Instructional Activity and Student Interaction with Digital Resources

  • Kenneth RuthvenEmail author
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)


This chapter examines selected recent studies of the design and use of digital curriculum programmes and dynamic mathematical tools in school mathematics. The examples chosen bring out diversity both in the types of digital resources which are being adopted for teaching school mathematics and in the ways in which these are being taken up in instructional activity. These examples also show how any particular resource can be used in very different ways, and in ways quite different from those espoused by its advocates or intended by the designer. Digitised versions of traditional textbooks are cautiously innovative while individualised learning designs promote more ‘personalised’ instruction. Use of dynamic digital mathematical tools can support exploratory patterns of mathematical activity, underpinned by feedback from students’ interaction with these tools.


Mathematics teachers’ resources Curriculum programmes Digital resources Dynamic tools Instructional activity Interaction patterns School mathematics Task environments 


  1. Becker, H. J. (1992). Computer-based integrated learning systems in the elementary and middle grades: A critical review and synthesis of evaluation reports. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choppin, J., Carson, C., Borys, Z., Cerosaletti, C., & Gillis, R. (2014). A typology for analyzing digital curricula in mathematics education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark-Wilson, A. (2010). Emergent pedagogies and the changing role of the teacher in the TI-Nspire Navigator-networked mathematics classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42(7), 747–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Drijvers, P. (2011). From ‘Work-and-walk-by’ to ‘Sherpa-at-work’. Mathematics Teaching, 222, 22–26.Google Scholar
  5. Erlwanger, S. H. (1975). Case studies of children’s conceptions of mathematics: Part I. Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behavior, 1(3), 157–283.Google Scholar
  6. Gagné, R. M., & Paradise, N. E. (1961). Abilities and learning sets in knowledge acquisition. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 75(14), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hativa, N. (1988). Sigal’s ineffective computer-based practice of arithmetic: A case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirsch, C. R. (1976). A review of research on individualized instruction in secondary mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 76(6), 499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Murphy, R., Gallagher, L., Krumm, A., Mislevy, J., & Hafter, A. (2014). Research on the use of Khan Academy in schools: Implementation report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI Education. Accessed October 1, 2017.
  10. Ruthven, K. (2016). The re-sourcing movement in mathematics teaching: Some European initiatives. In M. Bates & Z. Usiskin (Eds.), Digital curricula in school mathematics (pp. 75–86). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Ruthven, K., Deaney, R., & Hennessy, S. (2009). Using graphing software to teach about algebraic forms: A study of technology-supported practice in secondary-school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2008). Constructions of dynamic geometry: A study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Computers and Education, 51(1), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: Computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations