Flipped Classroom Method Combined with Project Based Group Work

  • Ilona Béres
  • Márta Kis
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 715)


The purpose of this paper is to present in practice how the flipped learning approach works in the instruction of high number of higher education students. This article presents the developed flipped classroom method combined with project based group work in seminars. The participants were students majoring in field of Communication, Business and Tourism. In order to examine the efficiency of the implemented method and to confirm the positive or negative learning experiences, students were asked to complete a feedback questionnaire. In this paper we present the analysis of the opinions of 544 higher education students.


Active learning Project work Flipped classroom 


  1. 1.
    Barkely, E.: Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. Josses-Bass, Hoboken (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boud, D., Cohen, R., Sampson, J.: Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Rutledge (2014).
  3. 3.
    Béres, I., Kis, M., Licskó, L., Magyar, T.: Technological support of web based project work in higher education. In: 2011 14th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 209–213. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bishop, J.L., Verleger, M.A.: The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. In: ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, vol. 30, no. 9 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davies, R.S., Dean, D.L., Ball, N.: Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 61(4), 563–580 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., Wenderoth, M.P.: Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111(23), 8410–8415 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., Arfstrom, K.M.: A review of flipped learning (2013). Accessed 15 Jan 2017
  8. 8.
    Jensen, J.L., Kummer, T.A., Godoy, P.D.D.M.: Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE—Life Sci. 14, 1–12 (2015). Accessed 15 Jan 2017. Spring
  9. 9.
    Mason, G.S., Shuman, T.R., Cook, K.E.: Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Trans. Educ. 56(4), 430–435 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Michael, J.: Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Adv. Physiol. Educ. 30(4), 159–167 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mok, H.N.: Teaching tip: the flipped classroom. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 25(1), 7–11 (2014). Accessed 29 Sept 2016
  12. 12.
    O’Flaherty, J., Phillips, C.: The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. Internet Higher Educ. 25, 85–95 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prince, M.: Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93(3), 223–231 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strayer, J.F.: How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learn. Environ. Res. 15(2), 171–193 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Methodological DepartmentBudapest Metropolitan UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations