Skip to main content

\(GL^+\) and \(GL^-\) Regressions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Econometrics for Financial Applications (ECONVN 2018)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 760))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2389 Accesses

Abstract

Regression analysis for which the dependent variable is binary has typically been modelled by the Logit and the Probit models. We propose two new regression models \(GL^+\) and \(GL^-\) regressions based on the function of [5, 6] and the function of [4] for binary dependent variables. These models allow for possible asymmetries in the underlying mechanisms governing the binary output variable and make allowance for the independent variables to determine its shape. Our simulation results of the univariate regression indicate that the expected average mean square error is smallest for the \(GL^+\) model than the Logit or the Probit models. On the other hand, the expected correlation between the outcome and the predicted probabilities is greatest for the \(GL^-\) model than the Logit and Probit models. Therefore, the \(GL^+\) having higher predictive power over the Logit and Probit, should be more useful to researchers, economists and scientists that rely on the Logit and Probit models for their work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For parsimony, the log-likelihood functions and marginal effects of the logit and probit models are not presented here. Interested readers can refer to [20], and [7] for better treatment on the likelihoods and the marginal effects of these benchmark models.

References

  1. Allison, P.D., Christakis, N.A.: Logit models for sets of ranked items. In: Sociological Methodology, pp. 199–228 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amemiya, T.: Qualitative response models: a survey. J. Econ. Lit. 19(4), 1483–1536 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andoh, C.: Garch family models under varying innovations (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andoh, C.: Stochastic variance models in discrete time with feed forward neural networks. Neural Comput. 21(7), 1990–2008 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Balakrishnan, N.: Handbook of the Logistic Distribution. Marcel Dekker, New York (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Balakrishnan, N., Leung, M.Y.: Order statistics from the type I generalized logistic distribution. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 17(1), 25–50 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dougherty, C.: Introduction to Econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Danıelsson, J.: Financial Risk Forecasting: The Theory and Practice of Forecasting Market Risk with Implementation in R and MATLAB. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Embrechts, P., McNeil, A., Straumann, D.: Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls. In: Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond, pp. 176–223 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, Y., Rasouli, S., Timmermans, H., Wang, Y.: Reasons for not buying a car: a probit-selection multinomial logit choice model. Procedia Environ. Sci. 22, 414–422 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Horioka, C.Y.: Tenure choice and housing demand in Japan. J. Urban Econ. 24(3), 289–309 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hosmer Jr., D.W., Lemeshow, S., Sturdivant, R.X.: Applied Logistic Regression, vol. 398. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Klugman, S.A., Panjer, H.H., Willmot, G.E.: Loss Models: From Data to Decisions, vol. 715. Wiley, New York (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lehmann, E.L., Casella, G.: Theory of Point Estimation. Springer, New York (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ou, S., Reynolds, A.J.: Early childhood intervention and educational attainment: age 22 findings from the Chicago longitudinal study. J. Educ. Stud. Placed Risk 11(2), 175–198 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pampel, F.C.: Logistic Regression: A Primer, vol. 132. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pardoe, I., Simonton, D.K.: Applying discrete choice models to predict academy award winners. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A (Stat. Soc.) 171(2), 375–394 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Pregibon, D.: Logistic regression diagnostics. Ann. Stat. 9(4), 705–724 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rabe, B., Taylor, M.: Residential mobility, quality of neighbourhood and life course events. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A (Stat. Soc.) 173(3), 531–555 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Stock, J.H., Watson, M.W.: Introduction to Econometrics. Addison-Wiley, Boston (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Swaminathan, H., Rogers, H.J.: Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. J. Educ. Meas. 27(4), 361–370 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van de Ven, W.P., Van Praag, B.M.: The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: a probit model with sample selection. J. Econom. 17(2), 229–252 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Westgaard, S., Van der Wijst, N.: Default probabilities in a corporate bank portfolio: a logistic model approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 135(2), 338–349 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zmijewski, M.E.: Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. J. Account. Res. 22, 59–82 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Andoh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Andoh, C., Mensah, L., Atsu, F. (2018). \(GL^+\) and \(GL^-\) Regressions. In: Anh, L., Dong, L., Kreinovich, V., Thach, N. (eds) Econometrics for Financial Applications. ECONVN 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 760. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73150-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73150-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73149-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73150-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics