Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Southern-Based Code of Conduct in the Global Tea Supply Chain: Implications for Sustainable Business Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Business Models

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 3130 Accesses

Abstract

In recent times, there have been an increase in the concerns about the effectiveness of the traditional business models in achieving sustainable value creation within the global supply chains. The recent scandals suggest the dominant form of maintaining their supply chain’s integrity which largely places some form of liability on the upstream suppliers for social and environmental risks may not be as effective as many scholars and practitioners may have initially conceived. In the light of this, we argue that firms may need to re-evaluate their business models and experiment with a new generations of sustainable business models: the models that call for the direct involvement of networks of stakeholders including suppliers in co-creation of sustainable value. This chapter therefore, seeks to show the processes that a Southern based upstream supplier of big western companies has undertaken in an attempt to create sustainable value. The case study company attempts to do this by developing and implementing a code of conduct based on the combined liability and shared responsibility approach with a network of its direct suppliers. The chapter concludes by drawing implications for sustainable business models within the developing country ’s context .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Eastern Produce Malawi purchases tea from these farmers who are organized in cooperatives or associations.

  2. 2.

    http://www.camellia.plc.uk/sustainability/corporate-social-responsibility

References

  • Andersen, M., & Skjoett-Larsen, T. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2016). Supplier development investment strategies: A game theoretic evaluation. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 583–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beske, P., Koplin, J., & Seuring, S. (2008). The use of environmental and social standards by German first-tier suppliers of the Volkswagen AG. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(2), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State of the art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carasco, E., & Singh, J. (2013). Human rights in the value chain. In A. Lindgreen, F. Maon, J. Vanhamme, & S. Sen (Eds.), Sustainable value chain management: A research anthology (pp. 59–72). Farnham: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén, N. (2013). Learning to improve or deceive? Chinese supplier responses to MNC codes of conduct. In A. Lindgreen, F. Maon, J. Vanhamme, & S. Sen (Eds.), Sustainable value chain management: A research anthology (pp. 309–328). Farnham: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E., et al. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, S., & Scott, D. (2002). Compliance, collaboration, and codes of labour practice: The Adidas connection. California Management Review, 45(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frostenson, M., Helin, S., & Sandström, J. (2012). The internal significance of codes of conduct in retail companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(3), 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J., Korsunova, A., & Halme, M. (2017). Our collaborative future: Activities and roles of stakeholders in sustainability-oriented innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1941

  • Høvring, C. (2017). Caught in a communicative catch-22? Translating the notion of CSR as shared value creation in a Danish CSR frontrunner. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(4), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inigo, E., Albareda, L., & Ritala, P. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Exploring evolutionary and radical approaches through dynamic capabilities. Industry and Innovation, 24, 515–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1310034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (2001). Corporate codes of conduct: Self-regulation in a global economy. Technology, business and society programme paper no. 2. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D., Handfield, R., & Tyler, B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langella, I., Carbo, J., & Dao, V. (2013). Creating socially responsible and environmentally sustainable IT-enabled supply chains. In A. Lindgreen, F. Maon, J. Vanhamme, & S. Sen (Eds.), Sustainable value chain management: A research anthology (pp. 139–152). Farnham: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepak, D., & Smith, K. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgreen, A., Xu, Y., Maon, F., & Wilcock, J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility brand leadership: A multiple case study. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 965–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, R., Kochan, T., Romis, M., & Qin, F. (2007). Beyond corporate codes of conduct: Work organization and labour standards at Nike’s suppliers. International Labour Review, 146(1–2), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueg, R., Pedersen, M., & Clemmensen, S. (2015). The role of corporate sustainability in a low-cost business model – A case study in the Scandinavian fashion industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(5), 344–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, P. (2013). Multi-stakeholder initiatives in cotton value chains: Towards a theoretical framework and a methodology. In A. Lindgreen, F. Maon, J. Vanhamme, & S. Sen (Eds.), Sustainable value chain management: A research anthology (pp. 257–270). Farnham: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: Where are we now and where are we going? Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. (2010). Global value chains, local collective action and corporate social responsibility: A review of empirical evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamic, I. (2005). Managing global chains: The sports footwear, apparel and retail sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1/2), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melissen, F., & Moratis, L. (2016). A call for fourth generation sustainable business models. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 63, 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E., & Andersen, M. (2006). Safeguarding corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: How codes of conduct are managed in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Public Affairs, 6(3–4), 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roome, N., & Louche, C. (2016). Journey towards business models for sustainability: A conceptual model found inside the black box of organizational transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 11–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Ludeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, C., Freimann, J., & Seuring, S. (2012). Business strategy at the base of the Pyramid. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrempf, J., Palazzo, G., & Phillips, R. (2013). Ever expanding responsibilities: Upstream and downstream corporate social responsibility. In A. Lindgreen, F. Maon, J. Vanhamme, & S. Sen (Eds.), Sustainable value chain management: A research anthology (pp. 353–368). Farnham: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. (2002). Corporate codes of conduct and the success of globalization. Ethics & International Affairs, 16(1), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a sustainability business model. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G., Wood, G., & Callaghan, M. (2010). A corporate model of sustainable business practices: An ethical perspective. Journal of World Business, 45, 336–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovations. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L., Butterfield, K., & McCabe, D. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviours. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Global Compact. (2013). Bangladesh tragedy reinforces need for corporate action to ensure health and safety in supply chains. Accessed May 31, 2013, from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/news/325-05-01-2013

  • Upward, A., & Jones, P. (2016). An ontology for strongly sustainable business models: Defining an enterprise framework compatible with natural and social science. Organization and Environment, 29(1), 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webley, S., & Werner, A. (2008). Corporate codes of ethics: Necessary but not sufficient. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R., & Frost, S. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Asian supply chains. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(3), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, Breda, The Netherlands

    Andrew Mzembe

Authors
  1. Andrew Mzembe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Mzembe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Antwerp Management School, Antwerp, Belgium

    Lars Moratis

  2. NHTV Breda University of Applied Science, Breda, The Netherlands

    Frans Melissen

  3. Guildhall Faculty of Business and Law, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom

    Samuel O. Idowu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mzembe, A. (2018). A Southern-Based Code of Conduct in the Global Tea Supply Chain: Implications for Sustainable Business Models. In: Moratis, L., Melissen, F., Idowu, S. (eds) Sustainable Business Models. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation