Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering ((BRIEFSGEOEAR))

  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

In this section, an example of a life-cycle analysis and of a resilience analysis is given for a reinforced concrete high-rise building in Bucharest. The building was designed for three levels of peak ground acceleration in order to mimic the various seismic design code generations enforced in Romania. The economic feasibility of a further increase of the design peak ground acceleration is evaluated through life-cycle analysis. This type of analysis uses as input data the losses obtained from a seismic risk analysis performed with fragility functions specifically built for the three analysed structures. The results show that both from the economic point of view and from the functionality point of view it is feasible to further increase the design peak ground acceleration from the current hazard level that corresponds to a mean return period of 225 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Burton HV, Deierlein G, Lallemant D, Lin T (2015) Framework for incorporating probabilistic building performance in the assessment of community seismic resilience. J Struct Eng 142: paper no. C4015007

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (2012) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology. Earthquake model—HAZUS MH 2.1. Technical Manual, Washington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www.rc.ace.tut.ac.jp/saito/software-e.html

  • Kappos AJ, Dimitrakopoulos EG (2008) Feasibility of pre-earthquake strengthening of buildings based on cost-benefit and life-cycle cost analysis, with the aid of fragility curves. Nat Hazards 45:33–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavel F, Vacareanu R, Calotescu I, Sandulescu AM, Arion C, Neagu C (2017) Impact of spatial correlation of ground motions on seismic damage for residential buildings in Bucharest, Romania. Nat Hazards 87:1167–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto T, Gehl P, Minas S, Galasso C, Duffour P, Douglas J, Cook O (2016) FRACAS: a capacity spectrum approach for seismic fragility assessment including record-to-record variability. Eng Struct 125:337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florin Pavel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pavel, F., Popa, V., Vacareanu, R. (2018). Case Studies. In: Impact of Long-Period Ground Motions on Structural Design: A Case Study for Bucharest, Romania. SpringerBriefs in Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73402-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics