Advertisement

“Legitimate” Concerns: A Duoethnography of Becoming ELT Professionals

  • Amber N. Warren
  • Jaehan Park
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 35)

Abstract

This chapter reports findings from a duoethnography of two developing ELT professionals from different linguistic and cultural backgrounds, exploring themes of marginality and acceptance in the experience of developing professional identities. Through this process, the authors seek to construct what it means to be “legitimate” ELT professionals. The authors (one a Korean citizen working at a university in the US, the other a US citizen completing a doctoral degree in the US after significant international experience) juxtapose their narratives to explore themes of marginality and acceptance in the experience of developing professional identities. Duoethnography is founded on a dialogic approach (Bakhtin, The dialogic imagination: four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press, Austin, 1981) where collaborators explore a concept or shared experience with the goal of creating new understandings or promoting change. Thus, it is a particularly appropriate choice for exploring the divergences and similarities between two individuals’ experiences in the shadow of historical and frequently narrow conceptualizations of a native/non-native dichotomy. Sharing stories of critically constructing and reconstructing our legitimacy as ELT professionals revealed different but similar processes and developed new understandings of the contexts each of us were familiar with. We share these findings and consider how they can serve to further cultivate new understandings of professional identity in local and global contexts.

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Charlotte: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkhuizen, G. (2011). Narrative knowledging in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3), 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barone, T. E. (1990). Using the narrative text as an occasion for conspiracy. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education (pp. 305–326). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bates, T., Swennen, A., & Jones, K. (2011). The professional development of teacher educators. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Block, D., & Cameron, D. (Eds.). (2002). Globalization and language teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Britzman, D. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brock, S. (2011). To perceive absence: Storying a research journey. In D. Schaafsma & R. Vinz (Eds.), On narrative inquiry: Approaches to language and literacy research (pp. 36–49). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  10. Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Multilingual writers and the academic community: Towards a critical relationship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 29–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1475-1585(02)00007-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Canagarajah, A. S. (2007). Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 923–939.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00678.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Canagarajah, A. S. (2009). Can we talk? Finding a platform for dialogue among values-based professionals in post-positive education. In M. S. Wong & A. S. Canagarajah (Eds.), Christian and critical English language educators in dialogue: Pedagogical and ethical dilemmas (pp. 75–88). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Canagarajah, A. S. (2012a). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 258–279.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Canagarajah, A. S. (2012b). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2011). A holistic approach to multilingual education: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 339–343.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01204.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1987). Teachers’ practice knowledge: What counts as “personal” in studies of the personal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 487–500.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3587717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cook, V. (2007). The goals of ELT: Reproducing native speakers or promoting multi-competence among second language users? In J. Cummins & C. Davidson (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 237–248). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Creese, A., Blackledge, A., & Takhi, J. K. (2014). The ideal ‘native speaker’ teacher: Negotiating authenticity and legitimacy in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 98(4), 937–951.  https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crumpler, T. P., Handsfield, L. J., & Dean, T. R. (2011). Constructing difference differently in language and literacy professional development. Research in the Teaching of English, 46(1), 55–91. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23050589 Google Scholar
  22. De Costa, P. I., & Norton, B. (Eds.). (2017). Transdisciplinarity and language teacher identity. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12368.
  23. Dengerink, J., Lunenberg, M., & Kools, Q. (2015). What and how teacher educators prefer to learn. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(1), 78–96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.992635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dinkelman, T. (2011). Forming a teacher educator identity: Uncertain standards, practice and relationships. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(3), 309–323.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.588020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dinkelman, T., Margolis, J., & Sikkenga, K. (2006). From teacher to teacher educator: Experiences, expectations, and expatriation. Studying Teacher Education, 2(1), 5–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960600557447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doerr, N. M. (2009). Introduction. In N. M. Doerr (Ed.), Native speaker concept: Ethnographic investigations of native speaker effects (pp. 1–12). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Holliday, A. (2006). Native-speakerism. ELT Journal, 60(4), 385–387.  https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnston, B. (1999). Putting critical pedagogy in its place: A personal account. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 557–565.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3587680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kanno, Y., & Stuart, C. (2011). Learning to become a second language teacher: Identities-in-practice. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 236–252.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01178.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kramsch, C. (1991). Culture in language learning: A view from the Unites States. In K. D. Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 217–240). John Benjamins: Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kubota, R. (2009). Rethinking the superiority of the native speaker: Toward a relational understanding of power. In N. M. Doerr (Ed.), Native speaker concept: Ethnographic investigations of native speaker effects (pp. 233–248). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  35. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lazaraton, A. (2003). Incidental displays of cultural knowledge in the nonnative-English-speaking teacher’s classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 213–245.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3588503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, J. Y. (1995). Marginality: The key to multicultural theology. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Martin-Jones, M., Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2012). The Routledge handbook of multilingualism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Matsuda, P. K. (2012). Let’s face it: Language issues and the writing program administrator. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 36(1), 141–163.Google Scholar
  40. May, S. (Ed.). (2014). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. McClellan, P., & Sader, J. (2012). Power and privilege. In J. Norris, R. D. Sawyer, & D. Lund (Eds.), Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 137–156). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  42. Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native teacher. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  43. Menard-Warwick, J. (2008). The cultural and intercultural identities of transnational English teachers: Two case studies from the Americas. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 617–640.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00151.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Millar Marsh, M. (2002). The social fashioning of teacher identities. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  45. Norris, J. (2008). Duoethnography. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 233–236). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Norris, J. (2012). Prologue. In I. J. Norris, R. D. Sawyer, & D. E. Lund (Eds.), Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 177–178). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  47. Norris, J., & Sawyer, R. D. (2012). Toward a dialogic methodology. In J. Norris, R. D. Sawyer, & D. E. Lund (Eds.), Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 9–39). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  48. Norris, J., Sawyer, R. D., & Lund, D. E. (2012). Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (Vol. 7). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  49. Norton, B., & Morgan, B. (2012). Poststructuralism. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  50. Park, J., & Pawan, F. (2016). Korean professors’ pedagogical efforts and professional development needs in English-medium instruction. In J. Crandall & M. A. Christison (Eds.), Teacher education and professional development in TESOL: Global perspectives (pp. 193–204). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Pavlenko, A. (2003). “I never knew I was a bilingual”: Reimagining teacher identities in TESOL. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 2(4), 251–268.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0204_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  53. Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 329–348.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3587668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pennycook, A. (2008). Critical applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 784–807). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Pinar, W. (1975). Currere: Toward reconceptualization. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp. 396–414). Berkeley: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  56. Rudolph, N., Selvi, A. F., & Yazan, B. (2015). Conceptualizing and confronting inequity: Approaches within and new directions for the “NNEST movement”. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(1), 27–50.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2015.997650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Salmon, P., & Riessman, C. K. (2008). Looking back on narrative research: An exchange. In M. Andrews, C. Squire, & M. Tamboulou (Eds.), Doing narrative research (pp. 78–85). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Sawyer, R. D., & Liggett, T. (2012). Shifting positionalities: A critical discussion of a duoethnographic inquiry of a personal curriculum of post/colonialism. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(5), 628–651.  https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tsui, A. B. M. (2007). Complexities of identity formation: A narrative inquiry of an EFL teacher. TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 657–680. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40264401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tsui, A. B. M., & Tollefson, J. W. (2007). Language policy, culture, and identity in Asian contexts. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  61. Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 4, 21–44.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Varghese, M. M., Motha, S., Trent, J., Park, G., & Reeves, J. (2016). Language teacher identity in multilingual settings. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 545–571.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Viczko, M., & Wright, L. L. (2010). Negotiating identities in the transition from graduate student to teacher educator. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 14–26.Google Scholar
  64. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Literacy, Language & Culture, College of EducationUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA
  2. 2.Division of Arts and HumanitiesPennsylvania State University, Abington CollegeAbingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations