Advertisement

The Role of Digital Technologies in Facilitating Intergenerational Learning in Heritage Tourism

  • Pierre Benckendorff
  • Iis P. TussyadiahEmail author
  • Caroline Scarles
Conference paper

Abstract

This research proposes a framework of intergenerational learning (IGL) that supports child-to-parent influence in the context of heritage learning using augmented reality (AR) and serious game applications. Positioning children as the behavioural catalysts in the learning process, the framework is developed based on several considerations and requirements. First, the technologies are designed to play a role in attracting and engaging children in learning and providing an intergenerational participation structure to allow children to influence parents’ attitudes and behaviour. Second, using the mechanics, dynamics, and aesthetics framework of game design, the game elements are designed to provide realistic context for experiential learning, informative guiding and player interactions to increase engagement, as well as clear and measurable success indicators to increase motivation. The outcome of this framework is attitude and behaviour change in children and parents with regards to heritage preservation and appreciation, which is one of the main goals of heritage tourism managers.

Keywords

Intergenerational learning Child-to-parent influence Attitude change Behavioural catalyst Augmented reality Serious game 

References

  1. Adams, M., Luke, J., Ancelet, J.: Family learning in art museum interactive spaces: a literature review. Engage Int. J. Vis. Art Gallery Educ. 25, 19–30 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, P.J.: Children as intergenerational environmental change agents: using a negotiated protocol to foster environmentally responsible behaviour in the family home. Doctoral Thesis, University of Wollongong (2016)Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E.F., McLoughlin, L., Liarokapis, F., Peters, C., Petridis, P., de Freitas, S.: Developing serious games for cultural heritage: a state-of-the-art review. Virtual Reality 14(4), 255–275 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angelopoulou, A., Economou, D., Bouki, V., Psarrou, A., Jin, L., Pritchard, C., Kolyda, F.: Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Wireless Middleware, Operating Systems, and Applications, pp. 15–22 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Ardito, C., Costabile, M.F., Lanzilotti, R., Simeone, A.L.: Combining multimedia resources for an engaging experience of cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of SAPMIA 2010, 29 October 2010, Firenze, Italy (2010)Google Scholar
  6. Ballantyne, R., Connell, S., Fien, J.: Factors contributing to intergenerational communication regarding environmental programs: preliminary research findings. Aust. J. Environ. Educ. 14, 1–10 (1998a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballantyne, R., Connell, S., Fien, J.: Students as catalysts of environmental change: a framework for researching intergenerational influence through environmental education. Environ. Educ. Res. 4(3), 285–298 (1998b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ballantyne, R., Fien, J., Packer, J.: Program effectiveness in facilitating intergenerational influence in environmental education: lessons from the field. J. Environ. Educ. 32(4), 8–15 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berey, L.A., Pollay, R.W.: The influencing role of the child in family decision making. J. Mark. Res. 5, 70–72 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borun, M., Cleghom, A., Garfield, C.: Family learning in museums: a bibliographic review. Curator Mus. J. 38(4), 262–270 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borun, M., Chambers, M., Cleghorn, A.: Families are learning in science museums. Curator Mus. J. 39(2), 123–138 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boudet, H., Ardoin, N., Flora, J., Armel, K., Desai, M., Robinson, T.: Effects of a behaviour change intervention for Girl Scouts on child and parent energy-saving behaviours. Nat. Energy 1 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.91
  13. Bourque, C.M., Houseal, A.K., Welsh, K.M., Wenger, M.: Free-choice family learning: a literature review for the National Park Service. J. Interpret. Res. 19(1), 7 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. Brown, R., Ohsako, T.: A study of inter-generational programmes for schools promoting international education in developing countries through the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme. J. Res. Int. Educ. 2(2), 151–165 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng, K.H., Tsai, C.C.: The interaction of child–parent shared reading with an augmented reality (AR) picture book and parents’ conceptions of AR learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47(1), 203–222 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiong, C.: Can Video Games Promote Intergenerational Play and Literacy Learning?. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Correa, T.: Bottom-up technology transmission within families: exploring how youths influence their parents’ digital media use with dyadic data. J. Commun. 64(1), 103–124 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. D’amore, C.: Family nature clubs: an intergenerational opportunity to foster love of the natural world. Fam. Relat. Soc. 5(3), 431–446 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dieleman, H., Huisingh, D.: Games by which to learn and teach about sustainable development: exploring the relevance of games and experiential learning for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 14, 837–847 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dindler, C., Iversen, O.S., Smith, R., Veerasawmy, R.: Participatory design at the museum—Inquiring into children’s everyday engagement in cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of OZCHI 2010, 22–26 November 2010, Brisbane, Australia (2010)Google Scholar
  21. Duvall, J., Zint, M.: A review of research on the effectiveness of environmental education in promoting intergenerational learning. J. Environ. Educ. 38(4), 14–24 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. Facer, K.: Learning Futures: Education, Technology and Social Change. Routledge, London (2011)Google Scholar
  23. Falk, J.H., Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Benckendorff, P.: Travel and learning: a neglected tourism research area. Ann. Tourism Res. 39(2), 908–927 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foxman, E.R., Tansuhaj, P.S., Ekstrom, K.M.: Family members’ perceptions of adolescents’ influence in family decision making. J. Consum. Res. 15(4), 482–491 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Froschauer, J., Arends, M., Goldfarb, D., Merkl, D.: A serious heritage game for art history: Design and evaluation of ThIATRO. Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM), 2012 18th International Conference on. IEEE, (2012)Google Scholar
  26. Gamliel, T., Gabay, N.: Knowledge exchange, social interactions, and empowerment in an intergenerational technology program at school. Educ. Gerontol. 40(8), 597–617 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hammady, R., Ma, M., Temple, N.: Augmented reality and gamification in heritage museums. In: Proceedings of Joint International Conference on Serious Games 2016, pp. 181–187 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. Hike, D.D.: The family as a learning system: an observational study of families in museums. Marriage Fam. Rev. 13(3–4), 101–129 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ho, C.Y.: Intergenerational learning (between generation X & Y) in learning families: a narrative inquiry. Int. Educ. Stud. 3(4), 59–72 (2010)Google Scholar
  30. Huizenga, J., Admiraal, W., Akkerman, S., ten Dam, G.: Mobile game-based learning in secondary education: engagement, motivation and learning in a mobile city game. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. (2009)Google Scholar
  31. Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., Zubek, R.: MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI. 4(1), (2004)Google Scholar
  32. Istead, L., Shapiro, B.: Recognizing the child as knowledgeable other: Intergenerational learning research to consider child-to-adult influence on parent and family eco-knowledge. J. Res. Childhood Educ. 28(1), 115–127 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kanhadilok, P., Watts, M.: Adult play-learning: observing informal family education at a science museum. Stud. Educ. Adults 46(1), 23–41 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kenner, C., Ruby, M., Jessel, J., Gregory, E., Arju, T.: Intergenerational learning between children and grandparents in East London. J. Early Childhood Res. 5(3), 219–243 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kenner, C., Ruby, M., Jessel, J., Gregory, E., Arju, T.: Bilingual learning for second and third generation children. Language, Culture and Curriculum 21(2), 120–137 (2008)Google Scholar
  36. Kiefer, P., Matyas, S., Schlieder, C.: Learning about cultural heritage by playing geogames. In: Harper, R., Rauterberg, M., Combetto, M. (eds.) Proceedings of ICEC 2006, pp. 217–228 (2006)Google Scholar
  37. Kopczak, C., Kisiel, J.F., Rowe, S.: Families talking about ecology at touch tanks. Environ. Educ. Res. 21(1), 129–144 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larsen, J., Svabo, C.: The tourist gaze and “Family Treasure Trails” in museums. Tourist Stud. 14(2), 105–125 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maddox, P., Doran, C., Williams, I.D., Kus, M.: The role of intergenerational influence in waste education programmes: the THAW project. Waste Manag. 31(12), 2590–2600 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Newman, S., Hatton-Yeo, A.: Intergenerational learning and the contributions of older people. Ageing Horiz. 8(10), 31–39 (2008)Google Scholar
  41. Öllerer, K.: Environmental education—the bumpy road from childhood foraging to literacy and active responsibility. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 12(3), 205–216 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pearce, P.L., Foster, F.: A “university of travel”: backpacker learning. Tour. Manag. 28(5), 1285–1298 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Räisänen, T., Ypsilanti, A., Ropes, D., Vivas, A.B., Viitala, M., Ijäs, T.: Examining the requirements for an intergenerational learning game. Educ. Inf. Technol. 19(3), 531–547 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roksa, J., Potter, D.: Parenting and academic achievement: intergenerational transmission of educational advantage. Sociol. Educ. 84(4), 299–321 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ropes, D.: Intergenerational learning in organizations. Eur. J. Training Dev. 37(8), 713–727 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siyahhan, S., Barab, S.A., Downton, M.P.: Using activity theory to understand intergenerational play: the case of Family Quest. Comput.-Support. Collaborative Learn. 5, 415–432 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stom, R., Strom, P.: A paradigm for intergenerational learning. In: London, M. (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Lifelong Learning, pp. 133–146. Oxford University Press (2011)Google Scholar
  48. Stone, M.J., Petrick, J.F.: The educational benefits of travel experiences: a literature review. J. Travel Res. 52(6), 731–744 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sung, H.Y., Siraj-Blatchford, J.: Supporting family learning and interaction through information and communications technology in public libraries in Taiwan. J. Librarianship Inf. Sci. 47(4), 294–302 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tempest, S.: Intergenerational learning: a reciprocal knowledge development process that challenges the language of learning. Manag. Learn. 34(2), 181–200 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Uzzell, D.: Education for environmental action in the community: new roles and relationships. Camb. J. Educ. 29, 397–413 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vaughan, C., Gack, J., Solorazano, H., Ray, R.: The effect of environmental education on schoolchildren, their parents, and community members: a study of intergenerational and intercommunity learning. J. Environ. Educ. 34(3), 12–21 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ward, S., Wackman, D.B.: Children’s purchase influence attempts and parental yielding. J. Mark. Res. 9(3), 316–319 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weber, J.: Gaming and gamification in Tourism: 10 ways to make tourism more playful. Digital Tourism Think Tank, pp. 1–14 (2014)Google Scholar
  55. Xu, F., Tian, F., Buhalis, D., Weber, J., Zhang, H.: Tourists as mobile gamers: gamification for tourism marketing. J. Travel Tourism Mark. 33(8), 1124–1142 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ypsilanti, A., Vivas, A.B., Räisänen, T., Viitala, M., Ijäs, T., Ropes, D.: Are serious video games something more than a game? A review on the effectiveness of serious games to facilitate intergenerational learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. 19(3), 515–529 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zimmerman, H.T., McClain, L.R.: Exploring the outdoors together: assessing family learning in environmental education. Stud. Educ. Eval. 41, 38–47 (2014a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimmerman, H.T., McClain, L.R.: Intergenerational learning at a nature center: families using prior experiences and participation frameworks to understand raptors. Environ. Educ. Res. 20(2), 177–201 (2014b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zimmerman, H.T., Land, S.M., McClain, L.R., Mohney, M.R., Choi, G.W., Salman, F.H.: Tree investigators: supporting families’ scientific talk in an arboretum with mobile computers. Int. J. Sci. Educ., Part B 5(1), 44–67 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Benckendorff
    • 1
  • Iis P. Tussyadiah
    • 2
    Email author
  • Caroline Scarles
    • 2
  1. 1.UQ Business SchoolUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  2. 2.School of Hospitality and Tourism ManagementUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations