Advertisement

What Is Indigenous Philosophy and What Are Its Implications for Education

Chapter
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Whether there is an Indigenous philosophy is an issue that intrigues writers as much as the possibility of there being an indigenous research method. There are, of course, local variations on any purported Indigenous philosophy, and these are important to retain, for without them there would be no wider notion of ‘Indigenous philosophy’. When using the term ‘Indigenous philosophy’, it is therefore important to note that indigenous groups are constructed by the term ‘indigenous’; that the term ‘philosophy’ is equally as influential and needs to be thought about carefully before it is introduced into indigenous conceptual frameworks; and that there is a holistic metaphysics that needs to be honoured when these terms are being evaluated. But Indigenous philosophy is indeed a useful nomenclature on its own for a set of perceptions of things in the world that are distinctive from that of the dominant West, and for scholars to institute the normality of holistic perceptions and epistemologies. With indigenous peoples continually asserting their rights to their own holistic perception of the world – a real right such as that of speaking one’s own language or residing on traditional lands – the ethical nature of education arises as a concern for indigenous groups. In this chapter, the authors argue that an Indigenous set of propositions about education must be based on knowledge of colonisation, as well as on the ability to suggest a more positive range of assertions about the potential for Indigenous education when it is based upon a foundation of holism. Two senses of Indigenous philosophy (of education) are explored in the chapter.

Keywords

Indigenous philosophy Indigenous education Holistic metaphysics Decolonisation Ethics 

References

  1. Adorno, T. (2001). Metaphysics: Concept and problems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aikenhead, G., & Michell, H. (2011). Bridging cultures: Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing nature. Toronto: Pearson Education Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Arola, A. (2011). Native American philosophy. In W. Edelglass & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of world philosophy (pp. 562–573). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bajracharya, H., & Brouwer, W. (1997). A narrative approach to science teaching in Nepal. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.) In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination (pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Battiste, M. (1986). Micmac literacy and cognitive assimilation. In J. Barman, Y. Hébert, & D. McCaskill (Eds.), Indian education in Canada: The legacy (Vol. 1, pp. 23–44). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  8. Battiste, M., & Henderson, J. (2000). Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: A global challenge. Saskatoon: Purich Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bodunrin, P. (1984). The question of African philosophy. In R. Wright (Ed.), African philosophy: An introduction (pp. 161–179). New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  11. Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe: Clear Light Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Calderon, D. (2008). Indigenous metaphysics: Challenging Western knowledge organization in social studies curriculum. Doctoral dissertation, The University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  13. Callicott, L. B. (1997). Earth’s insights: A multicultural survey of ecological ethics from the Mediterranean Basin to the Australian outback. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cassirer, E. (1953). The philosophy of symbolic forms (R. Manheim, Trans., Vol. 1). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Corntassel, J. (2003). Who is indigenous? ‘Peoplehood’ and ethnonationalist approaches to rearticulating indigenous identity. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 9(1), 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deloria, V., Jr. (2001). Power and place equal personality. In V. Deloria Jr. & D. Wildcat (Eds.), Power and place: Indian education in America (pp. 21–28). Golden: Fulcrum Resources.Google Scholar
  18. Durie, M. (1994). Whaiora: Māori health development. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ermine, W. (1995). Aboriginal epistemology. In M. Battiste & J. Barman (Eds.), First nations education in Canada: The circle unfolds (pp. 101–112). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ermine, W., Sinclair, R., & Jeffery, B. (2004). The ethics of research involving indigenous peoples: Report of the Indigenous Peoples’ Health Research Centre to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. Regina.Google Scholar
  21. Fuchs, W. (1976). Phenomenology and the metaphysics of presence: An essay in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garfield, J., & Norden, B. (2016). If philosophy won’t diversify, let’s call it what it really is. The New York Times. Retrieved from nytimes.com
  23. Gratton, P. (2003). What’s in a name? African philosophy in the making. Philosophia Africana, 6(2), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inglis, S. (2002). Speaker’s experience: A study of Mi’kmaq modality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
  25. Inglis, S. (2004). 400 years of linguistic contact between the Mi’kmaq and the English and the interchange of the two world views. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, XXIV(2), 389–402.Google Scholar
  26. Jegede, O., & Aikenhead, G. (1999). Transcending cultural borders: Implications for science teaching. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kincheloe, J. (2011). Critical ontology and indigenous ways of being. In K. Hayes, S. Steinberg, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Key works in critical pedagogy (pp. 333–349). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laenui, P. (2000). A loving epistemology: What I hold critical in my life, faith, and profession. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(6), 683–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Le Grange, L. (2009). Are there distinctive indigenous methods of inquiry? Indilinga, 8(2), 189–198.Google Scholar
  30. Le Grange, L. (2015). Indigenous students’ learning of school science: A philosophical interpretation. In P. Smeyers, D. Bridges, N. Burbules, & M. Griffiths (Eds.), International handbook of interpretation in educational research methods (pp. 1037–1055). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Le Grange, L., & Aikenhead, G. (2017). Rethinking the ‘western tradition’: A response to Enslin and Horsthemke. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(1), 31–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1167656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahmoudi, S., Jafari, E., Nasrabadi, H., & Liaghatdar, M. (2012). Holistic education: An approach for 21 century. International Education Studies, 5(2), 178–186.Google Scholar
  33. Marsden, M. (1985). God, man and universe: A Maori view. In M. King (Ed.), Te Ao Hurihuri: The world moves on: Aspects of Maoritanga (pp. 143–164). Auckland: Longman Paul Ltd..Google Scholar
  34. Mika, C. (2015). The thing’s revelation: Māori philosophical research. Waikato Journal of Education, 20(2), 3–4.Google Scholar
  35. Mika, C., & Tiakiwai, S. (2016). Tawhiao’s unstated heteroglossia: Conversations with Bakhtin. Educational Philosophy and Theory.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1135409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murove, M. (2009). An African environmental ethic based on concepts of ukama and Ubuntu. In M. Murove (Ed.), African ethics: An anthology of comparative and applied ethics (pp. 315–331). Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal.Google Scholar
  37. Oruka, H. (1990). Sage philosophy. New York: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  38. Pere, R. (1982). Ako: Concepts and learning in the Māori tradition. Hamilton: University of Waikato.Google Scholar
  39. Pihama, L. (2001). Tihei mauriora, Honouring our voices, Manawahine as a Kaupapa Māori theoretical framework (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  40. Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies from the south: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, L. (2005). On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 85–107). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Thrupp, M., & Mika, C. (2012). The politiics of teacher development for an indigenous people. In C. Day (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of teacher and school development (pp. 204–213). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Turnbull, D. (1997). Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions. Futures, 29(6), 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations