When Neutrality Cannot Protect Against Belligerence: The Position of the Low Countries Seen from Beyond Flanders Fields

  • Felicity RashEmail author


This introductory chapter describes the neutralization of Belgium and Luxembourg prior to the First World War and the German occupation of those nations between 2nd and 4th August 1914. It discusses some British and American interpretations of the term “neutrality” within the context of Belgium’s position at the start of the war and concludes with an examination of the roles and attitudes adopted by British aid workers who travelled to Belgium during the first few weeks of the war.


  1. Amory, Dean (ed.) (2014), The Flemish. Belgium: Edgar Adriaens.Google Scholar
  2. Barrow, J.H. (ed.) (1832), Mirror of Parliament for the Second Session of the tenth Parliament of Great Britain and Ireland. London: William Clowes.Google Scholar
  3. Burgess, John William (1915), The European War of 1914: Its Causes, Purposes and Probable Results. Chicago: A.C. McClurg & Co.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, Christopher (2013), The Sleepwalkers. How Europe went to War in 1914. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Declercq, Christophe (2015), Belgian Refugees in Britain 1914–1919. A cross-cultural study of Belgian identity in exile. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
  6. Declercq, Christophe (2016), ‘Belgium and the Semantic Flux of Flemish, French and Flemings’. In: Julian Walker and Christophe Declercq (eds.) Languages and the First World War: Communicating in a Transnational War. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. German ultimatum to Belgium, The National Archives, FO 371/1914.Google Scholar
  8. Jorgensen, C. (1999), The Common Cause: The Life and Death of the Anglo-Swedish Alliance against France, 1805–1809. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University College London. Available online. [, accessed 12.02.2017].
  9. Kaiser, Wolfram and Johan W. Schot (2014), Writing Rules for Europe: Experts, Cartels, and International Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keefer, S. A. (2011), Great Britain and Naval Arms Control: International Law and Security 1898–1914. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, London: LSE. Available online [, accessed 12.02.2017].
  11. Macbean Knight, W. Stanley (1914), The History of the Great European War. Its Causes and Effects. Vol. I. London: Caxton Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Marks, Sally (2014), ‘Belgium. The victim’. In: Alan Sharp (ed.), 28. June. Sarajevo 1914–Versailles, The War and Peace that Made the Modern World. London: Haus Histories.Google Scholar
  13. Mitton, Geraldine Edith; T’Serclaes, (Elsie), Baroness; Chisholm, Mairi (1917) The cellar-house of Pervyse : a tale of uncommon things from the journals and letters of the Baroness T'Serclaes and Mairi Chisholm. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
  14. Murray Allison, J. (1918), Raemaekers’ Cartoon History of the War, Volume 1, compiled by J. Murray Allison. New York: The Century Co. Project Gutenberg ebook.Google Scholar
  15. Parrott, Edward (1917), The Children’s Story of the War. London, Edinburgh and New York: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
  16. Raitt, Suzanne (2000), May Sinclair: A Modern Victorian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sanger, C.P. and H.T.J Norton (1915), England’s Guarantee to Belgium and Luxemburg, with the Full Text of the Treaties. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  18. Sinclair, May (1915), A Journal of Impressions in Belgium. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Sobich, Frank Oliver and Sebastian Bischoff (2015), Feinde werden. Zur nationalen Konstruktion existentieller Gegnerschaft: Drei Fallstudien. Berlin: Metropol.Google Scholar
  20. Souttar, Henry Sessions (1915), A Surgeon in Belgium. Project Gutenberg ebook.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations