Advertisement

Accepting and Circumventing Native Speaker Essentialism

  • Robert Weekly
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 35)

Abstract

This chapter reports on a qualitative study of multilingual South-Asian English language teachers working in an ESOL department in Leicester. Through narrative interviews and focus groups the study explored how the participants experience linguicism, which positions them as inauthentic native English speakers (NES) or non-native English speakers (NNES). Several of the participants are also complicit in this, with many resisting a NES label or feeling some ambiguity with their native speaker status. One of the reasons for this, is that the NES/NNES dichotomy is embedded in the ideology of English language teaching and the ideological values of society. NES is semantically linked with other terminology, such as British English, RP, ‘whiteness’, Standard English, correct English and good English. In attempting to overcome prejudice, rather than identifying themselves as NES, the participants emphasised their multilingualism and presented stories of teaching practices. Therefore, while tending to accept essentialised identity construction by others, the participants utilized other aspects of their identity to overcome prejudice in the workplace.

References

  1. Amin, N. (2004). Nativism, the native speaker construct, and minority immigrant women teachers of English as a second language. In L. D. Kamhi-Stein (Ed.), Learning and teaching from experience: Perspectives on nonnative English speaking professionals (pp. 61–80). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  2. Braine, G. (2010). Nonnative speaker English teachers: Research, pedagogy, and professional growth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Brutt-Griffler, J., & Samimy, K. K. (2001). Transcending the nativeness paradigm. World Englishes, 20(1), 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, J. P. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, A. (1995). Proficiency or the native speaker: What are we trying to achieve in ELT? In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 145–158). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, A. (2004). The native speaker in applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 431–450). Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doerr, N. M. (2009). Investigating “native speaker effects”: Towards a new model of analyzing “native speaker” ideologies. In N. M. Doerr (Ed.), The native speaker concept: Ethnographic investigations of native speaker effects (pp. 15–46). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faez, F. (2011). Reconceptualizing the native/nonnative speaker dichotomy. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 10, 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farrell, T. S. C., & Martin, S. (2009). To teach standard English or world Englishes? A balanced approach to instruction. English Teaching Forum, 47(2), 2–7.Google Scholar
  13. Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Holliday, A. (2008). Standards of English and politics of inclusion. Language Teaching, 41(1), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities and identities (pp. 35–84). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jenkins, J. (1996). Native speaker, non-native speaker and English as a foreign language: Time for a change. IATEFL Newsletter. (31) (pp. 10–11)Google Scholar
  17. Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jenkins, J. (2004). Beware the natives and their norms. The Guardian [Accessed Thursday 22 January 2012]. Available at https://goo.gl/p8OAIX
  19. Jenkins, J. (2007). English as lingua franca: Attitude and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kachru, B. B. (1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions and models of non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd..Google Scholar
  21. Kachru, B. B. (2004). Asian Englishes: Beyond the canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kubota, R. (2009). Rethinking the superiority of the native speaker: Towards a relational understanding of power. In N. M. Doerr (Ed.), The native speaker concept: Ethnographic investigations of native speaker effects (pp. 233–248). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  23. Kubota, R., & Lin, A. (2006). Race and TESOL: Introduction to concepts and theories. TESOL Quarterly, 40(3), 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kubota, R., & Lin, A. (2009). Race, culture, and identities in second language education: Introduction to research and practice. In R. Kubota & A. Lin (Eds.), Race, culture, and identities in second language education (pp. 1–24). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Leung, C., Harris, R., & Rampton, B. (1997). The idealized native speaker, reified ethnicities and classroom realities. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 543–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leung, C., Harris, R., & Rampton, B. (2009). The idealized native speaker, reified ethnicities, and classroom realities. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (pp. 137–140). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd..Google Scholar
  27. Liu, J. (1999). From their own perspective: The impact of non-native ESL professionals on their students. In G. Braine (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 159–176). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. Lo Bianco, J. (2010). Language policy and planning. In N. Hornberger (Ed.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 143–174). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  29. Lowe, R. J., & Pinner, R. (2016). Finding the connections between native-speakerism and authenticity. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(1), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meddings, L. (2004a). All the world’s an English stage. The Guardian [Accessed Thursday 22 January 2012]. Available at https://goo.gl/LQf94q
  31. Meddings, L. (2004b). Free the world from coursebook English. The Guardian [Accessed Thursday 22 January 2012]. Available at https://goo.gl/deyiw7
  32. Moussu, L. (2002). English as a second language students’ reactions to nonnative English speaking teachers. Master of the Arts Dissertation, UT, Provo, Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
  33. Moussu, L. (2006). Native and non-native English-speaking English as a second language teachers: Student attitudes, teacher self-perceptions, and intensive English program administrator beliefs and practices. Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
  34. Office for National Statistics. (2011). 2011 Census: Standard area statistics (England and Wales). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  35. Piller, I. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 6(2), 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rampton, B. (1990). Displacing the ‘native speaker’: Expertise, affiliation and inheritance. ELT Journal, 44(2), 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Weekly
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for English Language EducationUniversity of Nottingham NingboNingboChina

Personalised recommendations