The Value of ‘Measuring’ RRI Performance in Industry

Part of the SpringerBriefs in Research and Innovation Governance book series (BRIEFSREINGO)


Within the EU funded project ‘PRISMA’ (Piloting Responsible research and innovation in Industry: a roadmap for tranSforMAtive technologies, 2016-2019) we aim to (Cooper and Kleinschmidt 1995) help industries implement Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) strategies in their innovation processes, as part of their CSR policy, and (2) to provide evidence on how an RRI approach and explicit attention for the gender dimension can improve the innovation process and its outcomes. As part of our approach, we developed a method to intuitively score performance on certain RRI dimensions. The scoring method builds upon an earlier innovation quality monitoring tool, called the ‘success factor based live innovation project scoring and evaluation’ tool, and expands this tool with specific RRI elements. In this paper, we elaborate on the development of this scoring tool, and its potential value as a strategy to implement RRI in industrial innovation practice.


  1. Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ (1995) Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. J Prod Innov Manag 12:374–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. European Commission (2015) Indicators for promoting and monitoring responsible research and innovation. DG Res Innov ISBN 978-92-79-43169-2
  3. Fisher E, Mahajan RL, Mitcham C (2006) Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within. Bull Sci Technol Soc 26(6):485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Flipse SM, Van der Sanden MCA, Van der Velden T, Fortuin FTJM, Omta SWF, Osseweijer P (2013) Identifying key performance indicators in food technology contract R&D. J Eng Technol Manag 30:72–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flipse SM, Van Dam KH, Stragier J, Oude Vrielink TJC, Van der Sanden MCA (2015) Operationalizing responsible research and innovation in industry through decision support in innovation practice. J Chain Netw Sci 15(2):135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hin G, Daigney M, Haudebault D, Raskin K, Bouche Y, Pavie X, Carthy D (2014) Introduction to a guide to entrepreneurs and innovation support organizations. EU funded project report by Paris Region Enterprises and Knowledge Acceleration Responsible Innovation Meta (KARIM) network 1–60. (Nahuis R, Moors EHM, Smits REHM, (2012) User producer interaction in context. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79(6):1121–1134)Google Scholar
  7. Ravn T, Nielsen MW, Mejlgaard N (2015) Metrics and indicators of responsible research and innovation. Progress report D3.2 of the EU-funded Monitoring the Evolution and Benefits of Responsible Research and Innovation (MoRRI) project. 1–92Google Scholar
  8. Scholten V, Cuppen E, Flipse S, Calon R, Van den Hoven J (2016) Rewarding RRI—a case study collection of the european foundations award for responsible research and innovation. A publication of the King Baudouin Foundation, pp 1–85Google Scholar
  9. Schuurbiers D, Fisher E (2009) Lab-scale intervention. EMBO Rep 10(5):424–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tepic M, Kemp R, Omta O, Fortuin F (2013) Complexities in innovation management in companies from the European industry a path model of innovation project performance determinants. Eur J Innov Manag 16(4):517–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Van der Panne G, Van Beers C, Kleinknecht A (2003) Success and failure of innovation: a literature review. Int J Innov Manag 7(3):1–30Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands

Personalised recommendations