Abstract
This article proposes an innovative theoretical framework for applying the Living Lab approach, traditionally adopted in entrepreneurial contexts, to the context of alternating training (AT) at school in co-designing, implementing and evaluating AT scenarios, with the final aim of fostering the role of the school as a social hub connecting several societal actors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein
References
Bergvall-Kåreborn B et al (2009) A milieu for innovation: defining living labs. In: ISPIM innovation symposium
Brown J (2002) The World Cafe: a resource guide for hosting conversations that matter. In: Whole systems associates
Bruns A (2008) Blogs, wikipedia, second life and beyond: from production to produsage. Peter Lang, Pieterlen, Switzerland
Corley KG (2015) A commentary on “what grounded theory is…”: engaging a phenomenon from the perspective of those living it. Organ Res Methods 18(4):600–605
Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31:1257–1274
Hasselkuss M, Naedeker C, Liedtke C (2017) Social practices as a main focus in living lab research. Springer International Publishing Switzerland
Jasanoff S (2011) The politics of public reason. In: The politics of knowledge, Baert et Robio Eds. Routledge, Abingdon
Levén P, Jonny Holmström J (2008) Consumer co-creation and the ecology of innovation: a living lab approach. In; IRIS 31, The 31st information systems research seminar in Scandinavia
Steiner F, Brown J, da Silva FM (2015) The world café in action research settings. In: Bradbury H (ed) The Sage handbook of action research. Sage
Valente A (2015) Science education. What science to study and why. In: The contribution of the European Commission to responsible research and innovation. A review of the science and society (FP6) and science in society (FP7) programmes, prepared by the Local Scientific Committee, CNR Edizioni, pp 65–67
Van der Walt JS et al (2009) Community living lab as a collaborative innovation environment. Issues Informing Sci Inf Technol 6:421–436
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Valente, A. et al. (2018). Actors and Practices in Living Lab for Alternating Training. In: Responsible Research and Innovation Actions in Science Education, Gender and Ethics. SpringerBriefs in Research and Innovation Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73207-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73207-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73206-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73207-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)