BIM and PLM Associations in Current Literature

  • Giovanna MangialardiEmail author
  • Carla Di Biccari
  • Claudio Pascarelli
  • Mariangela Lazoi
  • Angelo Corallo
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 517)


Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) have been associated many times in recent literature and the possibilities for their integration or to be mutually used as a source of lesson learned has been envisaged. The paper proposes to analyze, through a systematic literature review approach, the existing state of art of previous studies that has already examined relations between BIM and PLM. The main objective of the paper is to understand the real nature of BIM-PLM association for better directing future research developments.




  1. 1.
    Saaksvuori, A., Immonen, A.: Product Lifecycle Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stark, J.: Product Lifecyle Management. Springer, London (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corallo, A., Latino, M.E., Lazoi, M., Lettera, S., Marra, M., Verardi, S.: Defining product lifecycle management: a journey across features, definitions, and concepts (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laiserin, J.: Comparing Pommes and Naranjas (2002), Cited 14 Jan 2017
  5. 5.
    Eastman, C.M.: An Outline of the Building Description System. Institute of Physical Planning, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh (1974)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Penttilä, H.: Describing the changes in architectural information technology to understand design complexity and free-form architectural expression (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Succar, B.: Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Azhar, S.: Building information modeling [BIM]: Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bryman, A., Bell, E.: Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jupp, J.R.: Cross industry learning: a comparative study of product lifecycle management and building information modelling. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manage. 9(3), 258–284 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jupp, J.R., Nepal, M.: BIM and PLM: comparing and learning from changes to professional practice across sectors. In: Fukuda, S., Bernard, A., Gurumoorthy, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2014. IAICT, vol. 442, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jupp, J.R., Singh, V.: Similar concepts, distinct solutions, common problems: learning from PLM and BIM deployment. In: Fukuda, S., Bernard, A., Gurumoorthy, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2014. IAICT, vol. 442, pp. 31–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jupp, J.R.: Incomplete BIM implementation: exploring challenges and the role of product lifecycle management functions. In: Bernard, A., Rivest, L., Dutta, D. (eds.) PLM 2013. IAICT, vol. 409, pp. 630–640. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fadli, F., Barki, H., Shaat, A., Mahdjoubi, L., Boguslawski, P., Zverovich, V.: 3D capture techniques for BIM enabled LCM. In: Bouras, A., Eynard, B., Foufou, S., Thoben, K.-D. (eds.) PLM 2015. IAICT, vol. 467, pp. 183–192. Springer, Cham (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Popov, V., Mikalauskas, S., Migilinskas, D., Vainiūnas, P.: Complex usage of 4D information modelling concept for building design, estimation, scheduling and determination of effective variant. In: Ukio Technologinis ir Ekonominis, pp. 91–98 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Migilinskasa, D., Popov, V., Juocevicius, V., Ustinovichius, L.: The benefits, obstacles and problems of practical bim implementation. In: 11th International Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST 2013. Procedia Engineering (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holzer, D.: Fostering the link from PLM to ERP via BIM. In: Fukuda, S., Bernard, A., Gurumoorthy, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2014. IAICT, vol. 442, pp. 75–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aram, S., Eastman, C.: Integration of PLM solutions and BIM systems for the AEC industry. In: Proceedings of the 30th ISARC, Montreal, Canada, pp. 1046–1055 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luming, R., Singh, V.: Comparing BIM in construction with 3D modeling in shipbuilding industries: is the grass greener on the other side? In: Bouras, A., Eynard, B., Foufou, S., Thoben, K.-D. (eds.) PLM 2015. IAICT, vol. 467, pp. 193–202. Springer, Cham (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Desprat, C., Luga, H., Jessel, J.P.: Hybrid client-server and P2P network for web-based collaborative 3D design. In: WSCG 2015 Conference on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision, Plzen, Czech Republic (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heikkilä, R., Hovila, J., Ahola, M., Nevala, K., Schäfer, T.: Digital product process for construction product industry. In: Proceedings of the 28th ISARC, Seoul, Korea, pp. 734–739 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bricogne, M., Eynard, B., Troussier, N., Antaluca, E., Ducellier, G.: Building lifecycle management: overview of technology challenges and stakeholders. In: IET International Conference on Smart and Sustainable City, ICSSC 2011, pp. 1–5. IET, Shanghai (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oberoi, S., Holzer, D.: Mechanical contractors: the key for supply chain integration in lifecycle BIM. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manage. 9(3) (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ran, L., Singh, V.: Building information modelling-enabled best practices in AEC and takeaways for Finnish shipbuilding industry. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manage. 9(3) (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramaji, I.J., Memari, A.M.: Product architecture model for multistory modular buildings. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142(10) (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bouguessa, A., Forgues, D., Doré, S.: La complémentarité entre le Building Information Modeling [BIM] et le Product LifeCycle Management [PLM] en passant par le Lean Construction [LC]. In: GSCE 2013 General Conference, Montreal, Canada (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nöldgen, M., Harder, J., Wassmann, W.: Closing the GAP in BIM – an engineering approach. In: IABSE Symposium Report, IABSE Conference Geneva 2015: Structural Engineering: Providing Solutions to Global Challenges. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Geneva (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reefman, R.J.B., Van Nederveen, G.A.: Knowledge management in an integrated design and engineering environment. In: eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction: ECPPM 2012. CRC Press, Reykjavik (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shin, H.M., Lee, H.M., Oh, S.J., Chen, J.H.: Analysis and design of reinforced concrete bridge column based on BIM. In: The Twelfth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction. Elsevier Ltd., Hong Kong (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Foufou, S., Fenves, S.J., Bock, C., Rachuri, S., Sriram, R.D.: A core product model for PLM with an illustrative XLM implementation. In: International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahn, S., Park, M., Lee, H., Yang, Y.: Object oriented modelling of construction operations for schedule-cost integrated planning, based on BIM. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Nottingham (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ibrahim, M., Krawczyk, R.: The level of knowledge of CAD objects within the building information model. In: Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture 2003 Conference, pp. 172–177 (2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eigner, M., Fehrenz, A.: Managing the product configuration throughout the lifecycle. In: PLM11-8th International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eastman, C.M.: Building Product Models: Computer Environments, Supporting Design and Construction. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1999)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gielingh, W.: General AEC reference model [GARM]. ISO TC184/SC4 (1988)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vartiainen, P.: On the principles of comparative evaluation 8(3), 359–371 (2002)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Boton, C., Rivest, L., Forgues, D., Jupp, J.: Comparing PLM and BIM from the product structure standpoint. In: Harik, R., Rivest, L., Bernard, A., Eynard, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2016. IAICT, vol. 492, pp. 443–453. Springer, Cham (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Den Otter, A., Pels, H.J., Iliescu, I.: BIM versus PLM: Risks and benefits (2011)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kubler, S., Buda, A., Robert, J., Främling, K., Le Traon, Y.: Building lifecycle management system for enhanced closed loop collaboration. In: Harik, R., Rivest, L., Bernard, A., Eynard, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2016. IAICT, vol. 492, pp. 423–432. Springer, Cham (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Latiffi, A.A., Brahim, J., Fathi, M.S.: The development of building information modeling (BIM) definition. Appl. Mech. Mater. 567, 625–630 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanna Mangialardi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carla Di Biccari
    • 1
  • Claudio Pascarelli
    • 1
  • Mariangela Lazoi
    • 1
  • Angelo Corallo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering for InnovationUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations