Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009903206236.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher–tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.
Chevallard, Y. (1988, August). On didactic transposition theory: Some introductory notes. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Research and development in Mathematics, Bratislava, Czechoslavakia.
Choppin, J. (2011). Learned adaptations: Teachers’ understanding and use of curriculum resources. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(5), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9170-3.
Cobb, P., Zhao, Q., & Dean, C. (2009). Conducting design experiments to support teachers’ learning: A reflection from the field. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 165–199.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Education Research, 2(53), 159–199.
Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633–646.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218.
Kheong, F. H., Sharpe, P., Soon, G. K., Ramakrishnan, C., Wah, B. L. P., & Choo, M. (2009). Math in focus: The Singapore approach by Marshall Cavendish. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Kheong, F. H., Sharpe, P., Soon, G. K., Ramakrishnan, C., Wah, B. L. P., & Choo, M. (2010). Math in focus: The Singapore approach by Marshall Cavendish. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Ongstad, S. (2006). Mathematics and mathematics education as triadic communication? A semiotic framework exemplified. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 247–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-8302-7.
Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Investigating textbooks as crucial interfaces between culture, policy and teacher curricular practice: Two contrasted case studies in France and Norway. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0526-2.
Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French, and German classrooms: A way to understand teaching and learning cultures. ZDM Mathematics Education, 33(5), 158–175.
Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies, approche cognitive des instruments contemporains, Armand Colin, Paris (English version at http://ergoserv.psy.univ-paris8.fr/Site/default.asp?Act_group=1).
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts of research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Remillard, J. T. (2013, May). Beyond the script: Educative features of five mathematics curricula and how teachers use them. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Remillard, J. T. (2016). Keeping an eye on the teacher in the digital curriculum race. In M. Bates & Z. Usiskin (Eds.), Digital curricula in school mathematics (pp. 195–204). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(5), 705–718.
Remillard, J. T., & Kim, O.-K. (2017). Knowledge of curriculum embedded mathematics: Exploring a critical domain of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9757-4.
Remillard, J. T., & Taton, J. (2015). Rewriting myths about curriculum materials and teaching to new standards. In J. A. Supovitz & J. Spillane (Eds.), Challenging standards: Navigating conflict and building capacity in the era of the common core (pp. 49–58). Lahnam, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
Remillard, J. T., Van Steenbrugge, H., & Bergqvist, T. (2016, April). A cross-cultural analysis of the voice of six teacher’s guides from three cultural contexts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.
Simon, M., & Tzur, R. (1999). Explicating the teachers’ perspective from the researcher’ perspectives: Generating accounts of mathematics teachers’ practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 252–264.
Sleep, L. (2009). Teaching to the mathematical point: Knowing and using mathematics in teaching (Unpublished dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.
Stein, M. K., & Kim, G. (2009). The role of mathematics curriculum materials in large-scale urban reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 37–55). New York: Routledge.
Ulrich, C. (2015). Stages in constructing and coordinating units additively and multiplicatively (part 1). For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(3), 2–7.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.