Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attack, Interact, and Mobilize: Twitter Communication Strategies of Greek Mayors and their Effects on Users’ Engagement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sub-National Democracy and Politics Through Social Media

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 29))

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to examine the communication strategies used by Greek mayors in Twitter across different periods of an electoral cycle (pre-campaign, campaign, and post-campaign). Moreover, this study tries to delineate the effects of Twitter strategies on users’ engagement and identify the most effective ones. To that end, a content analysis is performed on 32,810 tweets of Greek mayors for a six-year period. Moreover, quantitative metrics such as the number of favorites and retweets are also obtained for each tweet. Results suggest that Greek mayors mainly use Twitter as a press release bulletin board for dissemination of information about the main events taking place in municipality. Moreover, they also use impression management strategies to promote a distinct personal, political and professional image. Results also show that during different periods of an electoral cycle mayors utilize a different mix of Twitter strategies. Furthermore, aggressive (attacking opponents), interactive (direct communication), and mobilization (requesting feedback) strategies are found to be the most effective in enhancing followers’ attitude expression (favorites) and advocacy behavior (retweets). The present study provides valuable practical implications for social media political marketers as well as politicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://140dev.com/free-twitter-api-source-code-library/twitter-database-server/

References

  • Aharony, N. (2012). Twitter use by three political leaders: An exploratory analysis. Online Information Review, 36(4), 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S., Jaidka, K., & Cho, J. (2016). The 2014 Indian elections on Twitter: A comparison of campaign strategies of political parties. Telematics and Informatics, 33(4), 1071–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barger, V. A., & Labrecque, L. I. (2013). An integrated marketing communications perspective on social media metrics. International Journal of Integrated Marketing Communications, 5(1), 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellström, P., Magnusson, M., Pettersson, J. S., & Thorén, C. (2016). Facebook usage in a local government: A content analysis of page owner posts and user posts. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(4), 548–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bene, M. (2017). Go viral on the Facebook! Interactions between candidates and followers on Facebook during the Hungarian general election campaign of 2014. Information, Communication & Society, 20(4), 513–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bode, L., & Dalrymple, K. (2016). Politics in 140 characters or less: Campaign communication, network interaction, and political participation on Twitter. Journal of Political Marketing, 15(4), 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsón, E., & Ratkai, M. (2013). A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page. Online Information Review, 37(5), 787–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011). #Ausvotes: How Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. Communication, Politics & Culture, 44(2), 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A., & Highfield, T. (2013). Political networks on Twitter: Tweeting the Queensland state election. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 667–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M., Schweickart, T., & Haase, A. (2014). Public engagement with nonprofit organizations on Facebook. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 565–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2013). Twitter use by presidential primary candidates during the 2012 campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1596–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criado, J. I., Martinez-Fuentez, G., & Silvan, A. (2012). Social media for political campaigning. The use of Twitter by Spanish Mayors in 2011 local elections. In C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance (pp. 219–232). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DePaula, N., & Dincelli, E. (2016). An empirical analysis of local government social media communication: Models of e-government interactivity and public relations. In Y. Kim & M. Liu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th international digital government research conference on digital government research (pp. 348–356). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ELTRUN. (2015). Annual survey on social networking. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from https://www.eltrun.gr/sm-survey-results-2015/.

  • Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, H. K., Cordova, V., & Sipole, S. (2014). Twitter style: An analysis of how house candidates used twitter in their 2012 campaigns. Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame, A., & Brachotte, G. (2015). Le tweet stratégique: Use of Twitter as a PR tool by French politicians. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 278–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerodimos, R., & Justinussen, J. (2015). Obama’s 2012 Facebook campaign: Political communication in the age of the like button. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gesuele, B., Metallo, C., & Agrifoglio, R. (2016). What do local governments discuss in social media? An empirical analysis of the Italian municipalities. In F. D'Ascenzo, M. Magni, & A. Lazazzara (Eds.), Blurring the boundaries through digital innovation (pp. 297–306). New York: Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the US Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1612–1621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & van’t Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: The use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2016). New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns. New Media & Society, 18(5), 765–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S., Beverungen, D., Räckers, M., & Becker, J. (2013). What makes local governments' online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikiz, Ö., Sobacı, M. Z., Yavuz, N., & Karkin, N. (2014). Political use of twitter: The case of metropolitan mayor candidates in 2014 local elections in Turkey. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 41–50). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N., & Lilleker, D. (2011). Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the use of Twitter. Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassimi, A. (2015). Half of Greeks engage in social media. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://www.ekathimerini.com/201228/article/ekathimerini/community/half-of-greeks-engage-in-social-media.

  • Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Tomasz, M. & Zajac, J. (2016). Social media actions and interactions: The role of the Facebook and Twitter during the 2014 European Parliament elections in the 28 EU nations. Retrieved from http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk.

  • Kruikemeier, S. (2014). How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lappas, G., Triantafillidou, A., Yannas, P., Kavada, A., Kleftodimos, A., & Vasileiadou, O. (2016). Social media battles: Their impact during the 2014 Greek municipal elections. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 22(3), 375–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, A. O. (2015). Pandering, protesting, engaging. Norwegian party leaders on Facebook during the 2013 ‘Short campaign’. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 459–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J., & Kenning, G. (2011). E-electioneering 2010: Trends in social media use in Australian political communication. Media International Australia, 139(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magin, M., Podschuweit, N., Haßler, J., & Russmann, U. (2016). Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269.

  • Mergel, I. (2013). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the US federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, D. (2015). Twitter and elections: Are tweets, predictive, reactive, or a form of buzz? Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 816–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, K. D. (2011). Measure what matters: Online tools for understanding customers, social media, engagement, and key relationships. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulakidakos, S., & Veneti, A. (2016). Social media in political communication: How do Greek political parties use twitter during the pre-electoral period? Work in progress. Retrieved from http://www.gpsg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Veneti-and-Poulakidakos-2015.pdf

  • Ramos-Serrano, M., Fernández Gómez, J. D., & Pineda, A. (2016). ‘Follow the closing of the campaign on streaming’: The use of Twitter by Spanish political parties during the 2014 European elections. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660730.

  • Rauchfleisch, A., & Metag, J. (2016). The special case of Switzerland: Swiss politicians on Twitter. New Media & Society, 18(10), 2413–2431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynauld, V., & Greenberg, J. (2014). Tweet, click, vote: Twitter and the 2010 Ottawa municipal election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(4), 412–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobaci, M. Z., & Karkin, N. (2013). The use of twitter by mayors in Turkey: Tweets for better public services? Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southern, R. (2015). Is web 2.0 providing a voice for outsiders? A comparison of personal web site and social media use by candidates at the 2010 UK general election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swint, K. (1998). Political consultants and negative campaigning: The secrets of the pros. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taecharungroj, V. (2016). Starbucks’ marketing communications strategy on Twitter. Journal of Marketing Communications. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2016.1138139.

  • Teperoglou, E., & Tsatsanis, E. (2014). Dealignment, de-legitimation and the implosion of the two-party system in Greece: The earthquake election of 6 May 2012. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 24(2), 222–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., Popa, S. A., & Parnet, O. (2015). A bad workman blames his tweets? The consequences of citizens’ uncivil Twitter use when interacting with party candidates. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1007–1031. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2657074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsirbas, Y. (2015). The 2014 local elections in Greece: Looking for patterns in a changing political system. South European Society and Politics, 20(1), 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010). Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 general elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D., & Williams, J. M. (2011). Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: Analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter. Journal of Public Affairs, 11(4), 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yannas, P., & Lappas, G. (2005). Web campaign in the 2002 Greek municipal elections. Journal of Political Marketing, 4(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yannas, P., Kleftodimos, A., & Lappas, G. (2011). Online political marketing in 2010 Greek local elections: The shift from web to web 2.0 campaigns. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on corporate and marketing communications (pp. 38–50).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Digital Media and Communication Department, Western Macedonia University of Applied Sciences, GR, Kastoria, Greece

    Amalia Triantafillidou, Georgios Lappas & Alexandros Kleftodimos

  2. Business Administration Department, Piraeus University of Applied Sciences, Athens, Greece

    Prodromos Yannas

Authors
  1. Amalia Triantafillidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Georgios Lappas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexandros Kleftodimos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Prodromos Yannas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgios Lappas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey

    Mehmet Zahid Sobacı

  2. Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey

    İbrahim Hatipoğlu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Triantafillidou, A., Lappas, G., Kleftodimos, A., Yannas, P. (2018). Attack, Interact, and Mobilize: Twitter Communication Strategies of Greek Mayors and their Effects on Users’ Engagement. In: Sobacı, M., Hatipoğlu, İ. (eds) Sub-National Democracy and Politics Through Social Media. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73386-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation