Advertisement

The Application of the Effective Innovation Leadership Model in ICT Practice

  • Sabrina Schork
Chapter
Part of the FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship book series (FGFS)

Abstract

This chapter examines the application of the Effective Innovation Leadership (EIL)-Model in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) practice. The EIL-Model was the outcome of a study grounded in the iteration of six different data sources. In this chapter, the focus lies on insights taken by applying the EIL-Model within three German DAX-companies from different industries. The study leads to a better understanding of the EIL-Model components and reveals that seven sub categories are dominantly affecting the effectiveness of innovation leaders. Those sub categories are openness, trust, delivery, association, perseverance, entrepreneurship, and focus.

Keywords

Leadership Innovation Change 

References

  1. Bossink, B. A. (2004). Effectiveness of innovation leadership styles: A manager’s influence on ecological innovation in construction projects. Construction Innovation, 4(4), 211–228.Google Scholar
  2. Buckingham, M., & Clifton, D. O. (2001). Now, discover your strengths. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  3. Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R., & Gefen, D. (2010). The importance of innovation leadership in cultivating strategic fit and enhancing firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 41, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gliddon, D. G. (2006). Forecasting a competency model for innovation leaders using a modified delphi technique. Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  7. Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. (2011). Leading for innovation: Direct and indirect influences. Advances in Developing Human Resource, 13, 248–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kotter, J. P. (2000). What leaders really do. The Bottom Line, 13(1).  https://doi.org/10.1108/bl.2000.17013aae.001
  9. Kaudela-Baum, S., Holzer, J., & Kocher, P.-Y. (2014). Innovation Leadership: Führung zwischen Freiheit und Norm. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Malik, F. (2014). Führen, Leisten, Leben – Wirksames Management für eine neue Welt. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  11. Murphy, E. C., & Murphy, M. A. (2002). Leading on the edge of chaos: The 10 critical elements for success in volatile times. Paramus: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 956–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Schork, S. (2014a). Arbeiten in einer innovationsgetriebenen Wirtschaft. In T. Arns, M. Bentele, J. Niemeier, P. Schütt, & M. Weber (Eds.), Zukunft der Wissensarbeit (pp. 51–58). Berlin: BITKOM.Google Scholar
  18. Schork, S. (2014b). Berufung Innovator: Wahrer des gesellschaftlichen Fortschritts. Digital Leadership Forum. Frankfurt am Main: Advantera.Google Scholar
  19. Schork, S. (2017). Wirksame Führung von Innovation – Werte, Stärken und Praktiken. Karlsruhe Institut für Technologie.Google Scholar
  20. Schork, S., & Terzidis, O. (2014). Guiding behavior favoring sustainable enterprise innovation capability. G-Forum, 18th Interdisciplinary Entrepreneurship Conference, FGF, Oldenburg.Google Scholar
  21. Schork, S., & Terzidis, O. (2015). Erfolgreiche Führungsprinzipien im Innovationsbereich. G-Forum, 19th Interdisciplinary Entrepreneurship Conference, FGF, Kassel.Google Scholar
  22. Schork, S., Heblich, B., & Terzidis, O. (2016). Effective innovation leadership. Amsterdam: University Industry Innovation Network.Google Scholar
  23. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (55th Issue). Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Trantow, S., Hees, F., & Jeschke, S. (2011). Die Fähigkeit zur Innovation – Einleitung in den Sammelband. In S. Jeschke, I. Isenhardt, F. Hees, & S. Trantow (Eds.), Enabling Innovation: Innovationsfähigkeit – deutsche und internationale Perspektiven (pp. 1–14). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HYVE - The Innovation CompanyMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations