The Perception of the One-Semester International Academic Mobility Programme by Students of Computer Science

  • Marek Milosz
  • Elzbieta Milosz
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 715)


Increase in student mobility is one of the objectives of the European Union (EU) and many other countries of the world. This mobility is meant to increase the ability and flexibility to acquire knowledge and skills by students, get them used to the freedom of movement of people and services, and educate them in the area of international and multicultural cooperation. The EU, through a number of programmes (especially those grouped in Erasmus+), supports such mobility organisationally and financially. The article presents the results of research among students of Computer Science (CS), aimed at detecting their perception of the opportunity to participate in a one-semester international academic mobility, i.e. to study abroad for one semester. The survey covered almost all undergraduate CS students of the Lublin University of Technology at their fifth semester, when they take decisions to apply to go abroad for one semester. We analysed their overall assessment of this type of travel, the level of the perceived usefulness of the experience, the concerns and risks associated with it and the students’ interest. Some elements of the research were differentiated for Polish and foreign students. The results of the tests are not conclusive, because despite the generally positive perception of the programme, a relatively small percentage of students declare their willingness to take part in it.


International student mobility Perception of usefulness Risks and concerns 


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    González, C.R., Mesanza, R.B., Mariel, P.: The determinants of international student mobility flows: an empirical study on the Erasmus programme. High. Educ. 62(4), 413–430 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beine, M., Noël, R., Ragot, L.: Determinants of the international mobility of students. Econ. Educ. Rev. 41, 40–54 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petersdotter, L., Niehoff, E., Freund, P.: International experience makes a difference: effects of studying abroad on students’ self-efficacy. Personal. Individ. Differ. 107, 174–178 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haussen, T., Uebelmesser, S.: Student and Graduate migration and its effect on the financing of higher education. Educ. Econ. 24(6), 573–591 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Mol, C.: Do employers value international study and internships? A comparative analysis of 31 countries. Geoforum 78, 52–60 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koziel, G., Milosz, M.: IT studies and IT industry – a case study. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN 2014), pp. 5796–5802. IATED, Barcelona (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crescenzi, R., Gagliardi, L., Orru’, E.: Learning mobility grants and skill (mis)matching in the labour market: the case of the ‘Master and Back’ programme. Reg. Sci. 95(4), 693 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aresi, G., Moore, S., Marta, E.: Italian credit mobility students significantly increase their alcohol intake, risky drinking and related consequences during the study abroad experience. Alcohol Alcohol. 51(6), 723–726 (2016). OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryla, P.: The impact of international student mobility on subsequent employment and professional career: a large-scale survey among Polish former Erasmus students. In: Procedia – social and behavioral sciences. International Educational Technology Conference, IETC 2014, vol. 176, Chicago, IL, USA, 3–5 September 2014, pp. 633-641 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milosz, M., Milosz, E., Grzegórski, S.: Tempus programme and its influence on development of EU Universities. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, (ICERI 2016), pp. 8615–8623. IATED (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The Report on the Activities of the Office of International Exchange for the Academic Year 2014/15, p. 5 (2016). (in Polish)
  13. 13.
    Lukasik, E., Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., Milosz, M.: Meeting the ICT industry needs by universities. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED 2015), pp. 3135–3140. IATED (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Milosz, M.: Social competencies of graduates in Computer Science from the employer perspective – study results. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2014), pp. 1666–1672. IATED (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borys, M., Milosz, M., Plechawska-Wójcik, M.: Using Deming cycle for strengthening cooperation between industry and university in IT engineering education programme. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milosz, M., Plechawska-Wójcik, M., Borys, M., Luján-Mora S.: International seminars as a part of modern master Computer Science education. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Technology, Education and Development (INTED 2012), pp. 1494–1500. IATED (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plechawska-Wójcik, M., Milosz, M., Borys, M.: Contribution of international seminars on Computer Science to education adjustment on the European IT industry market. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Milosz, M., Lukasik, E.: Additional trainings of students as a way to closing the competency gap. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED 2016), pp. 8590–8596. IATED (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Milosz, M., Milosz, E.: Computer Science studies in English from the perspective of students and business. In: Wrycza, S. (ed.) Information Systems: Development, Research, Applications, Education. SIGSAND/PLAIS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 264, pp. 167–178. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceLublin University of TechnologyLublinPoland

Personalised recommendations