Advertisement

What Can Be Done About Drugs? Public Policy Options

  • Marcelo Bergman
Chapter
  • 377 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter seeks to provide basic information before any policy option is defined. It analyzes the social costs of drugs, the economic costs of the criminal justice system in fighting drugs, the health consequences of different drugs, the “job opportunities” for youngsters recruited from poor neighborhoods, and the public anxiety of drug trafficking. It analyzes many of the physical and psychological effects for users, from minor discomforts to serious health problems, and in some isolated cases, they may even cause death.

References

  1. AIHW (2008) National drug strategy household survey: first results. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/10579 Google Scholar
  2. Caulkins J (2000) Measurement and analysis of drug problems and drug control efforts. Crim Justice 4:391–449Google Scholar
  3. Dommet E (2010) La neurobiología de las adicciones. In: Tokatlian J (comp) Drogas y Prohibición: Una vieja guerra, un nuevo debate. Libros del Zorzal, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  4. Gable RS (2004) Comparison of acute lethal toxicity of commonly abused psychoactive substances. Addiction 99:686–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gettman J (2007) Lost taxes and other costs of marijuana laws. Bulletin of Cannabis Reform. October, 2007. http://www.drugscience.org/bcr4/bcr4_index.html
  6. Greenfield TK, Rogers JD (1999) Who drinks most of the alcohol in the US? The policy implications. J Stud Alcohol 60(1):78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall WD, Pacula RL (2003) Cannabis use and dependence: public health and public policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hilts PH (1994) Is nicotine addictive? It depends on whose criteria you use: experts say the definition of addiction is evolving. New York Times, vol 2, August, p C3Google Scholar
  9. Iversen L (2007) The science of marijuana. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kopp P (2011) Are drugs good for France? Revue Economique, September. http://www.businessinsider.com/pierre-kopp-marijuana-2011-8
  11. RAND (2005) Assessing U.S. drug problems and policy: a synthesis of the evidence to date, Research brief. Drug Policy Research Center. RAND, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  12. Reuter P (2009) If marijuana is legal, will addiction rise? New York Times, 19.07.2009Google Scholar
  13. Room R, Fischer B, Hall W, Lenton S, Reuter P (2008) Cannabis policy: moving beyond stalemate. The global cannabis commission report. The Beckley Foundation. At http://www.beckleyfoundation.org/Cannabis-Commission-Report.pdf
  14. Room R, Fischer B, Hall W, Lenton S, Reuter P (2010) Cannabis policy: moving beyond the stalemate. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Roques B (chair) (1999) La Dangerosité de drogues: rapport au Secrétariat d’État à la Santé [The dangerousness of drugs: report to the state secretariat for health]. La Documentation française-Odile Jacob, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. SAMHSA (2006) Results from the 2005 national survey on drug use and health: detailed tables. Prevalence estimates, standard errors, P values, Section 1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration, Office of Applied Studies, Rockville. Available from: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov Google Scholar
  17. Strategy Unit (2005) Strategy unit drugs report, May 2003. Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit, London. At http://www.strategy.gov.uk/work_areas/drugs/index.asp. Full report at http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys
  18. WDR (2014) World drugs report. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, ViennaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcelo Bergman
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Latin American Studies on Insecurity & ViolenceNational University of Tres de FebreroBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations