Skip to main content

Abstract

The rapid rise in the technology today has brought to limelight mobile devices which are now being used as a tool to commit crime. Therefore, proper steps need to be ensured for Confidentiality, Integrity, Authenticity and legal acquisition of any form of digital evidence from the mobile devices. This study evaluates some mobile forensic tools that were developed mainly for mobile devices memory and SIM cards. An experiment was designed with five android phones with different Operating System. Four tools were used to find out the capability and efficiency of the tools when used on the sampled phones. This would help the forensic investigator to know the type of tools that will be suitable for each phone to be investigated for acquiring digital evidence. The evaluation result showed that AccessData FTK imager and Paraben device seizure performs better than Encase and Mobiledit. The experimental result shows that, Encase could detect the unallocated space on the mobile deice but could retrieve an deleted data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Azfar, A., Choo, K.K., Liu, L.: International Conference on Multimedia Tools Applcation. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lin, C., Peng, C.: Research of digital evidence forensics standard operating procedure with comparison and analysis based on smart phone. In: Broadband and Wireless Computing Communication and Application (BWCCA), pp. 386–391. IEEE Xplore, Taiwan (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alghafi, J., Martin, M.: Forensic data acquistion methods for mobile phones. 2012 International Conference on Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, pp. 265–269. IEEE, United Arab. Emirates (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chandran, A.: Investigating and analysing malicious events in Android application. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol., 1462–1467 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ntantogian, A., Marinakis, X.: Discovering authentication credentials in volatile memory android mobile devices. Mob. Forensics, 110–117 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farjamfar, A., Mahmod, U.: A review on mobile device’s digital forensic process models. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 8(3), 358–366 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai, Y., Lin, A.: Design and implementation of mobile forensic tool for android smart phone through cloud computing. In: Design and Implementation of Mobile Forensic Tool, pp. 196–203 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kamble, J.: Digital forensic investigation procedure. Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Eng. IJARSE 4, 157–168 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aniar, R.R., Anshul, K.K., Leesha, A.: Anroid phone forensics: tools and techniques. In: International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation, ICCCA 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Padmanabhan, R., Lobo, K., Ghelani, M., Sujan, D., Mahesh, S.: Comparative analysis of commercial and open source mobile device forensic tools. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Osho, O., Ohida, A.: Comparative evaluation of mobile forensic tools. I. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci., pp. 74–83 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yusof, M., Abdullah, D.: Performance measurement for mobile forensic data acquisition in firefox OS. Int. J. Cyber-Secur. Digital Forensics (IJCSDF), 130–140 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kubi, S., Saleem, P.: Evaluation of some tools for extracting e-evidence from mobile devices. I. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci., 64–73 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mohtasebi, A., Dehghantanha, G., Broujerdi, H.: Smartphone foresics: a case study with Nokia E5-00 mobile phone. Int. J. Digital Inf. Wireless Commun. 1(3), 651–655 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Al Mutawa, N., Baggili, I., Marrington, A.: Forensic analysis of social networking applications on mobile devices. Digital Invest. 9, S24–S33 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmed, R., Dharaskar, R.V.: Mobile forensics: an overview, tools, future trends and challenges from law enforcement perspective. In: 6th International Conference on E-Governance, ICEG, Emerging Technologies in E-Government, M-Government, pp. 312–323 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support and sponsorship provided by Covenant University through the Centre for Research, Innovation and Discovery (CUCRID).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. K. Alhassan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Some of the Graphic Pictures of the Tool

Appendix: Some of the Graphic Pictures of the Tool

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alhassan, J.K., Oguntoye, R.T., Misra, S., Adewumi, A., Maskeliūnas, R., Damaševičius, R. (2018). Comparative Evaluation of Mobile Forensic Tools. In: Rocha, Á., Guarda, T. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology & Systems (ICITS 2018). ICITS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 721. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73449-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73450-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics