Assessing the Learning Process Playing with Kahoot – A Study with Upper Secondary School Pupils Learning Electrical Circuits

  • Charilaos Tsihouridis
  • Dennis Vavougios
  • George S. Ioannidis
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 715)


The present study investigates the extent to which the popular game-based online platform of Kahoot can be used as a creative and effective tool in the teaching practice and specifically in the teaching of basic concepts of electric circuits. A comparative study was conducted for this reason with two groups of 67 learners in total, where the experimental group participated in the design of their own questions within the framework of formative assessment with the use of Kahoot, whereas the second group followed a traditional way for their assessment. According to the results, the integration of Kahoot in the teaching process improved learners’ understanding of certain concepts on electric circuits, enhanced their active participation in the lesson, motivated them towards learning and constituted a creative and fun-tool to use for teaching purposes.


ICT Kahoot Classroom Response Systems Teaching electric circuits 


  1. 1.
    Sharma, A., Gandhar, K., Sharma, S., Seema, S.: Role of ICT in the process of teaching and learning. J. Educ. Pract. 2(5), 1–5 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wendy, M.: Not just tools: the role of E-technologies in culture of learning. Educ. Commun. Inf. 1(2), 229–235 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lucke, Τ., Keyssner, U., Dunn, P.: The use of a classroom response system to more effectively flip the classroom. In: IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2013, pp. 491–495 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duncan, D.: Clickers in the Classroom. Pearson, San Francisco (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Owusu, A., Weatherby, N., Otto, S., Kang, M.: Validation of a classroom response system for use with a health risk assessment survey. Poster session at the 2007 AAHPERD National Convention and Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abramson, D., Pietroszek, K., Chinaei, L., Lank, E., Terry, M.: Classroom response systems in higher education: meeting user needs with NetClick. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), March 2013, pp. 840–846 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Collins, K.: Kahoot! is gamifying the classroom (2015).
  8. 8.
    Diaz, C., Trejo, C.: Kahoot: The Student-Teacher Interactive Classroom Tool (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meijen, C.: Kahoot: using a game based classroom response system in teaching. School of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Kent (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sunde, M.T., Underdal, A.G.: Investigating QoE in a cloud-based classroom response system, a real-life longitudinal and cross-sectional study of Kahoot. Master of Science in Communication Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fotaris, P., Mastoras, T., Leinfellner, R., Rosunally, Y.: Climbing up the leaderboard: an empirical study of applying gamification techniques to a computer programming class. Electron. J. e-Learn. 14(2), 94–110 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, A.I.: The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Comput. Educ. 82(C), 1–24 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Driver, R.: Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 11(5), 481–490 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shipstone, D.M.: A study of children’s understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits. Eur. J. Sci. Educ. 6(2), 185–198 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Psillos, D., Koumaras, P., Valassiades, O.: Pupils’ representations of electric current before, during, and after instruction on DC circuits. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 5(2), 185–199 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Engelhardt, P.V., Beichner, R.J.: Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. Am. J. Phys. 72(1), 98–115 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baser, M.: Effects on conceptual change and traditional confirmatory simulations on pre-service teachers’ understanding of direct current circuits. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 15(5), 367–381 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moore, C.J., Rubbo, L.J.: Scientific reasoning abilities of non-science majors in physics-based courses. Phys. Rev. STPER, 8(1), 1–18 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charilaos Tsihouridis
    • 1
  • Dennis Vavougios
    • 1
  • George S. Ioannidis
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ThessalyVolosGreece
  2. 2.University of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations