Advertisement

Research Oriented Learning in a Research Association – Evaluated in a Maturity Model

  • Kerstin Haas
  • Jürgen Mottok
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 715)

Abstract

Research-oriented learning provides students the opportunity to develop their research competences by experiencing research practice, this often happens in the surrounding of research associations with different universities and companies. This paper introduces a two-step approach to evaluate the research-oriented learning within a research association. First we conduct the evaluation of the research environment with the instrument of the adapted Collaboration Maturity Model (Col-MM) to see whether the collaboration network and the management is able to support the students in their learning process. Additionally, we take into account the evaluation of the students’ research competence. This approach targets the assessment of the starting conditions of the students and to compare their performance level until the end of the research association project phase. These two evaluation phases provide the potential to create an ideal research environment and consequently enable the students to develop and improve their research competence.

Keywords

Research-oriented learning Research competence Research association 

References

  1. 1.
    Böttcher, F., Thiel, F.: Evaluating research-oriented teaching: a new instrument to assess university students’ research competences. High. Educ. 1–20, (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0128-y
  2. 2.
    Aholaakko, T., Komulainen, K., Majakulma, A., Niinistö-Sivuranta, S.: Crossing Borders and Creating Future Competences. Laurea Publications, Helsinki (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt: What is research-oriented learning. https://www.europa-uni.de/en/struktur/zsfl/Hintergrundinformation/Forschendes-Lernen/index.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2017
  4. 4.
    Defila, R., Di Giulio, A., Scheuermann, M.: Forschungsverbundmanagement. Handbuch für die Gestaltung inter- und transdisziplinärer Projekte. Vdf Hochschulverlag (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boughzala, I., de Vreede, G.: Evaluating team collaboration quality: the development and field application of a collaboration maturity model. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 32, 129–157 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Magdaleno, A.M., Araujo, R., Werner, C.M.L.: A roadmap to the collaboration maturity model (CollabMM) evolution (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Bruin, T., Rosemann, M., Freeze, R., Kulkarni, U.: Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. Paper in 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Defila, R., Di Giulio, A.: Panorama Sondernummer 99: transdisziplinarität evaluieren – aber wie? In: International Transdisciplinarity Conference (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OTH RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations