Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Barriers to Acceptance of Bio-Based Substitutes: How Schema Incongruity Can Hinder the Purchase of Bio-Based Products

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Bioeconomy encompasses the production of renewable biological resources and their conversion into bio-based products with less environmental impact (e.g. bioplastics). To boost the bioeconomy, it is crucial that companies not only develop these products, but also successfully market them. However, companies are often confronted with poor product acceptance by end-consumers. Depending on the product category, different barriers to acceptance seem to prevail but these are not yet fully understood. This paper seeks to contribute to understanding and overcoming these barriers by analysing product acceptance using the schema theory. It is hypothesized that if associations with the core product attributes do not match the associations with environmentally friendly products, consumers are likely to experience schema incongruity. This rather unpleasant cognitive state can, as a consequence, induce negative a product evaluation. Therefore, adding the label ‘green’ or ‘environmentally friendly’ to inappropriate products might lead to a more widely-held negative perception of bio-based products. Consequently, this lowers consumer acceptance of the products and thus impacts upon market success. To analyse this effect, people’s associations with environmentally friendly products were tested by an Implicit Association Test. Additionally, a bio-based substitute suffering from schema incongruity was identified and examined using the empirical setting of an experiment and a questionnaire. The results show that environmentally friendly products are somewhat more strongly associated with ‘gentle’ than with ‘strong’. There was also a significant effect of congruity in the product presentation on the perception of stability and environmental friendliness. Thus, to market bio-based substitutes, companies should weaken core product characteristics like strength as little as possible by emphasizing environmental friendliness. Hence, the product presentation should focus on information regarding core attributes and market sustainability as an additional product benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Prior to this, a factor analysis was conducted that confirmed that the attitude items could be combined into one single variable (Cronbach's alpha = .93). The items measuring willingness to buy and use the product could be combined to one variable as well (Cronbach's alpha = .92). Items were measured on a bipolar scale (semantic differential).

References

  • Anderson JR (2015) Cognitive psychology and its implications, 8th edn. Worth, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Balderjahn I, Buerke A, Kirchgeorg M, Peyer M, Seegebarth B, Wiedmann K-P (2013) Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability. AMS Review 3(4):181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beise M, Rennings K (2005) Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecol Econ 52(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belz F-M, Peattie K (2009) Sustainability marketing: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Belz F-M, Schmidt-Riediger B (2009) Marketing strategies in the age of sustainable development: evidence from the food industry. Bus Strategy Environ 19(7):401–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Binsack M (2003) Akzeptanz neuer Produkte: Vorwissen als Determinante des Innovationserfolgs, Gabler Edition Wissenschaft Forschungsgruppe Konsum und Verhalten, 1st edn. Dt. Univ.-Verl, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bioökonomierat (2015) Auf dem Weg zur biobasierten Wirtschaft. Available at: http://www.biooekonomierat.de/fileadmin/Publikationen/Sonstige/Der_Biooekonomierat.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2015

  • Bruhn M, Kirchgeorg M (2007) Marktorientierte Führung im Wandel von Umweltbewusstsein und ökologischen Rahmenbedingungen. In: Bruhn M, Kirchgeorg M, Meier J (eds) Marktorientierte Führung im wirtschaftlichen und gesellschaftlichen Wandel. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 83–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner CB (2014) Corporate Social Responsibility in der Markenkommunikation nutzen. In: Esch F-R, Tomczak T, Kernstock J, Langner T, Redler J (eds) Corporate brand management. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp 345–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington MJ, Neville BA, Whitwell GJ (2010) Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. J Bus Ethics 97(1):139–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C (2011) Feeling ambivalent about going green. J Advert 40(4):19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egloff B, Schwerdtfeger A, Schmukle SC (2005) Temporal stability of the implicit association test-anxiety. J Pers Assess 84(1):82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esch F-R, Brunner CB (2009) “Schein und Sein”, Wirtschaftswoche, pp 40–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Esch F-R, Brunner CB (2010) “Mehr als nur leere Worte?”, absatzwirtschaft, No. 4, pp 75–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Faltins R (2010) Bio-Lebensmittel in Deutschland: Kaufbarrieren und Vermarktung, Reihe Nachhaltigkeit, vol 31. Diplomica-Verl, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K, Messner C, Bluemke M (2006) Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”. A logical and psychometric critique of the implicit association test (IAT). European Rev Soc Psychol 17(1):74–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske ST, Linville PW (1980) What does the schema concept buy us? Pers Soc Psychol Bull 6(4):543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleim MR, Smith JS, Andrews D, Cronin JJ (2013) Against the green: a multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. J Retail 89(1):44–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein EB (2011) Cognitive psychology, 3. ed., international student ed., special ed. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Belmont, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourville JT (2006) Wann Kunden neue Produkte kaufen. Harvard Bus Manag 28(8):44–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74(6):1464–1480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR (2003) Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol 85(2):197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws KL, Winterich KP, Naylor RW (2014) Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. J Consum Psychol 24(3):336–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson J (2011) Consumer eco-innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics. Bus Strategy Environ 20(3):192–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson J, Marell A, Nordlund A (2010) Green consumer behavior: determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. J Consum Market 27(4):358–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jhang JH, Grant SJ, Campbell MC (2012) Get it? Got it. Good! Enhancing new product acceptance by facilitating resolution of extreme incongruity. J Mark Res 49(2):247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalafatis SP, Pollard M, East R, Tsogas MH (1999) Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: a cross-market examination. J Consum Market 16(5):441–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P (2011) Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. J Market 75(4):132–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber-Riel W, Gröppel-Klein A (2013) Konsumentenverhalten, 10th edn. Vahlen, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchs MG, Naylor RW, Irwin JR, Raghunathan R (2010) The sustainability liability: potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. J Market 74(5):18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler G (1982) The structure of value: accounting for taste. In: Clark MS, Fiske ST (eds) Affect and cognition: the 17th annual Carnegie symposium. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 3–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy J, Tybout AM (1989) Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. J Consum Res 16(1):39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabih M, Bloem SG, Poisez TBC (1997) Conceptual issue in the study of innovation adoption behavior. Adv Consum Res 24(1):190–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottman JA (1998) Green marketing: opportunity for innovation, 2nd edn. NTC Business Books, Lincolnwood, Ill

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozaki R (2011) Adopting sustainable innovation: what makes consumers sign up to green electricity? Bus Strategy Environ 20(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Baker J, Ozaki R (2008) Pro-environmental products: marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. J Consum Market 25(5):281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prothero A, Dobscha S, Freund J, Kilbourne WE, Luchs MG, Ozanne LK, Thøgersen J (2011) Sustainable consumption: opportunities for consumer research and public policy. J Public Policy Market 30(1):31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram S, Sheth JN (1989) Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. J Consum Market 6(2):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeld K-M, Rennings K, Ziegler A (2007) Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 61(1):91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson TS (1971) Innovative behavior and communication, Editors’ series in marketing. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal ZV (1988) Appraisal of the self-schema construct in cognitive models of depression. Psychol Bull 103(2):147–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KT, Brower TR (2012) Longitudinal study of green marketing strategies that influence Millennials. J Strateg Market 20(6):535–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smits M, Wald D, Vismans D, Huet E (2014) When social responsibility leads to growth No. 6, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujan M (1985) Consumer knowledge: effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. J Consum Res 12(1):31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner C, Wölfing Kast S (2003) Promoting sustainable consumption: determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychol Market 20(10):883–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate K, Stewart AJ, Daly M (2014) Influencing green behaviour through environmental goal priming: the mediating role of automatic evaluation. J Environ Psychol 38:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teige S, Schnabel K, Banse R, Asendorpf JB (2004) Assessment of multiple implicit self-concept dimensions using the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task(EAST). Eur J Pers 18(6):495–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen J (1999) The ethical consumer. Moral norms and packaging choice. J Consum Policy 22(4):439–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke PW, Yekovich FR (1980) A critique of schema-based theories of human story memory. Poetics 9(1–3):23–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umweltbundesamt (2013) Green products in Germany 2014. Status Quo and Trends. Available at: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/378/publikationen/uba_green_in_germany_2014.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2015

  • van Doorn J, Verhoef PC (2011) Willingness to pay for organic products: differences between virtue and vice foods. Int J Res Mark 28(3):167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vantomme D, Geuens M, DeHouwer J, DePelsmacker P (2006) Explicit and implicit determinants of fair-trade buying behaviour. Adv Consum Res 33:699–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiber R, Rosendahl T (1997) Anwendungsprobleme der Conjoint-Analyse. Die Eignung conjointanalytischer Untersuchungsansätze zur Abbildung realer Entscheidungsprozesse. Mark ZFP 19(2):107–118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SVI-Endowed Chair of Marketing, esp. E-Commerce and Cross-Media Management, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Jahnallee 59, 04109, Leipzig, Germany

    Katja Rudolph

Authors
  1. Katja Rudolph
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Rudolph .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Sciences, HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  2. “Constantin Brancusi” University of Târgu Jiu, Târgu Jiu, Romania

    Diana Mihaela Pociovălișteanu

  3. Department of Management, College of Business, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

    Paulo Roberto Borges de Brito

  4. Institute for Agrarian & Regional Development, Federal University of Southern and Southeastern Pará, Marabá, Pará, Brazil

    Ismar Borges de Lima

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rudolph, K. (2018). Barriers to Acceptance of Bio-Based Substitutes: How Schema Incongruity Can Hinder the Purchase of Bio-Based Products. In: Leal Filho, W., Pociovălișteanu, D., Borges de Brito, P., Borges de Lima, I. (eds) Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation