Advertisement

Chronotopes of Migration Scholarship: Challenges of Contemporaneity and Historical Conjuncture

  • Ayşe Çağlar
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter argues that temporal regimes of migration and migrants are rather neglected in migration scholarship, and even if they are scrutinized, the focus is usually on the different ways migrants experience time and/or the disjunctive temporalities shaping their agency. The temporality of value regimes that shape the location and the value of migration and migrants in a particular space and time are hardly addressed. This chapter focuses first on the temporal frameworks of migration scholarship (particularly of integration and post-migrant approaches) as chronotopes to scrutinize their culturalizing and ethnicizing logics in analyzing, migrant practices and emplacement in areas of settlement. It argues that these perspectives are of limited analytical value as they deny migrants and non-migrants contemporaneity. The chapter suggests an alternative perspective that brings migrants and non-migrants into a common analytical lens, and it approaches the study of migrancy and migrants’ cultural production in relation to the revaluation processes of capital accumulation and urban restructuring taking place at a particular conjuncture in time. Relatedly, the chapter situates the strategic success of the post-migrant intervention and of cultural producers within the broader dynamics of city-making and wealth generation in Vienna at a particular historical conjuncture.

References

  1. Akbaba, Ülkü, Ljubomir Bratic, Sarah Galehr, Andreas Görg, and Gabrielle Pfeiffer. 2009. Kunst, Kultur Und Theater Für Alle! [Art, Culture and Theater for All!]. http://www.iodo.at/kulturstudie090606.pdf.
  2. Amelia, Anna, Devrimsel D. Nergiz, Thomas Faist, and Nina Glick Schiller, eds. 2012. Beyond Methodological Nationalism Research Methodologies for Cross-Border Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, Ruben. 2014. Time and the Migrant Other: European Border Controls and the Temporal Economics of Illegality. American Anthropologist 116 (4): 795–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. Form of Time and Chronotope in the Novel. In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Mikhael Holquist, 84–258. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baubock, Rainer. 1998. Sharing History and Future? Time Horizons of Democratic Membership in an Age of Migration. Constellations 4 (3): 320–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazinger, von Irene. 2012. “Gespräch mit Shermin Langhoff Wozu postmigrantisches Theater?.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Feuilleton. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/buehne-und-konzert/gespraech-mit-shermin-langhoffwozu-postmigrantisches-theater-11605050.html. Accessed 9 September 2014.
  8. Bloch, Ernst. 1977 [1932]. Nonsynchronism and the Obligation to Its Dialectics. New German Critique 11: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bratic, L. 2011. Die Wahrheit der Kulturpolitik. Kulturrisse 2. http://kulturrisse.at/ausgaben/urbane-raeume-zwischen=verhandlung=und=verwandlung/kulturpolitiken/die-wahrheit-der-kulturpolitik. Accessed September 9, 2013.
  10. Butler, J. 2009. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Çağlar, Ayşe. 2006. Hometown Associations, the Rescaling of State Spatiality and Migrant Grassroots Transnationalism. Global Networks 6 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2013. Locating Migrant Hometown Ties in Time and Space. Locality as a Blind Spot of Migration Scholarship. Historische Anthropologie 21 (1): 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2014. Nations Unbound and Beyond: The Global Perspective and the Spatio-Temporal Frameworks. Workshop presented at the Perspectives on Nation Unbound: The Transnational Migration Paradigm in the Current Conjuncture, Amsterdam, October 27.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2016. “Still ‘migrants’ after all those years: foundational mobilities, temporal frames and emplacement of migrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (6): 952–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2018. “Minorities, War and Historical Conjuncture: A Multiscalar Approach to City Making in a Disempowered City:” in A. Gingrich ed. Anthropology in Transition Austrian RAI Series, Sean Kingston Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Çağlar, A., and N. Glick Schiller. 2011. Introduction: Migrants and Cities. In Locating Migration: Rescaling Cities and Migrants, ed. Nina Glick Schiller and Ayşe Çağlar, 1–22. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2015. A Multiscalar Perspective on Cities and Migration. Sociologica Italian Journal of Sociology 2: 1–9.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2018. Migrants and City Making. Multiscalar Perspectives on Dispossession. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Chari, Sharad, and Katherine Verdery. 2009. Thinking Between the Posts: Postcolonialism, Postsocialism, and Ethnography After the Cold War. Comparative Studies in Society and History 51 (1): 6–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. City of Vienna. 2012. Monitoring Integration Diversity Reports Vienna 2009–2011. https://www.wien.gv.at/menschen/integration/grundlagen/monitoring/index.html.
  21. ———. 2017. Facts and Figures – Vianese Population According to Migration Background. https://www.wien.gv.at/english/social/integration/basic-work/facts-figures.html. Accessed October 26, 2017.
  22. Clarke, J. 2014. Conjunctures, Crises, and Cultures: Valuing Stuart Hall. Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 70: 113–122.Google Scholar
  23. Cwerner, Saulo B. 2001. The Times of Migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 27 (1): 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elchardus, Mark, I. Glorieux, and M. Scheys. 1987. Temps, Culture et Coexistence. Studi Emigrazione 24 (86): 138–154.Google Scholar
  25. Espahangizi, Von Kijan. 2016. Das #Postmigrantische Ist Kein Kind Der Akademie. http://geschichtedergegenwart.ch/das-postmigrantische-kein-kind-der-akademie/.
  26. Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Favell, Adrian. 1998. The Europeanisation of Immigration Politics. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 2 (10). http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1998-010a.htm.
  28. Foroutan, Naika, Canan Coskun, Schwarze Benjamin, Beigang Steffen, Arnold Sina, and Kalkum Dorina. 2014. Hamburg postmigrantisch: Einstellungen der Hamburger Bevölkerung zu Musliminnen und Muslimen. Berlin: Berliner Institut für empirische Integrations- und Migrations- forschung. Online. www.bim.hu-berlin.de/media/BIM_Hamburg%20postmigrantisch%202014.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2017.
  29. Franquesa, Jaume. 2016. “Dignity and indignation: bridging morality and political economy in contemporary Spain.” Dialectical Anthropology 40(2): 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glick Schiller, Nina, and Andreas Wimmer. 2003. Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology. International Migration Review 37 (3): 576–610.Google Scholar
  31. Glick Schiller, Nina, and Ayşe Çağlar. 2009. Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality in Migration Studies: Migrant Incorporation and City Scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35 (2): 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2013. Locating Migrant Pathways of Economic Emplacement: Thinking Beyond the Ethnic Lens. Ethnicities 13 (4): 494–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. 2015. Displacement, Emplacement and Migrant Newcomers: Rethinking Urban Sociabilities Within Multiscalar Power. Identities 23 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  34. Glick Schiller, Nina, Ayşe Çağlar, and Thaddeus C. Guldbrandsen. 2006. Beyond the Ethnic Lens: Locality, Globality, and Born-Again Incorporation. American Ethnologist 33 (4): 612–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffiths, Melanie, Ali Rogers, and Bridget Anderson. 2013. Migration, Time and Temporalities: Review and Prospect. Oxford: COMPAS Research Resources Paper.Google Scholar
  36. Hadj-Abdou, Leila. 2014. Immigrant Integration and the Economic Competetivenes Agenda: A Comparison of Dublin and Vienna. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (12): 1875–1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hammar, Tomas. 1994. Legal Time of Residence and the Status of Immigrants. In From Aliens to Citizens: Redefining the Status of Immigrants in Europe, ed. Rainer Bauboeck, 187–197. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  38. Hart, K. 2001. Money in an Unequal World. Anthropological Theory 1 (3): 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harvey, D. 2004. The ‘New’ Imperialism: Accumulation Through Dispossession. Socialist Register 40: 63–87.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2006. Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  41. Ibanez-Tirado, Diana. 2017. ‘We Sit and Wait’: Migration, Mobility and Temporality in Guliston, Southern Tajikistan. Current Sociology. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/70080/1/accepted%20version%20we%20sit%20and%20wait%20sep%202017.pdf.
  42. Kalb, D. 2011. Introduction. In Headlines of Nation, Subtexts of Class: Working-Class Populism and the Return of the Repressed in Neoliberal Europe, ed. D. Kalb and G. Halmai, 1–36. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  43. Kalb, D., and H. Tak. 2005. Introduction: Critical Junctions—Recapturing Anthropology and History. In Critical Junctions: Anthropology and History Beyond the Cultural Turn, ed. D. Kalb and H. Tak, 1–28. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  44. Langhoff, Shermin. 2011. Die Herkunft spielt keine Rolle – ‘Postmigrantisches’ Theater im Ballhaus Naunynstraße: Interview mit Shermin Langhoff. Bundeszentrale fuer politische Bildung. http://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/bildung/kulturelle-bildung/60135/interview-mit-shermin-langhoff?p=all. Accessed March 12, 2015.
  45. Lomnitz, Claudia. 2012. Time and Dependency in Latin America Today. South Atlantic Quarterly 111 (2): 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Malmberg, Gunnar. 1997. Time and Space in International Migration. In International Migration, Immobility, and Development: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. Tomas Hammar, Grete Brochmann, Kristof Tamas, and Thomas Faist, 21–49. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  47. Massey, Doreen. 1992. Politics and Space/Time. New Left Review I (196): 65–84.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Massey, D. 2012. Power-Geometry and a Progressive Sense of Place. In Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, ed. J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, and L. Tickner, 60–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. McDearman, B., G. Clark, and J. Parilla. 2013. The 10 Traits of Globally Fluent Metro Areas. Global Cities Initiative. A Joint Project of Brookings and J. P. Morgan Chase. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Multimedia/Interactives/2013/tentraits/Vienna.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2014.
  51. Mecheril, Paul. 2014. Was Ist Das X Im Postmigrantischen? Sub/Urban 2 (3): 107–112.Google Scholar
  52. Miraftab, Faranak. 2014. Displacement: Framing the Global Relationally. In Framing the Global: Entry Points for the Search, ed. Hilary Kahn, 37–50. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Narotzky, Susana. 2017. Making Difference: Concluding Comments on Work and Livelihoods. In Work and Livelihoods – History, Ethnography and Models in Times of Crisis, ed. Susana Narotzky and Victoria Goddard, 205–217. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Narotzky, S., and G. Smith. 2006. Immediate Struggles: People, Power and Place in Rural Spain. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Translated by A. Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Pine, Frances. 2014. Migration as Hope: Space, Time, and Imagining the Future. Current Anthropology 44 (Supplement 9): 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Quijano, A. 2000. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology 15 (2): 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ramsay, Georgina. 2017. Incommensurable Futures and Displaced Lives: Sovereignty as Control Over Time. Public Culture 29 (3): 515–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schinkel, Willem. 2017. Imagined Societies: A Critique of Immigrant Integration in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sievers, Wiebke. 2014. A Contested Terrain: Immigrants and Their Descendants in Viennese Culture. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 21 (1): 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Simmel, Georg. 1949. The Sociology of Sociability. American Journal of Sociology 55 (3): 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, Neil. 2002. New Globalism, New Urbanism. Antipode 34 (3): 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tsianos, Vassilis, and Jıliane Karakayali. 2014. Rassismus Und Repräsentationspolitik in Der Postmigrantischen Gesellschaft. ApuZ 64 (13–14): 33–39.Google Scholar
  64. URBACT. 2011. Zoom on Vienna. URBACT. http://urbact.eu/fr/results/zoom-on/?zoomid=10.
  65. Wahl, Christine. 2013. “Theaterpionierin Langhoff: Ich habe mich selbst gelabelt.” Der Spiegel Online. http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/gesellschaft/shermin-langhoff-uebernimmt-maxim-gorki-theater-in-berlin-a-933453.html. Accessed 5 October 2014.
  66. Westin, Charles. 1998. Temporal and Spatial Aspects of Multiculturality: Reflections on the Meaning of Time and Space in Relation to the Blurred Boundaries of Multicultural Societies. In Lurred Boundaries: Migration, Ethnicity, Citizenship, ed. Rainer Bauboeck and John Rundell, 53–84. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishers.Google Scholar
  67. Yıldız, Erol. 2010. Die Öffnung Der Orte Zur Welt Und Postmigrantische Lebensentwürfe. SWS Rundschau 3: 318–339.Google Scholar
  68. Yıldız, Erol, and Marc Hill. 2014. Nach der Migration Postmigrantische Perspektiven jenseits der Parallelgesellschaft. Bielefeld: Transkript Verlag.Google Scholar
  69. Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1987. The Language of Time: Towards a Semiotics of Temporality. The Sociological Quarterly 28 (3): 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayşe Çağlar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social and Cultural AnthropologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations