Plagiarism Deterring by Using a Sociocybernetic System

  • Dorin Isoc
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 715)


After more than four years of research and assessment of a sociocybernetic system, the present paper makes the first coherent and concrete reporting. The purpose of the sociocybernetic system is to deter plagiarism in a society clogged with this scourge. The technical features of identification of the act are given, and further the sociocybernetic tool functions included in the sociocybernetic system are specified in the form of the Plagiarized Works Index. The functionality of the Index is placed on the detailed structure, organized on the presentation of records and databases. From the operation of the Index, information is collected so that one builds up statistics that are detailed interpreted. In conclusion, the way of action on historical plagiarisms is made so that they represent an exemplification in the training of the young students, but also a way in which the authors of the published plagiarized works are subject to public rebellion.


Plagiarism Civil society Intellectual pollution Sociocybernetic system Academic integrity Plagiarism deterrence 


  1. 1.
    Berlinck, R.: The academic plagiarism and its punishments - a review. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 21(3), 365–372 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Born, A.: How to reduce plagiarism. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 14(3), 223 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burke, M.: Deterring plagiarism: a new role for librarians. Libr. Philos. Pract. 6(2), 10 (2017). (e-journal)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glendinning, I.: Responses to student plagiarism in higher education across Europe. Int. J. Educ. Integrity 10(1) (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hornung, B.: Principles of sociocybernetics. In: Symposium on Sociocybernetics, Social Complexities from the Individual to Cyberspace, ISA–RC51, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Isoc, D.: User Action Guide Against Plagiarism: Good Conduct, Preventing, Combating (in Romanian). Ecou Transilvan, Cluj-Napoca (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isoc, D.: Notes on the design of socio-cybernetic systems (2017, to be published)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keuskamp, D., Sliuzas, R.: Plagiarism prevention or detection? The contribution of text-matching software to education about academic integrity. J. Acad. Lang. Learn. 1(1), A91–A99 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krippendorff, K.: The cybernetics of design and the design of cybernetics. Kybernetes 36(9/10), 1381–1392 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin, D.: Plagiarism and technology: a tool for coping with plagiarism. J. Educ. Bus. 80(3), 149–152 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Osipian, A.: Corruption in higher education: does it differ across the nations and why? Res. Comp. Int. Educ. 3(4), 345–365 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., Petrovecki, M.: On academic plagiarism in Europe. An analytical approach based on four studies. Digithum 10, 13–19 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stabingis, L., Šarlauskienė, L., Čepaitienė, N.N.: Measures for plagiarism prevention in students’ written works: case study of ASU experience. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 110, 689–699 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sutherland-Smith, W., Carr, R.: Turnitin. com: teachers’ perspectives of anti-plagiarism software in raising issues of educational integrity. J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 2(3), 94–101 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    UDC: Universal decimal classification (2017).

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations