Skip to main content

An Attractor/Repellor Approach to Autonomous Sailboat Navigation

Abstract

This paper proposes an alternative navigation method which avoids the use of traditional waypoints and cross-track error, by utilising an array of waypoint attractors and repellors of different strengths and polarities. A range of possible headings either side of the bearing to the waypoint are considered, and the velocity-made good on each heading is computed. The heading with the optimal VMG is chosen. Attractors are waypoints which have a positive effect on the route (like traditional waypoints) and repellors are waypoints which have a negative or repelling effect on the heading.

Keywords

  • Cross-track Error
  • Apparent Wind Angle
  • Current Waypoint
  • Winding Angle
  • Robotic Sailboat

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72739-4_6
  • Chapter length: 11 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-72739-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. 1.

    Autohelm is a trademark of Raymarine.

References

  1. AŁstrom, K. J., Hagglund, T. 1995. PID controllers: theory, design, and tuning. S.l.: International Society of Automation.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alves, J., Ramos, T., Cruz, N. 2008. A reconfigurable computing system for an autonomous sailboat. Journal of the Osterreichische Gesellschaft fur Artificial Intelligence, pp. 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alvira, M., Barton, T. 2012. Small and inexpensive single-board computer for autonomous sailboat control. Robotic sailing, pp. 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowditch, J.I. 2002. American practical navigator. S.l.: Defense Mapping Agency Hydrographic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Briere, Y. 2006. The first microtransat challenge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brooks, R. 1986. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. Robotics and automation, pp. 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burns, R. S. 1995. The use of artificial neural networks for the intelligent optimal control of surface ships. Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donkin, R. 2010. The future of work. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson, G. 2008. Sailing fundamentals. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Langbein, J., Fruhwirth, T. 2011. A rule-based approach to long-term routing for autonomous sailboats. Robotic sailing, pp. 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Microtransat, n.d. The Microtransat Challenge. http://www.microtransat.org. Accessed 2017.

  12. Minorsky, N. 1922. Directional stability of automatic steered bodies. Journal of American Society of Naval Engineers, 280–309.

    Google Scholar 

  13. NavSim Technology, n.d. Definitions. http://www.navsim.com/products/help/definitions.html. Accessed May 2017.

  14. Raymarine, n.d. Raymarine Autopilot Systems. http://www.raymarine.com/display/?id=581. Accessed May 2017.

  15. Rousmaniere, J., and M. Smith. 1999. The annapolis book of seamanship. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sauze, C., Neal, M. 2008. Design considerations for sailing robots performing long term autonomous oceanography. In Proceedings of the International Robotic Sailing Conference, pp. 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stelzer, R., Jafarmadar, K. 2007. A layered system architecture to control an autonomous sailboat. Towards autonomous robotic systems.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stelzer, R., Jafarmadar, K. 2011. History and recent developments in robotic sailing. Robotic sailing, pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stelzer, R., Proll, T., John, R. I. 2007. Fuzzy logic control system for autonomous sailboats. In FUZZ-IEEE, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. United Kingdom Hydrographic Office, n.d. Admiralty Tidal Stream Atlases. https://www.admiralty.co.uk/publications/miscellaneous-tidal-publications/admiralty-tidal-stream-atlases. Accessed May 2017.

  21. WRSC, n.d. World Robotic Sailing Championship. http://www.roboticsailing.org/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dermot Tynan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tynan, D. (2018). An Attractor/Repellor Approach to Autonomous Sailboat Navigation. In: Øvergård, K. (eds) Robotic Sailing 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72739-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72739-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72738-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72739-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)