Advertisement

Changing Information Management in Product-Service System PLM: Customer-Oriented Strategy

  • Alexander Smirnov
  • Nikolay ShilovEmail author
  • Andreas Oroszi
  • Mario Sinko
  • Thorsten Krebs
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 517)

Abstract

Increasing competition and appearance of new information and communication technologies makes companies to introduce new production and marketing models. The paper shares the experiences of improving PLM information management at an automation equipment manufacturer caused by implementation of product-service systems and their customer-driven configuration. Though the research results are based on the analysis of one company, the presented work can give significant input to achieve benefits for component manufacturers that tend to become system vendors in general.

Keywords

Customer-oriented view Application view Product-service-system Strategy Information management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was partially supported by projects funded by grants# 16-07-00375 of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, by the State Research no. 0073-2014-0005, and by Government of Russian Federation, Grant 074-U01.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang, M.-R., Yang, C.-C., Ho, S.-Y., Chang, C.H.: A study on enterprise under globalization competition knowledge management and creation overhead construction. J. Interdisc. Math. 17(5–6), 423–433 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2013.800299 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Erdener, K., Hassan, S.: Globalization of Consumer Markets: Structures and Strategies. Routledge, London (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and the Economy. Report of Executive Office of the President of the United States, December 2016. https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/12/20/artificial-intelligence-automation-and-economy
  4. 4.
    Bryson, J.R., Daniels, P.W. (eds.): Handbook of Service Business: Management, Marketing, Innovation and Internationalisation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    La Monica, P.R.: Is Uber really worth more than Ford and GM? CNN Money (2015). http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/27/investing/uber-ford-gm-70-billion-valuation/
  6. 6.
    Ceschin, F.: Product-service system innovation: a promising approach to sustainability. Sustainable Product-Service Systems. SAST, pp. 17–40. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03795-0_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wallin, J., Parida, V., Isaksson, O.: Understanding product-service system innovation capabilities development for manufacturing companies. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 26(5), 763–787 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2013-0055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baumeister, H.: Customer relationship management for SMEs. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference eBusiness and eWork e2002, Prague, Czech Republic (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fjermestad, J., Romano Jr., N.C.: An integrative implementation framework for electronic customer relationship management: revisiting the general principles of usability and resistance. In: Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2003), Big Island, HI, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piller, F., Schaller, C.: Individualization based collaborative customer relationship management: motives, structures, and modes of collaboration for mass customization and CRM. In: Working Paper No. 29 of the Department of General and Industrial Management, Technische Universität München (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stark, J. (ed.): Product Lifecycle Management, 365 p. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gao, S., Guo, Y., Chen, J.: The performance of knowledge collaboration in virtual teams: an empirical study. Int. J. Multimedia Ubiquit. Eng. 9(8), 193–212 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Andersson, J.: Representing human-automation challenges. Chalmers University of Technology (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felic, A., König-Ries, B., Klein, M.: Process-oriented semantic knowledge management in product lifecycle management. Procedia CIRP 25, 361–368 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smirnov, A., Kashevnik, A., Shilov, N., Oroszi, A., Sinko, M., Krebs, T.: Changing business information systems for innovative configuration processes. In: Matulevičius, R., Maggi, F.M., Küngas, P. (eds.) Joint Proceedings of the BIR 2015 Workshops and Doctoral Consortium co-located with 14th International Conference on Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2015), CEUR, vol. 1420, pp. 62–73 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smirnov, A., Kashevnik, A., Teslya, N., Shilov, N., Oroszi, A., Sinko, M., Humpf, M., Arneving, J.: Knowledge Management for Complex Product Development. In: Bernard, A., Rivest, L., Dutta, D. (eds.) PLM 2013. IAICT, vol. 409, pp. 110–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41501-2_12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bruno, G., Korf, R., Lentes, J., Zimmermann, N.: Efficient management of product lifecycle information through a semantic platform. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manage. (IJPLM) 9(1), 45–64 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Smirnov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nikolay Shilov
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Andreas Oroszi
    • 3
  • Mario Sinko
    • 3
  • Thorsten Krebs
    • 4
  1. 1.SPIIRASSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.ITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Festo AG & Co.EsslingenGermany
  4. 4.encoway GmbHBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations