Skip to main content

Signs of Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover A Return to Social Justice
  • 355 Accesses

Abstract

Within youth justice, there are signs that a socially just approach is being developed. Initiatives such as positive youth justice, Children First Offenders Second, and the Surrey model all utilise aspects of social justice, and have been praised for their innovation. This chapter considers all of these approaches in relation to the applied principles of social justice, and identifies areas of good practice. Whilst change is occurring in isolated areas, and has been noticed by policymakers, for this to be applied in a truly effective way, we need to consider why this works, rather than simply what works. This chapter argues that unless we consider the underlying values, ideology, and principles of youth justice, the same issues will reoccur again and again. To develop a system of youth justice that carries out work that is both efficient and effective, those within the system need to accept that their work has inherently philosophical roots, and allow this to support the organisation and resulting practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson, M., Wilkin, A., Doherty, P., & Kinder, K. (2002). Multi-agency working: A detailed study. Slough: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T. (2011). “We now breach more kids in a week than we used to in a whole year”: The punitive turn, enforcement and custody. Youth Justice, 11(2), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D. B. (2013). Conceptualising risk and need: The rise of actuarialism and the death of welfare? Practitioner assessment and intervention in the youth offending service. Youth Justice, 13(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, R., & Appleton, C. (2004). Joined-up youth justice: Tackling youth crime in partnership. Lyme Regis: Russell House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., & Case, S. (2016). Towards a positive youth justice. Safer Communities, 15(2), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, S., & Haines, K. (2004). Promoting prevention: Evaluating a multi-agency initiative of youth consultation and crime prevention in Swansea. Children and Society, 18(5), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, S., & Haines, K. (2015a). Children first, offenders second: The centrality of engagement in positive youth justice. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 54(2), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, S., & Haines, K. (2015b). Positive youth justice: Children first, offenders second. London: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavadino, M., & Dignan, J. (2006). Penal systems: A comparative approach. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creaney, S. (2012). Targeting, labelling and stigma: Challenging the criminalisation of children and young people. Criminal Justice Matters, 89(1), 16–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, F. (2016). Secure schools are not the answer [online]. Available from http://howardleague.org/blog/secure-schools-are-not-the-answer/. 12 Oct 2017.

  • Goldson, B. (2000). The new youth justice. Dorset: Russell House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldson, B. (2013). “Unsafe, unjust and harmful to wider society”: Grounds for raising the minimum age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales. Youth Justice, 13(2), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., & Case, S. (2012). Is the scaled approach a failed approach? Youth Justice, 12(3), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, A., Goldson, B., Haycox, A., & Houten, R. (2012). Evaluation of the Youth Justice Liaison and Diversion (YJLD) Pilot scheme final report. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., Case, S., Davies, K., & Charles, A. (2013). The Swansea Bureau: A model of diversion from the Youth Justice System. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 41(2), 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine, J., Urwin, J., & Welford, J. (2016). A review of how mental health services are organised and delivered for young people in contact with Youth Offending Teams in Wales. Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W. G., Piquero, A. R., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leischow, S. J., & Milstein, B. (2006). Systems thinking and modeling for public health practice. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 403–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2007). Youth justice? The impact of system contact on patterns of desistance from offending. European Journal of Criminology, 4(3), 315–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muncie, J. (2006). Governing young people: Coherence and contradiction in contemporary youth justice. Critical Social Policy, 26(4), 770–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muncie, J. (2008). The “punitive turn’’ in juvenile justice: Cultures of control and rights compliance in western Europe and the USA. Youth Justice, 8(2), 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. M., & Farrell, A. F. (2008). Reclaiming lost opportunities: Applying public health models in juvenile justice. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(10), 1159–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, C., & O’Brien, L. (2015). Unqualified teachers [online]. Available from https://fullfact.org/education/unqualified-teachers/. 12 Oct 2017.

  • Patel, V., Flisher, A. J., Hetrick, S., & McGorry, P. (2007). Mental health of young people: A global public-health challenge. Lancet, 369(9569), 1302–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, J. (2009). Beyond risk assessment: The return of repressive welfarism? In M. Barry & F. McNeill (Hrsg.), Youth offending and youth justice (S. 113–131). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, J. (2001). Korrectional Karaoke: New labour and the zombification of youth justice. Youth Justice, 1(2), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2001). Foucault’s law: The Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Youth Justice, 1(2), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souhami, A. (2009). Transforming youth justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2016). Review of the Youth Justice System in England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truss, E. (2017). Youth justice update [online]. Available from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/youth-justice-update. 9 Nov 2017.

  • Whitehead, P. (2011). Breaking the cycle or re-cycling errors: Critical comment on proposals for criminal justice reform. Critical Social Policy, 31(4), 628–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youth Justice Board. (2016). Action taken by the YJB to safeguard young people at secure training centres – Press releases – GOV.UK [online]. Available from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/action-taken-by-the-yjb-to-safeguard-young-people-at-secure-training-centres. 2 Feb 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Urwin, J. (2018). Signs of Change. In: A Return to Social Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73043-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73043-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73042-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73043-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics