Abstract

Over the past years, the transnational debate of climate change has shifted. While only two decades ago, the climate change was seen as a future risk of melting polar glacier caps, rising sea levels of oceans and the implications of CO2 emissions on the environment, and these processes of planetary destruction are today significant—climate change has become not only a reality but also a catastrophe which requires urgent policy approaches to minimize further implications on a global scale.

References

  1. Albert, M. (2016). A theory of world politics. In Cambridge studies in international relations (p. I). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (2008). The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berglez, P. (2008). What is global journalism? Journalism Studies, 9(6), 845–858.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700802337727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boykoff, M. T. (2007a). Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39(4), 470–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boykoff, M. T. (2007b). From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 477–489.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00270.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., & McComas, K. (2004). Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication and Society, 7(3), 359–377.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brueggemann, M., & Engesser S. (2017). Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes the media coverage of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 58–67.Google Scholar
  9. Castan Broto, V. (2017). Urban governance and the politics of climate change. World Development, 93, 1–15.Google Scholar
  10. Christoff, P., & Eckersley, R. (2013). Globalization and the environment. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. Cottle, S. (2006). Mediatized conflict: Developments in media and conflict studies. Maidenhead, Berkshire and New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Das, J. (2012). Environmental journalism in Bangladesh. Journalism Studies, 13(2), 226–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Froehlich, C., & Bettini, G. (2017). Where next? Climate change, migration, and the (bio)politics of adaptation. Global Policy, 8(1), 33–39. Google Scholar
  14. Gibson, T. A., Craig, R. T., & Alpert, J. M. (2016). Covering global warming in dubious times—Environmental reporters in the new media ecosystem. Journalism, 17(4), 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han, J., et al. (2017). Framing climate change: A content analysis of Chinese mainstream newspapers from 2005–2015. International Journal of Communication. July (online publication).Google Scholar
  16. Kwenda, J. C. (2013). Environmental NGO’s as news sources: A sociological approach to the study of environmental journalism in South Africa. Global Media Journal-African Edition, 7(1), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lidskog, R., Mol, A. P. J., & Oosterveer, P. (2015). Towards a global environmental sociology? Current Sociology, 63(3), 339–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mercado, M. T. (2012). Media representation of climate change in the Argentinian press. Journalism Studies, 13(2), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Midtun, A., Coulter, P., Gadzekpo, A., & Wang, J. (2015). Comparing media framing of climate change in developed, rapid growth and developing countries. Energy & Environment, 26(8), 1271–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olausson, U., & Berglez, P. (2014). Media and climate change: Four long-standing research challenges revisited. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 249–265.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.906483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rantanen, T. (2010). Methodological inter-nationalism in comparative media research: Flow studies in international communication. In A. Roosvall & I. Salovaara-Moring (Eds.), Communicating the nation: National topografies of global media landscapes (pp. 25–39). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Rantanen, T. (2013). A critique of the systems approaches in comparative media research: A Central and Eastern European perspective. Global Media and Communication, 9(3), 257–277.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766513504175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reese, S. (2001). Understanding the global journalist: A hierarchy-of-influences approach. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rhaman, M. (2016). Cops and climate: The practice of development journalism in Bangladesh. Journal of Development Communication, 27(1), 18–43.Google Scholar
  25. Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Robertson, R., & Inglis, D. (2004). The global animus: In the tracks of world consciousness. Globalizations, 1(1), 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Semujju, R. B. (2013). Climate change in Ugandan media: A ‘global warming’ of journalism ethics. Journal of African Media Studies, 5(3), 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Volkmer, I. (2014). The global public sphere: Public communication in the age of reflective interdependence. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations