘Nurturant Parent’’cognitive models: Theoretical issues raised in an empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2): 279-312(2005).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cienki A, Müller C. Metaphor, gesture, and thought. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 483-501(2008).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dengfeng Yao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Minghu Jiang
    • 2
  • Abudoukelimu Abulizi
    • 2
  • Renkui Hou
    • 3
  • Lifei Shu
    • 4
  1. 1.Beijing Key Lab of Information Service EngineeringBeijing Union UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Lab of Computational Linguistics, School of Humanities, Center for Psychology and Cognitive ScienceTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesthe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloonHong Kong
  4. 4.Special Education CollegeBeijing Union UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations