Evaluation of Early Introduction to Concurrent Computing Concepts in Primary School

  • Eleni Fatourou
  • Nikolaos C. Zygouris
  • Thanasis Loukopoulos
  • Georgios I. Stamoulis
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 715)


Learning computer programming is a basic literacy in the digital age, which helps children develop creative problem solving, logical thinking and mental flexibility. Many countries have introduced computer science in their curriculum. For example, in the educational system of United Kingdom, pupils are introduced to computer science topics from the age of six, while in Greece the teaching of computer programming commences at the age of eleven. Given differences in culture, available infrastructures, as well as the age pupils are introduced to computer science, the challenge of forming a computer science curriculum that not only offers basic background but expands the cognitive horizon and cultivates the imagination of students, still remains a challenge. Towards this end, this study focuses on exploring the potential merits of introducing concurrent programming concepts early in the learning process. Results indicate that uninitiated to programming pupils at the age of eleven were able to comprehend basic concurrency topics, while pupils at the age of twelve with some programming familiarity were able to understand more advanced concepts and use them successfully for problem solving.


Concurrent programming Constructivism Scratch 


  1. 1.
    Ackermann, E.: Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: what’s the difference. Future Learn. Group Publ. 5(3), 438 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, J.P., Pianta, R.C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A.Y., Lun, J.: An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science 333(6045), 1034–1037 (2011). AAASCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brennan, K., Resnick, M.: New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 1–25 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clements, D.H., Sarama, J.: Research on logo: a decade of progress. Comput. Sch. 14(1–2), 9–46 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Schoolnet: Computing our future computer programming and coding - priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. Accessed 10 May 2017
  6. 6.
    Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., Mavroudi, E.: Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: a case study. Comput. Educ. 63, 87–97 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Franklin, D., Hill, C., Dwyer, H.A., Hansen, A.K., Iveland, A., Harlow, D.B.: Initialization in scratch: seeking knowledge transfer. In: SIGCSE 2016, pp. 217–222. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lewis, C.M.: Is pair programming more effective than other forms of collaboration for young students? Comput. Sci. Educ. 21(2), 105–134 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mayer, R.E.: Teaching and Learning Computer Programming: Multiple Research Perspectives. Routledge, Abingdon (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., Ben-Ari, M.: Learning computer science concepts with scratch. Comput. Sci. Educ. 23(3), 239–264 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, 2nd edn. Basic Books, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sáez-López, J.-M., Román-González, M., Vázquez-Cano, E.: Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: a two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Comput. Educ. 97, 129–141 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsihouridis, C., Vavougios, D., Ioannidis, G.: The effect of switching the order of experimental teaching in the study of simple gravity pendulum-a study with junior high-school learners. In: International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, pp. 501–514. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilson, A., Moffatt, D.C.: Evaluating scratch to introduce younger schoolchildren to programming. In: 22nd Annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, pp. 64–74 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zygouris, N.C., Vlachos, F., Dadaliaris, A.N., Oikonomou, P., Stamoulis, G.I., Vavougios, D., et al.: The implementation of a web application for screening children with dyslexia. In: International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, pp. 415–423. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleni Fatourou
    • 1
  • Nikolaos C. Zygouris
    • 1
  • Thanasis Loukopoulos
    • 2
  • Georgios I. Stamoulis
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of ThessalyLamiaGreece
  2. 2.Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics DepartmentUniversity of ThessalyLamiaGreece
  3. 3.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations