Abstract
This study aims at providing new perspectives to the growing need of understanding the impact of some basic RRI principles to the quality of life of people, in their double role of workers in and citizens of a territory. It is still unclear, indeed, the complete mechanism that rules the improvement of innovation capabilities and behaviour when the principles of gender equality, privacy and engagement are applied to smart factories’ ecosystems. We propose a model based on the “ecology of innovation”, enabling the possibility to analyse the whole phenomena and dynamics through a homogenous and coherent vision of the whole applied-to-territory-innovation “system” and evaluate hidden dynamics that rule or support the scientific-technological-economic-policy innovation processes. The model is constituted by 4 domains (the smart factory; the stakeholders; the environment; the social sphere) and 45 nodes. The model could adapt different bibliographic sources into a unique patch defining the correlation among nodes and increase the possibilities to benchmark with real cases of application of RRI and CSR policies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carayannis EG (2009) Firm evolution dynamics: towards sustainable entrepreneurship and robust competitiveness in the knowledge economy and society. Int J Innov Reg Dev 1(3):235–254
Du Preez ND, Louw L, Essmann H (2006) An Innovation process model for improving innovation capability. J high technol manage res, 1-24.
Dvir, R., & Pasher, E. (2004). Innovation engines for knowledge cities: an innovation ecology perspective. J knowl manage, 8(5):16-27.
European Commission (2015) Expert group on policy indicators for responsible innovation. Indicators for promoting and monitoring responsible research and innovation
Metcalfe S, De Liso N, Gagliardi D, Ramlogan R (2013) University of Manchester—MIoIR
Niglia F, Gagliardi D, Battistella C (2012) Exploring the impact of innovation policies in economic environments with self-regulating agents in multi-level complex systems. In: De Marco M, Te’eni D, Albano V, Za S (2012) Information systems: crossroads for organization, management, accounting and engineering. Springer
OECD (2011) Measuring well-being and progress. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/std/OECD-Better-Life-Initiative.pdf
Paredes-Frigolett H, Gomes L. F. A. M, & Pereira J (2015). Governance of Responsible Research and Innovation: An Agent-Based Model Approach. Procedia Comput Sci, 55:912–921.
Pilon AF (2017) A global voice for survival: an ecosystemic approach for the environment and the quality of life. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2935734 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2935734
Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2006) Strategy & Society The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Bus Rev, 84:78-85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niglia, F., Corallo, A. (2018). An Innovation Model for the Analysis of the Role of Gender Equality, Privacy and Engagement of in Smart Factories’ Ecosystem. In: Responsible Research and Innovation Actions in Science Education, Gender and Ethics. SpringerBriefs in Research and Innovation Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73207-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73207-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73206-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73207-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)