Skip to main content

Instances of Promoting Creativity with Procedural Tasks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematical Creativity and Mathematical Giftedness

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

Abstract

The learning of algebraic procedures in middle-school algebra is usually perceived as an algorithmic activity, achieved by performing sequences of short drill-and-practice tasks, which have little to do with conceptual learning or with creative mathematical thinking. The goal of this chapter is to explore possible ways by which all middle-grade students can be encouraged to apply higher-order thinking in the context of tasks that integrate procedural work, conceptual understanding and creative thinking. Each of the five instances presented in this chapter was intended to promote creative thinking in the context of procedural tasks. An a-priori task analysis and data collected in some of our previous studies indicate the presence of many learning competencies and high levels of mathematical creativity in the participating students’ work. Thus, we conclude that certain procedural tasks have a strong potential to promote higher-order, and creative thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arcavi, A. (2005). Developing and using symbol sense in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25, 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, A., & Arcavi, A. (2017). Tasks and competencies in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, A., & Arcavi, A. (2012). Practicing algebraic skills: A conceptual approach. Mathematics Teacher, 105(8), 608–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, A. & Stein, H. (2001). Students’ choice of tools in solving equations in a technological learning environment. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 441–448). Utrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspekian, M. (2005). An ‘‘instrumental approach’’ to study the integration of computer tool into mathematics teaching: The case of spreadsheets. International Journal of Computers for Mathematics Learning, 10, 109–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Integrated Mathematics, Grades 7–9. (2015). Rehovot, Israel: The Weizmann Institute of Science (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. (2004). The core of algebra: Reflections on its main activities. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The Future of Teaching and Learning of Algebra: 12th ICMI Study (pp. 21–34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2013). Creativity and mathematics education: The state of the art. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Sriraman, B. (Eds.). (2017). Creativity and giftedness. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., Graham, A., Pimm, D., & Gowar, N. (1985). Routes to/Roots of Algebra. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matz, M. (1982). Towards a process model for high-school algebra errors. In D. Sleeman & S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 25–50). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R. (2007). Foregrounding procedural knowledge. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 132–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2008). Understanding equivalence of algebraic expressions in a spreadsheet-based environment. International Journal of Computers in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2013). School mathematics and creativity at the elementary and middle grade level: How are they related? ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2017). Algebraic procedures and creative thinking. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(1), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). The torrance tests of creative thinking: Technical-norms manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., Ainley, J., & Bills, L. (2005). Naming a column on a spreadsheet: Is it more algebraic? In D. Hewitt & A. Noyes (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth British Congress of Mathematics Education (pp. 184–191). Warwick, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Tabach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tabach, M., Friedlander, A. (2018). Instances of Promoting Creativity with Procedural Tasks. In: Singer, F. (eds) Mathematical Creativity and Mathematical Giftedness. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73155-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73156-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics