Abstract
In this chapter we analyze the rhetorical work of speculative design methods to advance third wave agendas in HCI. We contrast the history of speculative design that is often cited in HCI papers from the mid 2000s onward that frames speculative design as a critical methodological intervention in HCI linked to radical art practice and critical theory, with the history of how speculative design was introduced to HCI publications through corporate design research initiatives from the RED group at Xerox PARC. Our argument is that third wave, critically oriented, speculative design “works” in HCI because it is highly compatible with other forms of conventional corporate speculation (e.g. concept videos and scenario planning). This reading of speculative design re-centers the “criticality” from the method itself to its ability to advance agendas that challenge dominant practices in technology design. We will look at how practitioners trade on the rhetorical ambiguity of future oriented design practices to introduce these ideas in contexts where they may not otherwise have much purchase. Our chapter concludes with a call for critically oriented practitioners in this space to share their experiences navigating speculative design ambiguity and to document the disciplinary history of the method’s development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Knowledge Navigator Video viewable at: https://archive.org/details/youtube-hb4AzF6wEoc; Glass Video viewable at: https://archive.org/details/GoogleGlass_201307; Hololens Video viewable at: https://archive.org/details/HoloLensAd; Prime Air Videos viewable at: https://archive.org/details/AmazonPrimeAir (Accessed December 2017).
- 2.
Video viewable at: https://archive.org/details/PrimeAirVideo01 (Accessed December 2017).
- 3.
Video viewable at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFWCoeZjx8A (Accessed December 2017).
- 4.
Viewable at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qo78R_yYFA (Accessed December 2017).
References
Agre PE (1997) Computation and human experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Auger J (2013) Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digit Creat 24:11–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276
Balsamo A, Gorbet M, Harrison S, Minneman S (2000) The methods of our madness: research on experimental documents. In: CHI ‘00 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems—CHI ‘00. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, p 207
Bardzell S (2010) Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an Agenda for design. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ‘10. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, p 1301
Bardzell J, Bardzell S (2011) “Pleasure is your birthright”: digitally enabled designer sex toys as a case of third-wave HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2011), pp 257–266 . https://doi.org/cg75kh
Bardzell J, Bardzell S (2013) What is “critical” about critical design? In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ‘13 3297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466451
Bardzell J, Bardzell S (2015) Humanistic HCI. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael
Bardzell S, Bardzell J, Forlizzi J, et al (2012) Critical design and critical theory. In: Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference—DIS ’12, pp 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318001
Bell G, Dourish P (2007) Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 11:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0071-x
Blythe M (2017) Research fiction: storytelling, plot and design. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘17), pp 5400–5411
Campbell RL (1992) Will the real scenario please stand up? ACM SIGCHI Bull 24:6–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/142386.1054872
Carroll JM (2000) Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity (2016) Cybersecurity futures 2020. University of California, Berkeley
Dalton M, Gabereau A, Gallacher S, et al (2014) Quantified toilets. http://quantifiedtoilets.com. Accessed 27 July 2017
Deutsch CH (2000) The fading copier king; xerox has failed to capitalize on its own innovations. New York Times
Devendorf L (2016) Strange and unstable fabrication. University of California Berkeley, Berkeley
Devendorf L, Ryokai K (2015) Being the Machine. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ‘15. pp 2477–2486
DiSalvo C, Jenkins T, Lodato T (2016) designing speculative civics. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ‘16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 4979–4990
Dourish P (2004) What we talk about when we talk about context. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 8:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-003-0253-8
Dourish P, Bell G (2011) Divining a digital future: mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Dunne A (1999) Hertzian tales: electronic products, aesthetic experience and critical design. RCA CRD Research Publications, London
Dunne A, Gaver W (1997) The Pillow: artist-designers in the digital age. In: CHI ‘97 extended abstracts on human factors in computing. ACM Press, New York, pp 361–362
Dunne A, Raby F (2001) Design noir: the secret life of electronic objects. Birkhauser, Basel
Dunne A, Raby F (2013) Speculative everything. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Elsden C, Chatting D, Durrant AC, et al (2017) On speculative enactments. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘17). pp 5386–5399
Friedman B (1996) Value-sensitive design. Interactions 3:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/242485.242493
Gaver W (2002) Designing for homo ludens. I3 Magazine. pp 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538
Gaver W (2011) Making spaces: how design workbooks work. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘11). pp 1551–1560
Gaver B, Martin H (2000) Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘00). pp 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332433
Go K, Carroll JM (2004) The blind men and the elephant: views of scenario-based system design. Interactions 11:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/1029036.1029037
Hall S (1980) Encoding/decoding. Cult Media Lang 4:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986815
Harmon E, Mazmanian M (2013) Stories of the smartphone in everyday discourse: conflict, tension & instability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘13). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, p 1051
Harmon E, Bopp C, Voida A (2017) The design fictions of philanthropic IT: stuck between an imperfect present and an impossible future. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘17), ACM Press, New York
Harrison S, Henderson A, Minneman S et al (2001a) The what of XFR: eXperiments in the future of reading. Interactions 8:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/369825.369829
Harrison S, Minneman S, Balsamo A (2001b) The How of XFR: “eXperiments in the future of reading.”. Interactions 8:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/369825.369830
Harrison S, Tatar D, Sengers P (2007) The three paradigms of HCI. Alt Chi Sess SIGCHI …. pp 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1234/12345678
Hiltzik M (2000) Dealers of lightning: xerox PARC and the dawn of the computer age. Orion Business Books, London
Jasanoff S, Kim S-H (2009) Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47:119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
Kahn H (1962) Thinking about the unthinkable. Horizon Press, New York
Khovanskaya V, Baumer EPS, Sengers P (2015) Double binds and double blinds: evaluation tactics in critically oriented HCI. In: The fifth decennial Aarhus conference on critical alternatives (AA ‘15). p 12
Kinsley S (2010) Representing “things to come”: feeling the visions of future technologies. Environ Plan A 42:2771–2790. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42371
Lakoff A (2008) The generic biothreat, or, how we became unprepared. Cult Anthropol 23:399–428. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2008.23.3.399
Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker W, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 225–258
Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Malpass M (2016) Critical design practice: theoretical perspectives and methods of engagement. Des J 19:473–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1161943
Mankoff J, Rode JA, Faste H (2013) Looking past yesterday’s tomorrow: using futures studies methods to extend the research horizon. Chi 2013:1629–1638. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466216
Matsuda K (2016) Hyper-reality. Video. (16 May 2016). https://vimeo.com/166807261. Accessed 20 Sept 2016
Pargman D, Eriksson E, Höjer M, et al (2017) The (un)sustainability of imagined future information societies. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ‘17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 773–785
Pierce J, Sengers P, Hirsch T, et al (2015) Expanding and refining design and criticality in HCI. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘15). pp 2083–2092
Samimian-Darash L (2013) Governing future potential biothreats. Curr Anthropol 54:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/669114
Sengers P, Gaver B (2006) Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on designing interactive systems—DIS ‘06. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, p 99
Singer N (2014) Intel’s sharp-eyed social scientist. New York Times
Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, New York
Superflux (2015) Drone aviary video (7 April 2015). https://vimeo.com/124292043. Accessed 20 Sept 2011
Tanenbaum K, Tanenbaum TJ, Williams A, et al (2014) Critical making hackathon: situated hacking , surveillance. In: CHI ‘14 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (CHI EA ‘14). ACM, pp 17–20
Tognazzini B (1994) The “Starfire” video prototype project. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems celebrating interdependence—CHI ‘94. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 99–105
Vertelney L (1989) Using video to prototype user interfaces. ACM SIGCHI Bull 21:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/70609.70615
Wack P (1985) Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead. Harv Bus Rev 63:73–89. doi: Article
Wakkary R, Odom W, Hauser S, et al (2015) Material speculation: actual artifacts for critical inquiry. In: Proceedings of the 5th decennial Aarhus conference on critical alternatives (AA ‘15). vol 1, pp 97–108. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21299
Weber S (1996) Counterfactuals, past and future. In: Tetlock PE, Belkin A (eds) Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wilkinson A, Kupers R (2013) Living in the futures. Harv Bus Rev 91:119–127
Winograd T, Flores F (1987) Understanding computers and cognition. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston
Wong RY, Mulligan DK (2016a) These aren’t the autonomous drones you’re looking for: investigating privacy concerns through concept videos. J Human-Robot Interact 5:26. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.3.Wong
Wong RY, Mulligan DK (2016b) When a product is still fictional: anticipating and speculating futures through concept videos. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on designing interactive systems (DIS ‘16). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 121–133
Wong RY, Van Wyk E, Pierce J (2017) Real—fictional entanglements: using science fiction and design fiction to interrogate sensing technologies. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on designing interactive systems (DIS ‘17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 567–579
Wyche SP (2005) Designing speculative household cleaning products for older adults. In: Conference on designing for user eXperience (DUX ‘05). AIGA: American Institute of graphic arts, p 49
Acknowledgements
Thank you to Morgan Ames, Anne Jonas, Noura Howell, Nick Merrill, Tyler Fox, and Paul Duguid for their comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wong, R.Y., Khovanskaya, V. (2018). Speculative Design in HCI: From Corporate Imaginations to Critical Orientations. In: Filimowicz, M., Tzankova, V. (eds) New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2 - Methodologies . Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73373-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73374-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)