Abstract
When regulating private maritime security companies arose as a pressing issue in 2012, a number of key actors made a conceptual choice that turned out to be a mistake. The discussion centered on whether private maritime security companies (PMSCs) were primarily a subset of the security industry or the maritime industry. At the time, PMSCs’ principal activity was to provide armed guards on ships transiting the High Risk Area off Somalia. Since they were then considered necessary supernumeraries to the crews of commercial vessels, representatives of the shipowners won the argument that PMSCs should be treated as part of the broader maritime industry. The main regulatory initiatives, therefore, were divorced from existing private security accountability initiatives and were developed in such a way as to suit the needs of commercial vessels in transit. This approach, however, has proved shortsighted. Even after the first successful attacks in 5 years, armed transits off Somalia are a fraction of what they used to be in terms of both frequency and financial value. But the PMSCs that have survived this bust period have sought and found work performing other services in the maritime space. Unfortunately, however, those activities are generally not covered by the regulatory initiatives that were produced under the erroneous notion that private maritime security companies are more maritime service providers than security service providers. The consequence, therefore, is that the private maritime security industry, as it currently operates, is largely unregulated.
To understand the nature of this accountability gap, it is necessary to review (1) the private security regulatory initiatives that were rejected when addressing PMSCs, (2) what has been done to regulate PMSCs specifically, and (3) what PMSCs are now doing. Only then can this analysis really delve into why current measures do not adequately cover the private maritime security industry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Apuzzo (2014a).
- 3.
Apuzzo (2014b).
- 4.
Wiese Bockmann and Katz (2012).
- 5.
BBC News (2012).
- 6.
Mitra (2016).
- 7.
BBC News (2013).
- 8.
Maritime Executive (2017).
- 9.
Seatrade Maritime News (2013).
- 10.
Percy (2007).
- 11.
Mlinarcik (2006).
- 12.
Chesterman (2011).
- 13.
Participating States of the Montreux Document (2017): inter alia Afghanistan, Angola, Australia, Austria, Canada, China, France, Germany, Iraq, Poland, Russia, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, the United Kingdom and the United States (see:, International Committee of the Red Cross).
- 14.
Ralby (2016).
- 15.
Overview of the Montreux Document (2017).
- 16.
Overview of the Montreux Document (2017).
- 17.
Montreux Document (2008).
- 18.
Montreux Document (2008), Preface ¶ 5.
- 19.
Participating States of the Montreux Document (2017).
- 20.
Wilton Park (2009).
- 21.
ICoC (2010).
- 22.
United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (2011).
- 23.
IPOA, BAPSC, PASA (2009).
- 24.
ICoC (2010), ¶ 13.
- 25.
ICoC (2010), Definitions.
- 26.
The author was involved in the drafting and can speak to the mindset of the drafters at the time; this is not speculation or inference.
- 27.
ICoC (2010), ¶ 7.
- 28.
Ralby (2011).
- 29.
Articles of Association of the International Code of Conduct Association (2013).
- 30.
International Code of Conduct Association, Certification Procedures (2016).
- 31.
Siegel (2011).
- 32.
Ralby (2015a).
- 33.
Website of the International Maritime Organization, About IMO, July (2014). http://www.imo.org/About/Pages/Default.aspx. Accessed 7 Jul 2017.
- 34.
IMO Private Armed Security (2017).
- 35.
Best Management Practices (2011), 8.15.
- 36.
IMO Private Armed Security (2017).
- 37.
IMO Interim Guidance to Private Maritime Security Companies (2012).
- 38.
IMO Private Armed Security (2017).
- 39.
DeWinter-Schmitt (2014). (“Two key issues neglected in the ISO/PAS 28007 are the responsibility of maritime security companies to respect human rights and to carry out human rights due diligence processes. There is also no mention of conducting human rights risk analyses or engaging with affected communities and stakeholders during that process. In fact, there is no mention that maritime security operations can potentially impact on human rights. Furthermore, there are no stipulations for human rights trainings for personnel, and the requirements for grievance mechanisms are inadequate. While there is a provision that no one under 18 should be employed to carry weapons, there is no reference to avoiding the worst forms of child labor or other gross human rights violations. The ISO/PAS 28007 is simply not a human rights standard.”).
- 40.
DeWinter-Schmitt (2015). (“While these [human rights] additions warrant recognition, there is still room for strengthening the human rights provisions of the IS0 28007-1 if it is to truly reflect the [UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights].”).
- 41.
DeWinter-Schmitt (2015).
- 42.
Ralby (2015b).
- 43.
Drew and McLoghlin (2016).
- 44.
Quartz (2016).
- 45.
Bennett (2015).
- 46.
Splash 24/7 (2016).
- 47.
Information gleaned from interviews in country, plus company’s promotional material.
- 48.
Kinsey et al. (2009).
- 49.
- 50.
The Hidden Paw (2009).
- 51.
Information gleaned from interviews in the region.
- 52.
Sengupta (2008).
- 53.
Data taken from interviews with private maritime security companies regarding their interaction with floating armories.
- 54.
Black (2013).
- 55.
Anandan (2013).
- 56.
Subramani (2014).
- 57.
Quoted in Id.
- 58.
Selvaraj (2016).
References
Anandan S (2013) ‘Floating Armoury’ poses a legal conundrum, The Hindu, 16 October 2013. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/floating-armoury-poses-a-legal-conundrum/article5237673.ece. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Apuzzo M (2014a) Blackwater guards found guilty in 2007 Iraq Killings, New York Times, 22 October 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/23/us/blackwater-verdict.html?_r=0. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Apuzzo M (2014b) Ex-Blackwater guards given long terms for killing Iraqi Civilians, New York Times, 13 April 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/14/us/ex-blackwater-guards-sentenced-to-prison-in-2007-killings-of-iraqi-civilians.html?_r=0. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Articles of Association of the International Code of Conduct Association (2013) http://www.icoca.ch/en/articles_of_association. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
BBC News (20 February 2012) Indian Police detain Italian Navy Security Guards. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-17093224. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
BBC News (18 October 2013) MV Seaman Guard Ohio: India police arrest crew of US Ship. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asiaindia-24577190. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Bennett T (2015) Maritime security at a crossroads, The Maritime Executive, 26 April 2015. http://www.maritimeexecutive.com/features/maritime-security-at-a-crossroads. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Best Management Practices (2011) IMO MSC.1/Circ.1339 (2011), BMP4: best management practices for protection against Somalia based piracy
Black N (2013) Criminal jurisdiction over maritime security in the Indian Ocean. Cornell Int Law J Online 1:77
Chesterman S (2011) Lawyers, guns and money: the governance of business activities in conflict zones. Chicago J Int Law 11:321, 334
DeWinter-Schmitt R (2014) Why the ISO Standard for maritime security – ISO/PAS 28007 – is not a security and human rights standard, human analytics, 23 October 2014. http://human-analytics.net/iso-standard-maritime-security-isopas-28007-security-human-rights-standard/. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
DeWinter-Schmitt R (2015) New ISO standard on private maritime security companies reflects some progress on human rights, 20 May 2015. http://human-analytics.net/new-iso-standard-private-maritime-security-companies-reflects-progress-human-rights/. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Drew P, Robert McLoughlin R (2016) Handbook on the use of force by private security companies, oceans beyond piracy. http://oceansbeyondpiracy.org/publications/use-force-handbook-private-security-companies. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Houreld K (2011) Puntland (Somali Region) defies Federal Government over Saracen Deal. Associated Press, (28 January 2011). http://laaska.wordpress.com/2011/01/28/puntland-somali-region-defies-fed-govt-over-saracen-deal/. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
ICoC (2010) The International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers (2010). http://icoc-psp.org/. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
IMO Interim Guidance to Private Maritime Security Companies (2012) MSC.1/Circ.1443 – Interim guidance to private maritime security companies providing PCASP on board ships in the high risk area. http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/security/secdocs/documents/piracy/msc.1-circ.1443.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
IMO Private Armed Security (2017) http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Security/PiracyArmedRobbery/Pages/Private-Armed-Security.aspx. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
International Code of Conduct Association, Certification Procedures (2016) http://www.icoca.ch/en/certification. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
IPOA, BAPSC & PASA (6 June 2009) Industry statement. http://www.humanrights.ch/home/upload/pdf/090617_Nyon_Declaration.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Kinsey C, Hansen S, Franklin G (2009) The impact of private security companies on Somalia’s governance network. Camb Rev Int Aff 22(1):152–154
Maritime Executive (27 November 2017) Seaman Guard Ohio Crew Acquitted. https://maritime-executive.com/editorials/seamanguard-ohio-crew-acquitted. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Mazzetti M, Schmitt E (20 January 2011) Blackwater founder said to Back Mercenaries, Washington Post. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/world/africa/21intel.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Mitra D (2016) India, Italy Spar over Marines issue again as Ad-hoc tribunal reviews Enrica Lexie case, The Wire, 30 March 2016. http://thewire.in/26752/india-italy-spar-over-marines-issue-again-as-ad-hoc-tribunal-reviews-enrica-lexie-case/. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Mlinarcik JT (2006) Private military contractors & justice: a look at the industry, blackwater & the Fallujah incident. Regent J Int Law 4:129
Montreux Document (2008) The Montreux Document on pertinent international legal obligations and good practices for states related to operations of private military and security companies during armed conflict, U.N. doc. A/63/467-S/2008/636, at Preface 2 (2008). http://www.eda.admin.ch/psc. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Overview of the Montreux Document (2017) The Montreux Document, Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/home/foreign-policy/international-law/international-humanitarian-law/private-military-securitycompanies/montreux-document.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Participating States of the Montreux Document (2017) International Committee of the Red Cross. http://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/home/topics/intla/humlaw/pse/parsta.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Percy S (2007) Morality and regulation. In: Chesterman S, Lehnardt C (eds) From mercenaries to market: the rise and regulation of private military companies
Quartz (18 April 2016) Piracy on the high seas is in decline, and so is the anti-piracy industry. http://qz.com/664036/piracy-on-thehigh-seas-is-on-the-decline-and-so-is-the-anti-piracy-industry/. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Ralby I (2011) Maritime security and the ICoC. J Int Peace Oper 7(3), https://issuu.com/ipoa/docs/journal_v7_n3/14. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Ralby I (2015a) Accountability for armed contractors, Fletcher Secur Rev, 12 January 2015. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/c28a64_8622580aa7754ec4adbb1bc9d9541d2a.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Ralby I (2015b) Private military companies and the Ius ad Bellum. In: The Oxford handbook of the use of force in international law. Oxford University Press. Chapter 53
Ralby I (2016) The Montreux Document: the legal significance of non-legal instrument (Chapter 10). In: Private military and security contractors: controlling the corporate warrior. Rowman & Littlefield
Scahill J (2007) Blackwater: the rise of the world’s most powerful mercenary army. Nation Books, New York
Seatrade Maritime News (2013) At last, An accepted international standard for maritime security. http://www.seatrademaritime.com/news/europe/at-last-an-accepted-global-standard-for-maritime-security.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Selvaraj A (2016) US anti-piracy vessel seaman guard ohio crew members sentenced to jail in Tamil Nadu, Times of India, 11 January 2016. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/US-anti-piracy-vessel-MV-Seaman-Guard-Ohio-crew-members-sentenced-to-jail-in-TamilNadu/articleshow/50530239.cms. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Sengupta K (2008) Blackwater gun boats will protect ships, The Independent, 19 November 2008. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/blackwater-gunboats-will-protect-ships-1024582.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Siegel M (2011) ASIS webinar, 15 April 2011
Splash 24/7 (19 April 2016) SAMI goes into liquidation after membership halves. http://splash247.com/sami-goes-into-liquidationafter-membership-halves/. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Subramani A (2014) Madras High Court quashes criminal case against Crew of US Ship, Times of India, 10 July 2014. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Madras-high-court-quashes-criminal-case-against-crew-of-US-ship/articleshow/38147206.cms. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
The Hidden Paw (11 May 2009) Somali pirates directed by British consultants. http://szamko.wordpress.com/2009/05/11/somalipirates-directed-by-british-consultants/. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Thurnher JS (2008) Drowning in blackwater: how weak accountability over private security contractors significantly undermines counterinsurgency efforts. 2008-JUL Army Law 64
United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (2011) http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Website of the International Maritime Organization, About IMO July 2014. http://www.imo.org/About/Pages/Default.aspx. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Wiese Bockmann M, Katz A (2012) Shooting to kill pirates risks blackwater moment. Bloomberg, 8 May 2012. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-05-08/shooting-to-kill-pirates-risks-blackwater-moment. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Wilton Park (6 June 2009) Private military and security companies: working toward an international code of conduct. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. http://www.business-humanrights.org/Links/Repository/818115/link_page_view. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ralby, I.M. (2018). What Went Wrong When Regulating Private Maritime Security Companies. In: Schildknecht, J., Dickey, R., Fink, M., Ferris, L. (eds) Operational Law in International Straits and Current Maritime Security Challenges. Operational Maritime Law, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72718-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72718-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72717-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72718-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)