Skip to main content

Ordered Novel  Weighted Averages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Type-2 Fuzzy Logic and Systems

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 362))

Abstract

The novel weighted averages (NWAs) are extensions of the linear arithmetic weighted average and are powerful tools in aggregating diverse inputs including numbers, intervals, type-1 fuzzy sets (T1 FSs), words modeled by interval type-2 fuzzy sets, or a mixture of them. In contrast to the linear arithmetic weighted average, the ordered weighed average (OWA) is a nonlinear operator that can implement more flexible mappings, and hence it has been widely used in decision-making. In many situations, however, providing crisp numbers for either the sub-criteria or the weights is problematic (there could be uncertainties about them), and it is more meaningful to provide intervals, T1 FSs, words, or a mixture of all of these, for the sub-criteria and weights. Ordered NWAs are introduced in this chapter. They are also compared with NWAs and Zhou et al’s fuzzy extensions of the OWA. Examples show that generally the three aggregation operators give different results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J.M. Mendel, D. Wu, Computing with words for hierarchical and distributed decision making, in Computational Intelligence in Complex Decision Systems, D. Ruan, Ed. (Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.M. Mendel, D. Wu, Perceptual Computing: Aiding People in Making Subjective Judgments (Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken, NJ, 2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Wu, Intelligent systems for decision support, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California, (Los Angeles, CA, May 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Wu, J.M. Mendel, Aggregation using the linguistic weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15(6), 1145–1161 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Wu, J.M. Mendel, Corrections to aggregation using the linguistic weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16(6), 1664–1666 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Wu, J.M. Mendel, Computing with words for hierarchical decision making applied to evaluating a weapon system. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 18(3), 441–460 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Wu, J.M. Mendel, Social judgment advisor: an application of the perceptual computer, in Proceedings of IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, (Barcelona, Spain, July 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Filev, R. Yager, On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 94, 157–169 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. X. Liu, The solution equivalence of minimax disparity and minimum variance problems for OWA operators. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 45, 68–81 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Majlender, OWA operators with maximal Renya entropy. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 155, 340–360 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, Modeling Decisions: Information Fusion and Aggregation Operators (Springer, Berlin, 2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Yager, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 18, 183–190 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Yager, J. Kacprzyk, The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications (Kluwer, Norwell, MA, 1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. S.-M. Zhou, F. Chiclana, R. I. John, and J. M. Garibaldi, A practical approach to type-1 OWA operation for soft decision making, in Proceedings of 8th International FLINS Conference on Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control, (Madrid, Spain, 2008) pp. 507–512

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.-M. Zhou, F. Chiclana, R.I. John, J.M. Garibaldi, Type-1 OWA operators for aggregating uncertain information with uncertain weights induced by type-2 linguistic quantifiers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159(24), 3281–3296 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. S.-M. Zhou, F. Chiclana, R.I. John, J.M. Garibaldi, Type-2 OWA operators–aggregating type-2 fuzzy sets in soft decision making, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (Hong Kong, June, 2008), pp. 625–630

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Dubois, H. Prade, A review of fuzzy sets aggregation connectives. Informat. Sci. 36, 85–121 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. N.N. Karnik, J.M. Mendel, Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set. Informat. Sci. 132, 195–220 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. J.M. Mendel, Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Wu, J.M. Mendel, Enhanced Karnik-Mendel Algorithms for interval type-2 fuzzy sets and systems, in Proc (CA, June, NAFIPS, San Diego, 2007), pp. 184–189

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Wu, J.M. Mendel, Enhanced Karnik-Mendel algorithms. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17(4), 923–934 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W.M. Dong, F.S. Wong, Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension priniple. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 21, 183–199 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Y.-Y. Guh, C.-C. Hon, E.S. Lee, Fuzzy weighted average: the linear programming approach via Charnes and Cooper’s rule. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 117, 157–160 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Y.-Y. Guh, C.-C. Hon, K.-M. Wang, E.S. Lee, Fuzzy weighted average: a max-min paired elimination method. J. Comput. Math. Appl. 32, 115–123 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. D.H. Lee, M.H. Kim, Database summarization using fuzzy ISA hierarchies. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. B 27, 68–78 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T.-S. Liou, M.-J.J. Wang, Fuzzy weighted average: an improved algorithm. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 49, 307–315 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Liu, J.M. Mendel, Aggregation using the fuzzy weighted average, as computed using the Karnik-Mendel Algorithms. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 12(1), 1–12 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. G.J. Klir, B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Yager, Ranking fuzzy subsets over the unit interval, in Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 17, 1978, pp. 1435–1437

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Wu, J.M. Mendel, A comparative study of ranking methods, similarity measures and uncertainty measures for interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Informat. Sci. 179(8), 1169–1192 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. G. Bordogna, M. Fedrizzi, G. Pasi, A linguistic modelling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operator. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 27, 126–132 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. F. Herrera, A sequential selection process in group decision making with linguistic assessment. Informat. Sci. 85, 223–239 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Herrera, J. Verdegay, Linguistic assessments in group decision, in Proceedings of 1st European Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies, Aachen, pp. 941–948 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. Herrera, L. Martinez, A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8(6), 746–752 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Z. Xu, Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. Informat. Sci. 168, 171–184 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. D. Ben-Arieh, Z. Chen, Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision making using group recommendations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A 36(3), 558–568 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R.I. John, S.-M. Zhou, J.M. Garibaldi, F. Chiclana, Automated group decision support systems under uncertainty: trends and future research. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Res. 4(4), 357–371 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. L.A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-1. Informat. Sci. 8, 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. J.M. Mendel, R.I. John, F. Liu, Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14(6), 808–821 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. F. Liu, J.M. Mendel, Encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets using an interval approach. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16(6), 1503–1521 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. X. Wang, E.E. Kerre, Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (I). Fuzzy Sets Syst. 118, 375–387 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. X. Wang, E.E. Kerre, Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (II). Fuzzy Sets Syst. 118, 387–405 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. X. Wang, A comparative study of the ranking methods for fuzzy quantities, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Gent, (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  44. X. Wang, E.E. Kerre, On the classification and the dependencies of the ordering methods, in Fuzzy Logic Foundations and Industrial Applications, ed. by D. Ruan (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrech, 1996), pp. 73–88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. R. Jain, Decision making in the presence of fuzzy variables. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 6, 698–703 (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. R. Jain, A procedure for multiple-aspect decision making using fuzzy set. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 8, 1–7 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. S. Chen, Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17, 113–129 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. J. Kim, Y. Moon, B.P. Zeigler, Designing fuzzy net controllers using genetic algorithms. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 15(3), 66–72 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. J. Adamo, Fuzzy decision trees. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 4, 207–219 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. R. Yager, On choosing between fuzzy subsets. Kybernetes 9, 151–154 (1980)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. R. Yager, A procedure for ordering fuzzy sets of the unit interval. Informat. Sci. 24, 143–161 (1981)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. P. Fortemps, M. Roubens, Ranking and defuzzification methods based on area compensation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 82, 319–330 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. K. Nakamura, Preference relations on a set of fuzzy utilities as a basis for decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(2), 147–162 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. W. Kolodziejczyk, Orlovsky’s concept of decision-making with fuzzy preference relation–further results. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 19(1), 11–20 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. J. Saade, H. Schwarzlander, Ordering fuzzy sets over the real line: an approach based on decision making under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 50(3), 237–246 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongrui Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ranking Methods for T1 FSs

Ranking Methods for T1 FSs

Wang and Kerre [41,42,43,44] performed a very comprehensive study on ranking methods for T1 FSs. They partitioned over 35 ranking methods for T1 FSs into three classes:

  1. 1.

    Class 1: Reference set(s) is (are) set up, and each T1 FS is mapped into a crisp number based on the reference(s). The T1 FSs are then ranked according to the corresponding crisp numbers.

  2. 2.

    Class 2: A function \(f(A_i)\) is used to map a T1 FS \(A_i\) to a crisp number, which can then be ranked. No reference set(s) is (are) used in the mapping.

  3. 3.

    Class 3: T1 FSs \(A_i\) (\(i=1,\ldots ,M\)) are ranked through pairwise comparisons.

They then proposed seven reasonable properties that a ranking method should satisfy [41]. Some simple ranking methods, which are also the most reasonable ones according to the seven properties [41, 42], are summarized in Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wu, D., Huang, J. (2018). Ordered Novel  Weighted Averages. In: John, R., Hagras, H., Castillo, O. (eds) Type-2 Fuzzy Logic and Systems. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 362. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72892-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72892-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72891-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72892-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics