Advertisement

The Legal Framework of Research in Indigenous Contexts

  • Arnold Groh
Chapter

Abstract

The first historical account of a legal debate about the status of indigenous peoples dates back to the sixteenth century, when Bartolomé de Las Casas argued in favour of human rights to be granted to the indigenous peoples in the new Spanish colonies of the Americas. But it took very long until special consideration was given to indigenous peoples on the level of international law. From the 1950s, the International Labour Organization adopted specific conventions focussing on indigenous peoples’ rights. And from 1982, another UN body was concerned with preparing what was then adopted by the General Assembly in 2007 as the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Its observance is of major importance for anyone contacting indigenous peoples or working on any issue related to these cultural groups. Although the definition of indigeneity is a very difficult matter, researchers should ensure that they never violate any rights. In this chapter, we go into the details of the Declaration’s articles that are particularly relevant for field research in indigenous contexts. Foremost, indigenous peoples are granted their right to self-determination. States are under obligation to protect indigenous peoples, their cultures and environments. Indigenous peoples have the right to revitalise their culture, they have cultural autonomy in education and lifestyle, and they have land rights. In media and education, indigenous culture has to be reflected correctly. Researchers have to make sure that they never obstruct the indigenous peoples’ exercise of these rights but rather counterbalance existing impediments.

Keywords

History of indigenous rights United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Role of researchers Culturally sustainable field research 

References

  1. Aguiar, W., & Halseth, R. (2015). Aboriginal peoples and historic trauma: The processes of intergenerational transmission. Prince George, BC: National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health.Google Scholar
  2. Barelli, M. (2015). The United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples: A human rights framework for intellectual property rights. In M. Rimmer (Ed.), Indigenous intellectual property: A handbook of contemporary research (pp. 47–63). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Bombay, A., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2009). Intergenerational trauma: Convergence of multiple processes among first nations peoples in Canada. Journal de la santé autochtone/Journal of Aboriginal Health, 5, 6–47.Google Scholar
  4. Brush, S. B. (1993). Indigenous knowledge of biological resources and intellectual property rights: The role of anthropology. American Anthropologist, 95(3), 653–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gervais, D. J. (Ed.). (2015). International intellectual property: A handbook of contemporary research. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Gibbons, A. (1992). Rain forest diet: You are what you eat. Science, 225, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Groh, A. (2009). Culture, trauma and psychotherapy. In S. Madu (Ed.), Trauma and psychotherapy in Africa. Proceedings of the 5 th African conference on psychotherapy (pp. 32–42). Limpopo: University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Herzog, R. (1988). Staaten der Frühzeit. Ursprünge und Herrschaftsformen. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  11. Indigenous Bar Association. (2011). Understanding and implementing the UN declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. An introductory handbook. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, Faculty of Law.Google Scholar
  12. International Labour Organization. (1955). Convention 104, concerning the abolition of penal sanctions for breaches of contract of employment by indigenous workers (Entry into force: 7 June 1958). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  13. International Labour Organization. (1957). Convention 107, concerning the protection and integration of indigenous and other tribal and semi-tribal populations in independent countries (Entry into force: 2 June 1959). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  14. International Labour Organization. (1989). Convention 169 – Indigenous and tribal peoples in independent countries (Entry into force: 5 Sept 1991). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  15. Mazzola, R. (2016). Copyright and Tjuringa: Can aboriginal dreaming be owned? Draft paper of the presentation held at the Seventh Multidisciplinary Meeting on Indigenous Peoples (EMPI VII), Milan, 12–13 May 2016.Google Scholar
  16. Mazzola, R. (2017). Alienating the Inalienable: Copyright and Madayin. Paper presented at the international seminar Coloquio internacional de estudiantes de doctorado Italia–Mexico, UNAM (Mexico City), 19 June 2017.Google Scholar
  17. Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth–Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rimmer, M. (Ed.). (2015). Indigenous intellectual property: A handbook of contemporary research. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Senft, G. (2016). “Masawa–begeokwa si tuta!”: Cultural and cognitive implications of the Trobriand Islanders’ gradual loss of their knowledge of how to make a Masawa Canoe. In P. Meusburger, T. Freytag, & L. Suarsana (Eds.), Ethnic and cultural dimensions of knowledge (pp. 229–256). Cham/Heidelberg/New York/Dodrecht/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Simon, B. S. (2005). Intellectual property and traditional knowledge: A psychological approach to conflicting claims of creativity in international law. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 20, 4(Art. 5), 1613–1684. Available at: <http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/btlj/vol20/iss4/5> (accessed 26 July 2017). https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38F69H.
  21. Smuda, M. (Ed.). (1986). Landschaft. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
  22. Tisucká, B. (2014). The intertwinedness of forest and cultural landscapes in the context of cultural ecology. Envigogika: Charles University E-journal for Environmental Education, 9, 1. Published 30. 5. 2014. Available at: <https://envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/428/566> (accessed 28 July 2017). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.428.
  23. United Nations. (1981–1983). Study of the problem of discrimination against indigenous populations: Final report submitted by the Special Rapporteur, Mr. José Martínez Cobo. E/CN.4/Sub.2/476 (1981); E/CN.4/Sub.2/1982/2 (1982); E/CN.4/Sub.2/1983/21 (1983). Geneva/New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  24. United Nations. (1996). Working paper by the Chairperson–Rapporteur, Mrs. Erica–Irene A. Daes. On the concept ofindigenous people”. E/CN.4/Sub.2/AC.4/1996/2. Geneva: UN.Google Scholar
  25. United Nations. (2000). Human rights of indigenous peoples. Report of the seminar on the draft principles and guidelines for the protection of the heritage of indigenous people. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/26. Geneva: UN.Google Scholar
  26. United Nations Conference on Freedom of Information. (1948). Held at Geneva 23 March – 21 April 1948. Final act. Lake Success, New York: UN.Google Scholar
  27. United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Resolution 217 (III): International Bill of Human Rights/Charte internationale des droits de l’homme. Part A: Universal Declaration of Human Rights/Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme; Part B: Right of Petition/Droit de pétition; Part C: Fate of Minorities/Sort des minorités; Part D: Publicity to be Given to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights/Publicité a donner à la déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme; Part E: Preparation of a Draft Covenant on Human Rights and Draft Measures of Implementation/Preparation d’un projet de pacte relatif aux droits de l’homme et des mesures de mise en œvre. Paris: Nations Unies.Google Scholar
  28. United Nations General Assembly. (1976a). International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  29. United Nations General Assembly. (1976b). International covenant on civil and political rights. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  30. United Nations General Assembly. (2007). Declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. Resolution adopted [without reference to a Main Committee (A/61/L.67 and Add.1)] 61/295. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  31. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interctional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  32. Weeber, K.–. W. (1990). Smog über Attika. Umweltverhalten im Altertum. Zürich: Artemis & Winkler.Google Scholar
  33. Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N. P., Bierer, L. M., Bader, H. N., Klengel, T., Holsboer, F., & Binder, E. B. (2015). Holocaust exposure induced intergenerational effects on FKBP5 methylation. Biological Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.005.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnold Groh
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations