Skip to main content

Constructing a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Multi-scalar Perceptions of Sustainability

Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Bioenergy holds significant promise to mitigate the climate-related problems associated with fossil fuel use in heat, electricity, and transportation fuel production. Many governments are encouraging bioeconomy growth with new policies. International trade between bioenergy producing and consuming nations has increased over the years. Developed countries with significant greenhouse gas emission (GHG) emission reduction goals are replacing fossil fuels with bioenergy, creating new export commodities for developing nations. However, increased bioeconomy development can put local social, economic, and environmental conditions in bioenergy producing areas at risk. To minimize the potentially adverse impacts of bioenergy development on existing socioeconomic and environmental conditions, several sustainability certification programs have recently been developed. However, there may be significant differences in how actors across multiple scales, including international non-governmental organizations, state and national governments, and local community members perceive a sustainable bioeconomy. In this chapter, we look specifically at two bioenergy development cases, one in the context of economic development in Latin America (jatropha-based bioenergy development in Yucatan, Mexico) and another in the context of a post-industrialized nation (wood-based bioenergy development in Wisconsin, USA) to understand how different actors view sustainability. Our conclusions suggest that, first, developing a sustainable bioeconomy requires addressing sustainability in all stages in the supply chain, and that, second, community perceptions matter in developing a sustainable bioeconomy, thus there is value in a bottom-up approach to policymaking.

Keywords

  • Bioenergy development
  • Bioenergy policy
  • Public perceptions of bioenergy

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
EUR   29.95
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR   213.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR   274.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR   274.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilar FX, Song N, Shifley S (2011) Review of consumption trends and public policies promoting woody biomass as an energy feedstock in the US. Biomass Bioenerg 35(8):3708–3718

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bain C (2011) Local ownership of ethanol plants: what are the effects on communities? Biomass Bioenergy 35(4):1400–1407

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee A, Schelly C, Halvorsen KE (2017) Understanding public perceptions of wood-based electricity production in Wisconsin, United States: place-based dynamics and Social Representations. Environ Sociol 23:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker DR, Larson D, Lowell EC (2009) Financial considerations of policy options to enhance biomass utilization for reducing wildfire hazards. Forest Policy and Economics 11(8):628–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker DR, Moseley C, Lee C (2011) A supply chain analysis framework for assessing state-level forest biomass utilization policies in the United States. Biomass Bioenerg 35(4):1429–1439

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Biernacki P, Waldorf D (1981) Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Methods Res 10(2):141–163

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Efroymson RA, Kline KL, Langholtz MH, Leiby PN, Oladosu GA, Davis MR, Downing ME, Hilliard MR (2013) Indicators for assessing socioeconomic sustainability of bioenergy systems: a short list of practical measures. Ecol Ind 26:87–102

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas MA, Montes-Sancho MJ (2011) US state policies for renewable energy: context and effectiveness. Energy Policy 39(5):2273–2288

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitropoulos A, Kontoleon A (2009) Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: a choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands. Energy Policy 37(5):1842–1854

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds A (2012) Comparative public policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornburg V, van Dam J, Faaij A (2007) Estimating GHG emission mitigation supply curves of large-scale biomass use on a country level. Biomass Bioenerg 31(1):46–65

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner DW (2001) Globalization and policy convergence. Int Stud Rev 3(1):53–78

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • DSIRE; Database for State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (2016) Incentives/policies by State: federal: policies for renewables and efficiency. Available online 6 June 2016 http://programs.dsireusa.org/system/program?state=WI

  • Durst PB, McKenzie PJ, Brown CL, Appanah S (2006) Challenges facing certification and eco-labelling of forest products in developing countries. Int For Rev 8(2):193–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastmond A, Garcia C, Fuentes A, Becerril-Garcia J (2014) Mexico. In: Solomon BD, Bailis R (eds) Sustainable development of biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean. Springer, New York, pp 203–222

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ekardt F, Von Bredow H (2012) Extended emissions trading versus sustainability criteria: managing the ecological and social ambivalences of bioenergy. Renew Energy Law Policy Rev, 49–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (2004) Step changes for decarbonising the energy system: research needs for renewables, energy efficiency and nuclear power. Energy Policy 32(17):1891–1904

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eltham DC, Harrison GP, Allen SJ (2008) Change in public attitudes towards a Cornish wind farm: implications for planning. Energy Policy 36(1):23–33

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Evans AM, Perschel RT, Kittler BA (2013) Overview of forest biomass harvesting guidelines. J Sustain For 32(1–2):89–107

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen KE, Barnes JR, Solomon BD (2009) Upper Midwestern USA ethanol potential from cellulosic materials. Soc Nat Resour 22(10):931–938

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen KE, Selfa TA, Becker DS, Hinrichs C (eds) (2011) Special issue: socioeconomic dimensions of U.S. bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 35(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heichel S, Pape J, Sommerer T (2005) Is there convergence in convergence research? An overview of empirical studies on policy convergence. J Eur Publ Policy 12(5):817–840

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick S, Kovach J, Padley E, Wagner C, Zastrow D (2009) Wisconsin’s forestland woody biomass harvesting guidelines. WI DNR Division of Forestry and Wisconsin Council on Forestry, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Junginger M, Goh CS, Faaij A (eds) (2013) International bioenergy trade: history, status & outlook on securing sustainable bioenergy supply, demand and markets, vol 52. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaa P, Mickwitz P (2011) Public policy as a part of transforming energy systems: framing bioenergy in Finnish energy policy. J Clean Prod 19(16):1812–1821

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laird FN, Stefes C (2009) The diverging paths of German and United States policies for renewable energy: sources of difference. Energy Policy 37(7):2619–2629

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lantiainen S, Song N (2015) Review and comparative analysis of US and EU public policies promoting wood energy. In: Dell G, Egger C (eds) World sustainable energy days next 2014. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, pp 89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipp J (2007) Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 35(11):5481–5495

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Manning P, Taylor G, Hanley ME (2015) Bioenergy, food production and biodiversity—an unlikely alliance? GCB Bioenergy 7(4):570–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagar AD, Kartha S (2007) Bioenergy and sustainable development? Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:131–167

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Selfa T, Bain C, Moreno R, Eastmond A, Sweitz S, Bailey C, Pereira GS, Souza T, Medeiros R (2015) Interrogating social sustainability in the biofuels sector in Latin America: tensions between global standards and local experiences in Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. Environ Manage 56(6):1315–1329

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon BD, Barnes JR, Halvorsen KE (2007) Grain and cellulosic ethanol: history, economics, and energy policy. Biomass Bioenerg 31(6):16–25

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon BD, Banerjee A, Acevedo A, Halvorsen KE, Eastmond A (2015) Policies for the sustainable development of biofuels in the pan American region: a review and synthesis of five countries. Environ Manage 56(6):1276–1294

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sorda G, Banse M, Kemfert C (2010) An overview of biofuel policies across the world. Energy Policy 38(11):6977–6988

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie C, Yu F (2007) Mixed methods sampling a typology with examples. J Mixed Methods Res 1(1):77–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Tongco MDC (2007) Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Res Appl 5:147–158

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wiser R, Porter K, Grace R (2005) Evaluating experience with renewables portfolio standards in the United States. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 10(2):237–263

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Witzel A (2000) The problem-centered interview. For Qual Soc Res 1(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35(5):2683–2691

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zoellner J, Schweizer-Ries P, Wemheuer C (2008) Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany. Energy Policy 36(11):4136–4141

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation’s Partnerships in International Research and Education (PIRE) Program

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chelsea L. Schelly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Banerjee, A., Schelly, C.L., Halvorsen, K.E. (2018). Constructing a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Multi-scalar Perceptions of Sustainability. In: Leal Filho, W., Pociovălișteanu, D., Borges de Brito, P., Borges de Lima, I. (eds) Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_19

Download citation