Advertisement

The Relational Turn: Third Wave HCI and Phenomenology

  • David J. GunkelEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

Third wave HCI (Human Computer Interaction) proposes an innovative method for framing human computer interactions by putting emphasis on the terms and conditions of the interactive relationship prior to determinations concerning the human subject and its computational object. As promising as this “relational turn” appears to be, there are important theoretical, epistemological, and axiological challenges that remain and need to be addressed. This chapter takes up and investigates a number of these open questions regarding third wave HCI. It begins by briefly reconsidering the three waves or paradigms of HCI research and demonstrating how what appears last in the numbered sequence, the third wave, is actually older and “more original” than it initially appears to be. It then examines the opportunities and challenges of the phenomenological commitment that is operationalized in third wave HCI. And it concludes by identifying and outlining the consequences of this innovation for current and future research efforts.

References

  1. Boden M, Bryson J, Caldwell D, Dautenhahn K et al (2017) Principles of robotics: regulating robots in the real world. Connect Sci 29(2):124–129.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2016.1271400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Callicott, JB (1989) In defense of the land ethic: essays in environmental philosophy. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  3. Churchland PM (1999) Matter and consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Coeckelbergh M (2012) Growing moral relations: critique of moral status ascription. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darling K (2012) Extending legal protection to social robots. IEEE Spectrum. http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artificial-intelligence/extending-legal-protection-to-social-robots. Accessed 8 Dec 2017
  6. Ess C (1996) The political computer: democracy, CMC, and Habermas. In: Ess C (ed) Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 196–230Google Scholar
  7. Ess C (2009) Digital media ethics. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Floridi L (2013) The ethics of information. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garreau J (2007) Bots on the ground: in the field of battle (or even above it), robots are a soldier’s best friend. Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/05/AR2007050501009.html. Accessed 8 Dec 2017
  10. Gunkel DJ (2010) The real problem: avatars, metaphysics and online social interaction. New Media Soc 12(1):127–141.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunkel DJ (2012) The machine question: critical perspectives on ai, robots and ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrison S, Sengers D, Tatar D (2007) The three paradigms of HCI. CHI 2007, 28 April–3 May, San Jose, CAGoogle Scholar
  13. Hegel GWF(1969) Science of logic (trans: Miller AV). Humanities Press International, Atlantic HighlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morrison JC (2006) Marshall McLuhan: no prophet without honor. AmeriQuests. http://ejournals.library.vanderbilt.edu/ojs/index.php/ameriquests/issue/view/4/showToc. Accessed 8 Dec 2017
  16. Prescott TJ (2017) Robots are not just tools. Connect Sci 29(2):142–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2017.1279125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Scott RL (1967) On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Cent States Speech J 18(1):9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10510976709362856MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Searle J (1984) Minds, brains and science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Searle J (1999) The Chinese room. In: Wilson R, Keil F (eds) The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 115–116Google Scholar
  21. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. Illinois Press, UrbanazbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Singer P (2009) Wired for war: the robotics revolution and conflict in the twenty-first century. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Turing A (1999) Computing machinery and intelligence. In: Meyer P (ed) Computer media and communication: a reader. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Turkle S (2011) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Verbeek P (2011) Moralizing technology: understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wiener N (1996) Cybernetics: or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  27. Winograd T (1990) Thinking machines: can there be? Are we? In: Partridge D, Wilks Y (eds) The foundations of artificial intelligence: a sourcebook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolf G (1996) Channeling Mcluhan. Wired 4(1). http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.01/channeling_pr.html. Accessed 8 Dec 2017
  29. Žižek S (2002) Revolution at the gates. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Žižek S (2006) The parallax view. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. Žižek S (2008a) For they know not what they do: enjoyment as a political factor. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Žižek S (2008b) In defense of lost causes. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations