This chapter explores the connections between the circular economy and the reduction of embodied carbon. Circular economic approaches focus on maintaining the value of materials for as long as possible. A circular economy seeks to keep materials in circulation, removing the concept of waste from the system and the need for material extraction from primary sources. In a completely circular economy, all ‘waste’ outputs would equal system inputs. If the built environment is thought about in this way, as a system, then the inputs are construction materials, and these materials accumulate in buildings, which can also be thought of as the stock. Demolition waste is the output flow of materials in this system. This concept can also be extended to embodied carbon. Construction materials are input flows of embodied carbon. These emissions are new to the system. The adoption of circular economic design approaches that facilitate longer building lifetimes, greater component and material reuse can reduce the input flow of embodied emissions and ensure already expended embodied carbon remains in stock. This chapter commences with a review of the key literature on the circular economy in construction in general terms and provides an overview of four related design strategies: building reuse, material reuse, design for deconstruction and design for adaptability. A series of ‘good practice’ case studies illustrate the respective strategies across a range of structural types. Each case study is used to provide practical insights on project processes, drivers, enabling conditions and the perceived benefits and challenges of adopting circular economic approaches. These insights are drawn from semi-structured interviews with members of each design team, supplemented by supporting literature. The chapter concludes by drawing out common lessons of how circular economic approaches can contribute to the delivery of a low carbon built environment.
- Embodied carbon
- Circular economy
- Material reuse
- Case studies
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Addis, W., & Schouten, J. (2004). Design for deconstruction. Principles of design to facilitate reuse and recycling. London: CIRIA.
Andrews, C. J., Hattis, D., Listokin, D., Senick, J. A., Sherman, G. B., & Souder, J. (2017). Energy-efficient reuse of existing commercial buildings. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1134275.
Arup. (2016). The circular economy in the built environment. Available at: http://publications.arup.com/publications/c/circular_economy_in_the_built_environment. Accessed 27/04/17.
Assefa, G., & Ambler, C. (2017). To demolish or not to demolish: Life cycle consideration of repurposing buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 28, 146–153.
Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they are built. New York: Viking Penguin.
Buxton, P. (2015). St John Bosco Arts College, Liverpool – Article in RIBA journal. Available at: http://www.steelconstruction.info/St_John_Bosco_Arts_College,_Liverpool. Accessed 02/05/17.
Canada Green Building Council. (2010). Material reuse at the Ottawa Convention Centre. Green Space, Ottawa Region Chapter Newsletter, Materials Issue, 8, April 2010. Available at: http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/322919/7289577/1276203149047/CaGBC_ORC_Green_Space_Issue_8_short.pdf?token=QXNNcA5t2gT9HuhpYnr2uM4wOJ8%3D. Accessed 12/07/17.
CE100. (2016). Circularity in the built environment: Case studies. A compilation of case studies from the CE100. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/Built-Env-Co.Project.pdf. Accessed 27/04/17.
Chau, C. K., Xu, J. M., Leung, T. M., & Ng, W. Y. (2015). Evaluation of the impacts of end-of-life management strategies for deconstruction of a high-rise concrete framed office building. Applied Energy, 185, 1595–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.019.
Cheshire, D. (2016). Building revolutions: Applying the circular economy to the built environment. London: RIBA Publishing. ISBN: 9781859466452.
Datta, M. (2012). M&S Cheshire Oaks store. Available at: http://corporate.marksandspencer.com/blog/stories/mands-cheshire-oaks-store. Accessed 02/05/17.
De Wolf, C., Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice. Energy and Buildings, 140, 68–80. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778817302815.
Densley Tingley, D. (2013). Design for deconstruction: An appraisal (Doctoral dissertation). University of Sheffield.
Densley Tingley, D., & Allwood, J. M. (2015). The rise of design for deconstruction – A cradle to cradle approach for the built environment. In: International Sustainable Development Research Society conference, the tipping point: Vulnerability and adaptive capacity, 10th–12th July 2015, Geelong, Australia.
Densley Tingley, D., & Davison, B. (2011). Design for deconstruction and material reuse. Proceedings of the ICE – Energy, 164(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1680/ener.2011.164.4.195.
Densley Tingley, D., & Davison, B. (2012). Developing an LCA methodology to account for the environmental benefits of design for de-construction. Building and Environment, 57, 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.005.
Densley Tingley, D., Cooper, S., & Cullen, J. M. (2017). Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 642–652.
Enviromate. (2017). Available at: https://www.enviromate.co.uk/. Accessed 14/07/17.
Faithful + Gould. (2013). Marks & Spencer Cheshire Oaks building performance evaluation first year performance summary. Available from: http://www.greencoreconstruction.co.uk/downloads/MS_Cheshire_Oaks_Building_Performance_Evaluation_-_Summary_-_Technical_a_.pdf
Giesekam, J., Barrett, J., & Taylor, P. (2016). Construction sector views on low carbon building materials. Building Research & Information, 44(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1086872.
Guy, B., & Ciarimboli, N. (n.d.). Seattle guide: Design for disassembly in the built environment. Available at: http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/greenbuilding/documents/Design_for_Disassembly-guide.pdf. Accessed 02/05/2017.
Hammond, G., & Jones, C. (2011). Inventory of carbon and energy, Version 2.0. Available at: http://www.circularecology.com/embodied-energy-and-carbon-footprint-database.html#.WWc7GojyuUk. Accessed 13/07/17.
Hill, C. A. S., & Dibdiakova, J. (2016). The environmental impact of wood compared to other building materials. International Wood Products Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2016.1190166.
Horner, R. (2014). Our first community room – Marks and Spencers blog. Available at: http://corporate.marksandspencer.com/blog/stories/our-first-community-room. Accessed 02/05/17.
Hosseini, M. R., Rameezdeen, R., Chileshe, N., & Lehmann, S. (2015). Reverse logistics in the construction industry. Waste Management Research, 33(6), 499–514.
Laefer, D. F., & Manke, J. P. (2008). Building Reuse Assessment for Sustainable Urban Reconstruction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(217).
Langston, C., Wong, F. K. W., Hui, E. C. M., & Shen, L.-Y. (2008). Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 43(10), 1709–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2007.10.017.
Luscuere, L. M. (2017). Materials Passports: Optimising value recovery from materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Waste Resource Management, 170(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00016.
Manewa, A., Pasquire, C., Gibb, A., Ross, A.,& Siriwardena. (2013). Adaptable buildings: Striving towards a sustainable future. People and the planet 2013 conference: Transforming the future, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, 2–4 July. Available at: http://global-cities.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Adaptable-Buildings-Striving-Towards-a-Sustainable-Future1.pdf. Accessed 27/04/17.
Morgan, C., & Stevenson, F. (2005) Design and detailing for deconstruction. Available at: http://www.seda.uk.net/index.php?id=136. Accessed 02/05/17.
Philips. (2017). Light as a service – UK student movement is a beacon of sustainability for wider society. Available at: http://www.philips.com/a-w/about/sustainability/sustainable-planet/circular-economy/light-as-a-service.html. Accessed 13/07/17.
Pinder, J. A., Schmidt, R., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A., & Saker, J. (2017). What is meant by adaptability in buildings? Facilities, 35(1/2), 2–20.
Planet Reuse. (2017). Available at: https://planetreuse.com/. Accessed 14/07/17.
Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017a). Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055.
Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017b). Scrutinising embodied car-bon in buildings: The next performance gap made manifest. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.049.
Pongiglione, M., & Calderini, C. (2014). Material savings through structural steel reuse: A case study in Genoa. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 86, 87–92.
Pritchard, O. (2015). St John Bosco Arts College by BDP – Article in the architect’s journal. Available at: http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/buildings/st-john-bosco-arts-college-by-bdp/8679827.article. Accessed 02/05/17.
RICS. (2014). Methodology to calculate embodied carbon, RICS guidance note, Global 1st edition. ISBN: 9781842197950 Available at: http://www.rics.org/Documents/Methodology_embodied_carbon_final.pdf.
Sergio, C., & Gorgolewski, (n.d.). Reuse of structural steel at BedZED (Beddington Zero Energy Development). Available at: http://www.reuse-steel.org/files/projects/bedzed/bedzed%20case%20study%205-5.pdf. Accessed 12/07/17.
The Crown Estate. (2017). Quadrant 3, modern renaissance. Available at: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/5249/urb-quadrant-3-brochure.pdf. Accessed 12/07/17.
Van Odijk, S., & van Bovene, F. (2014). Circular construction: The foundation under a renewed sector. ABN.AMRO. Available at: https://www.slimbreker.nl/downloads/Circle-Economy_Rapport_Circulair-Construction_05_2015.pdf. Accessed 27/04/17.
WRAP. (2012). Marks and Spencers sustainable learning store. Available at: http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Refurbishment%20Resource%20Efficiency%20Case%20Study_Retail_M&S.pdf. Accessed 02/05/17.
The authors would like to sincerely thank all those who gave their time up for interviews. The contribution of the second author was supported by the Research Council UK Energy Programme through the Centre for Industrial Energy, Materials and Products (grant number EP/N022645/1). The third author was supported by an EPSRC PhD studentship, grant reference EP/L504920/1.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Densley Tingley, D., Giesekam, J., Cooper-Searle, S. (2018). Applying Circular Economic Principles to Reduce Embodied Carbon. In: Pomponi, F., De Wolf, C., Moncaster, A. (eds) Embodied Carbon in Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72796-7_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72795-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72796-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)