Skip to main content

Player Expectations of Animal Incorporated Computer Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (INTETAIN 2017)

Abstract

Animal incorporated games were both hypothesized and shown to serve multiple desired objectives, among which improvement of animal welfare, strengthening pet-owner relations, and creating new experiences for human players. We study the expected player experience of animal incorporated games through the use of an extended survey (n = 177). Our results indicate that respondents expect (a) added unpredictability caused by animal-opponent behavior, (b) increased enjoyment when playing against animals, for a limited duration of time, and (c) that hypothetical exact simulation of animal behavior offers equally interesting opponent behavior. Furthermore, concerns of animal welfare significantly moderate the preference for computer-, exact simulated- or animal-opponents. These outcomes can be used to correct for aspects such as novelty bias, when measuring player experiences in animal incorporated type games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 60.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://goo.gl/forms/5Zy5nachA5.

  2. 2.

    As one respondent indicated on the survey, “I do not like crickets!”.

References

  1. Riedel-Kruse, I.H., Chung, A.M., Dura, B., Hamilton, A.L., Lee, B.C.: Design, engineering and utility of biotic games. Lab Chip 11(1), 14–22 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0LC00399A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Purina Friskies: Games for Cats (2011). https://www.gamesforcats.com

  3. Wilson, S.: Protozoa Games (2003). http://userwww.sfsu.edu/swilson/art/protozoagames/protogames10.html

  4. Geurtsen, A., Lamers, M.H., Schaaf, M.J.M.: Interactive digital gameplay can lower stress hormone levels in home alone dogs—a case for animal welfare informatics. In: Chorianopoulos, K., Divitini, M., Hauge, J.B., Jaccheri, L., Malaka, R. (eds.) ICEC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9353, pp. 238–251. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24589-8_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. van Eck, W., Lamers, M.H.: Animal controlled computer games: playing Pac-Man against real crickets. In: Harper, R., Rauterberg, M., Combetto, M. (eds.) ICEC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4161, pp. 31–36. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11872320_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. van Eck, W., Lamers, M.H.: Biological content generation: evolving game terrains through living organisms. In: Johnson, C., Carballal, A., Correia, J. (eds.) EvoMUSART 2015. LNCS, vol. 9027, pp. 224–235. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16498-4_20

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fagen, R.: Animal Play Behaviour. Oxford University Press, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, P.K.: Play in Animals and Humans. Blackwell Pub, Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mancini, C.: Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto. Interactions 18(4), 69–73 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978822.1978836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Noz, F., An, J.: Cat cat revolution: an interspecies gaming experience. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2661–2664 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979331

  11. Tan, R.T.K.C., Cheok, A.D., Peiris, R., Todorovic, V., Loi, H.C., Loh, C.W., Derek, T.B.S.: Metazoa ludens: mixed reality interactions and play for small pets and humans. Leonardo 41(3), 308–309 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2008.41.3.308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Westerlaken, M., Stefano G.: Felino: the philosophical practice of making an interspecies videogame. In: The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference, pp. 1–12 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alfrink, K., van Peer, I., Lagerweij, H., Driessen, C., Bracke, M.: Playing with Pigs (2012). http://www.playingwithpigs.nl

  14. Wirman, H.: Games for/with strangers-captive orangutan (pongo pygmaeus) touch screen play. Antennae 30, 105–115 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Extra Pop.: Games for dogs (2015). http://www.bicshare.com

  16. Baskin, S., Zamansky, A., Kononova, V.: Exploring human perceptions of dog tablet playful interactions. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2995257.3012023

  17. Youtube: African Bull Frog ant crusher (2011). youtu.be/WlEzvdlYRes

  18. Lee, S.A., Bumbacher, E., Chung, A.M., Cira, N., Walker, B., Park, J.Y., Starr, B., Blikstein, P., Riedel-Kruse, I.H.: Trap it!: a playful human-biology interaction for a museum installation. In: Proceedings of 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702220

  19. Youtube: Fish plays Pokemon: pallet town syndrome (2014). youtu.be/48-qOC4fCdk

  20. Young, D.: Lumberjacked (2005). http://classic.rhizome.org/artbase/artwork/35526

  21. Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Habegger, S., Steiner, Y., Groner, R.: Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(5), 2274–2291 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rouse, R.: Game Design: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Jones and Barlett Publishers, Sudbury (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mancini, C., Zamansky, A.: Charting unconquered territories: intelligent systems for animal welfare. In: 40th Annual Convention of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, pp. 181–182 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harvey, H., Havard, M., Magnus, D., Cho, M.K., Riedel-Kruse, I.H.: Innocent fun or ‘microslavery’. Hastings Cent. Rep. 44(6), 38–46 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.386

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wim van Eck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

van Eck, W., Lamers, M.H. (2018). Player Expectations of Animal Incorporated Computer Games. In: Chisik, Y., Holopainen, J., Khaled, R., Luis Silva, J., Alexandra Silva, P. (eds) Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. INTETAIN 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 215. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73062-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73062-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73061-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73062-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics