Advertisement

Open Educational Resources: A Chance for Opening Mathematics Teachers’ Resource Systems?

  • Luc TroucheEmail author
  • Ghislaine Gueudet
  • Birgit Pepin
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

This chapter proposes a theoretical frame, the documentational approach to didactics (DAD), as a tool for analyzing the changes brought about by digitalization in the design and uses of mathematics teaching resources. One of the major changes appears to be initiated by the profusion of Open Educational Resources (OER), which provide new opportunities for the design and use of teaching resources. In order to analyze the effects of such opportunities, we focus on two cases: the French Sésamath association, providing OERs at a large scale; and a French mathematics teacher using OERs as a means for accomplishing her teaching. Through the lens of DAD, we investigate the implication of this provision of ‘resources-on-offer’ for teachers’ practices.

Keywords

Mathematics teachers’ resources Open Educational Resources Documentational approach to didactics Resource system Teachers’ design work Teachers’ collective work 

References

  1. Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualizing resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224.Google Scholar
  2. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1978). Federal program supporting educational change. In Implementing and sustaining innovations (Vol. VIII). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Choppin, J., Carson, C., Borys, Z., Cerosaletti, C., & Gillis, R. (2014). A typology for analyzing digital curricula in mathematics education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(1), 11–25.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. (2013). Opening up education: Innovative teaching and learning for all through new technologies and open educational resources. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM/2013/0654 final. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52013DC0654. Accessed July 15, 2017.
  6. Gringoz, H. (2015). Sésamath development seen by the president of this association. Contribution to the ReVEA seminar on teachers’ collective documentation work. Available at http://ife.ens-lyon.fr/ife/recherche/groupes-de-travail/revea-collectif. Accessed July 15, 2017.
  7. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2012a). From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Gueudet, G., Sacristan, A. I., Soury-Lavergne, S., & Trouche, L. (2012b). Online paths in mathematics teacher training: New resources and new skills for teacher educators. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44(6), 717–731.Google Scholar
  9. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., Sabra, H., & Trouche, L. (2016). Collective design of an e-textbook: Teachers’ collective documentation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2/3), 187–203.Google Scholar
  10. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2013). Textbooks’ design and digital resources. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education (pp. 327–337). ICMI Study 22, Oxford. Available at https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/837488/filename/ICMI_STudy_22_proceedings_2013-FINAL_V2.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2017.
  11. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218.Google Scholar
  12. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2012a). Teachers’ work with resources: Documentation geneses and professional geneses. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 23–41). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2012b). Communities, documents and professional geneses: Interrelated stories. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 305–322). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Johnstone, S. M. (2005). Open educational resources serve the world. Educause Review. http://er.educause.edu/articles/2005/1/open-educational-resources-serve-the-world. Accessed July 15, 2017.
  15. Larsen, K., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2005). The impact of ICT on tertiary education: Advances and promises. Washington: OECD/NSF/U.Google Scholar
  16. McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ad53/b9655587771edcf4ae028d4490a218d87ff2.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2017.
  17. OECD. (2007). Giving knowledge for free. The emergence of open educational resources. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  18. Pédauque, R. T. (Coll.). (2003). Document, forme, signe et medium, les reformulations du numérique. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/sic_00000511/document. Accessed July 15, 2017.
  19. Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Re-sourcing teacher work and interaction: A collective perspective on resource, their use and transformation. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(7), 929–943.Google Scholar
  20. Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., Yerushalmy, M., Trouche, L., & Chazan, D. (2016a). E-textbooks in/for teaching and learning mathematics: A disruptive and potentially transformative educational technology. In L. English & D Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 636–661). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  21. Pepin, B., Xu, B., Trouche, L., & Wang, C. (2016b). Developing a deeper understanding of mathematics teaching expertise: Chinese mathematics teachers’ resource systems as windows into their work and expertise. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(3), 257–274. http://rdcu.be/koXk. Accessed July 15, 2017.
  22. Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K., & Sinclair, N. (2017a). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: Foundations for change. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(5), 645–661.Google Scholar
  23. Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2017b). Refining teacher design capacity: Mathematics teachers’ interactions with digital curriculum resources. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(5), 799–812, http://rdcu.be/tmXb.
  24. Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(2), 165–178.Google Scholar
  25. Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  26. Sabra, H. (2016). L’étude des rapports entre documentations individuelle et collective: Incidents, connaissances et ressources mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 36(1), 49–95.Google Scholar
  27. Sabra, H., & Trouche, L. (2011). Collective design of an online math textbook: When individual and collective documentation works meet. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Research on Mathematics Education CERME 7 (pp. 2356–2366). Rzeszow, Poland: University of Rzeszow and ERME. Available from http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~erme/doc/cerme7/CERME7.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2017.
  28. Trgalová, J., & Jahn, A. P. (2013). Quality issue in the design and use of resources by mathematics teachers. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(7), 973–986.Google Scholar
  29. Trgalová, J., Jahn, A.P., & Soury-Lavergne, S. (2009). Quality process for dynamic geometry resources: The intergeo project. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME 6 (pp. 1161–1170). Lyon: INRP and ERME. Available from www.inrp.fr/editions/cerme6. Accessed July 15, 2017.
  30. Vergnaud, G. (1998). Toward a cognitive theory of practice. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 227–241). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  31. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Williamson, B. (2013). The future of the curriculum: School knowledge in the digital age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ENS de LyonLyonFrance
  2. 2.UBOBrestFrance
  3. 3.TU/eEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations