The Child, the Pupil, the Citizen: Outlines and Perspectives of a Critical Theory of Citizenship Education

  • Federico Farini
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)

Abstract

In 2014 the English National Curricula for primary and secondary schools was heavily criticised for failing to value pupils’ understanding of concepts such as rights, responsibilities and the changing nature of democracy. In 2015 the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) framework confirmed a teacher-centred approach, launching the idea of education in British values. In the EYFS, values such as cooperation, freedom, responsibility are presented as social skills to be learnt. Through a critical review of the curricula, this contribution challenges the pedagogical model where citizenship is to be transmitted from the adult to the child unidirectionally, in a form where citizens are manufactured. The case for an educational recognition of citizenship as a practice embedded in the day-to-day reality of children as citizens in the present is advanced.

References

  1. Angers, J., & Machtmes, K. L. (2005). An ethnographic-case study of beliefs, context factors, and practices of teachers integrating technology. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 771–794. Available at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol10/iss4/8. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
  2. Association for Citizenship Teaching. (2016). Citizenship national curriculum, guidance for schools. Available at: https://www.teachingcitizenship.org.uk/about-citizenship/citizenship-national-curriculum-2014-guidance. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  3. Atkinson, P. A., & Coffey, A. (2004). Analysing documentary realities. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 56–75). London: Sage.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n25.Google Scholar
  4. Baraldi, C. (2014). Children’s participation in communication systems: A theoretical perspective to shape research. Soul of Society: A Focus on the Lives of Children and Youth, 18(18), 63–92.  https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-466120140000018014.Google Scholar
  5. Baraldi, C. (2015). Promotion of migrant Children’s epistemic status and authority in early school life. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(1), 5–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-014-0116-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baraldi, C., & Corsi, G. (2016). Niklas Luhmann. Education as a social system. London: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49975-8_3.Google Scholar
  7. Batho, G. (1990). The history of the teaching of civics and citizenship in English schools. Curriculum Journal, 1(1), 91–100.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517900010110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biesta, G., & Lawy, R. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: Overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 63–79.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-512-3_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bingham, S., & Whitebread, D. (2012). School readiness. A critical review of perspectives and evidence. London: TACTYC.Google Scholar
  10. Bjerke, H. (2011). It’s the way to do it. Expressions of agency in child-adult relations at home and school. Children & Society, 25(2), 93–103.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00266.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blacker, D. (2000). The institutional autonomy of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(2), 229–246.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Board of Education. (1923). Report on the teaching of history. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  13. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.  https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. British Association for Early Childhood. (2015). Fundamental British values in the EYFS. Available at: http://www.foundationyears.org.uk/files/2015/03/Fundamental_British_Values.pdf. Last accessed on 24 June 2017.
  15. Burton, D., & May, S. (2015). Citizenship education in secondary schools in England. Educationalfutures, 1(7). Available at: http://educationstudies.org.uk/?p=3690. Last accessed 27 August 2017.
  16. Cockburn, T. (2013). Rethinking children’s citizenship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crick, B. (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools. Final report of the Advisory Group on Citizenship. London: Qualification and Curriculum Authority. Available at: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/4385/1/crickreport1998.pdf. Last accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  19. Crick, B. (2000). The citizenship order for schools’. In N. Pearce & J. Hallogarten (Eds.), Tomorrow’s citizens. Critical debates in citizenship and education (pp. 77–83). London: Institute for Public Policy Research.  https://doi.org/10.1093/parlij/55.3.488.Google Scholar
  20. Department for Education. (2011). The framework for the national curriculum. A report by the expert panel for the national curriculum review. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  21. Department for Education. (2014a). The national curriculum in England: Key stages 3 and 4 framework document. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-secondary-curriculum. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
  22. Department for Education. (2014b). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage: Setting the standards for learning, development and care for children from birth to five. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
  23. Department for Education. (2014c). Promoting British values as part of SMSC. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380595/SMSC_Guidance_Maintained_Schools.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
  24. Department for Education. (2015). Inspecting registered early years providers: Guidance for inspectors. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-inspection-handbook-from-september-2015. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
  25. Etzioni, A. (Ed.). (1995). New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  26. Farini, F. (2011). Cultures of education in action: Research on the relationship between interaction and cultural presuppositions regarding education in an international educational setting. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2176–2186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.  https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. France, A. (1998). ‘Why should we care?’: Young people, citizenship and questions of social responsibility. Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), 97–111.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.1998.10592997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. France, A. (2000). Towards a sociological understanding of youth and their risk-taking. Journal of Youth Studies, 3(3), 317–331.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713684380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grant, C. A. (2011). In A. Portera (Ed.), Intercultural and multicultural education. Enhancing global interconnectedness. London/New York: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203848586.Google Scholar
  31. Hall, T., & Williamson, H. (1999). Citizenship and community. Leicester: Youth Work Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203139943. Google Scholar
  33. Hebdige, D. (1988). Hiding in the light: On images and things. New York: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Herrlitz, W. (2005). In R. Maier (Ed.), Dialogue in and around multicultural schools. Tubingen: Niemeyer.  https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110933215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hodgson, N. (2008). Citizenship education, policy, and the educationalization of educational research. Educational Theory, 58(4), 417–434.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00297.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Home Office. (2011). Prevent strategy review. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97976/prevent-strategy-review.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2017.
  38. James, A. (2009). Agency. In J. Qvortrup, G. Valentine, W. Corsaro, & M. S. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 34–45). Basingstoke: Palgrave.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-27468-6.Google Scholar
  39. James, A., & James, A. (2008). Childhood studies. In A. James & A. James (Eds.), Key concepts in childhood studies. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526435613.n9
  40. Jerome, L. (2016). Interpreting Children’s Rights Education (CRE): Three perspectives and three roles for teachers. Citizenship, Social and Economic Education, 15(2), 143–156.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173416683425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jerome, L., & Clemitshaw, G. (2012). Teaching (about) Britishness? An investigation into trainee teachers’ understanding of Britishness in relation to citizenship and the discourse of civic nationalism. The Curriculum Journal, 23(1), 19–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.650468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kymlicka, W. (2008). Education for citizenship. In J. Arthur & I. Davies (Eds.), Citizenship education (pp. 128–150). London: Sage.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200486.Google Scholar
  43. Kymlicka, W., & Norman, W. (1994). Return of the citizen: A survey of recent work on citizenship theory. Ethics, 104(2), 352–381.  https://doi.org/10.1086/293605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Labuschagne, A. (2003). Qualitative research. Airy fairy or fundamental? The Qualitative Report, 8(1), 100–103. Available at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol8/iss1/7. Accessed 23 June 2017.
  45. Larkin, C. (2001). Citizenship education or crowd control? The Crick Report and the role of peace education and conflict resolution in the new citizenship curriculum (Working paper). University of Bradford. Available at: http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/confres/assets/ccr9.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
  46. Lawton, D., Cairns, J., & Gardner, R. (2005). Education for citizenship. London: Continuum.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197911432594.Google Scholar
  47. Lawy, R., & Biesta, G. (2006). Citizenship-as-practice: The educational implications of an inclusive and relational understanding of citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 34–50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00335.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lloyd, E. (2015). Early childhood education and care policy in England under the Coalition Government. London Review of Education, 13(2), 144–156.  https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.13.2.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  50. Madeley, H. M. (1920). History as a school of citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Mattheis, C. (2012). The system theory of Niklas Luhmann and the constitutionalization of the world society. Goettingen Journal of International Law, 4(2), 625–647.  https://doi.org/10.3249/1868-1581-4-2-mattheis.Google Scholar
  53. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meleady, C. (2015). The EYFS paves the way for British values. Nursery World. Available at: http://www.nurseryworld.co.uk/nursery-world/opinion/1147445/eyfs-paves-british-values. Accessed 23 June 2017.
  55. Miller, D. (2000). Citizenship: What does it mean and why is it important? In N. Pearce & J. Hallgarten (Eds.), Tomorrow’s citizens. Critical debates in citizenship and education (pp. 26–35). London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  56. Ministry of Education. (1938). Secondary education with special reference to grammar schools and technical high schools (The Spens report). London: HM Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
  57. Ministry of Education. (1943). Educational reconstruction (The Norwood report). London: HM Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  58. Ministry of Education. (1949). Citizens growing up: At home, in school and after. London: HM Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  59. Moss, P. (2009). There are alternatives! Markets and democratic experimentalism in early childhood education and care. The Hague: Bernard Van Leer Foundation. Available at: http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/5608/1/There_are_alternatives_Markets_and_democratic_experimentalism_in_early_childhood_education_and_care.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2017.
  60. O’Connor, D., & Angus, J. (2013). Give them time – An analysis of school readiness in Ireland’s early education system. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.723726.
  61. O’Sullivan, F. W. (2014). Citizenship education: An Investigation of Crick’s model and citizenship coordinators’ perceptions of the subject’s purpose. Worcester: The University of Worcester. Available at: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/2130/1/O%27Sullivan_William%20Fergus_PhD%202015.pdf. Accessed 01 Sept 2017.
  62. Office for Standard in Education. (2014). Are you ready? Good practices in school readiness. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/418819/Are_you_ready_Good_practice_in_school_readiness.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
  63. Olssen, M. (2004). From the Crick Report to the Parekh Report: Multiculturalism, cultural difference, and democracy – the re-visioning of citizenship education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(2), 179–192.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000205127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Osler, A. (2000). The Crick Report: Difference, equality and racial justice. Curriculum Journal, 11(1), 25–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/095851700361375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Osler, A. (2011). Teacher interpretations of citizenship education: National identity, cosmopolitan ideals, and political realities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.503245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Osler, O., & Starkey, H. (2006). Education for democratic citizenship: A review of research, policy and practice during 1995–2005. Research Papers in Education, 21(4), 433–466.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520600942438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. PACEY (Professional Association for Childcare and Early Years). (2015). Better inspections for all. Available at: https://www.pacey.org.uk/Pacey/media/ImportedFiles/pdf/Better%20inspection%20for%20all%20-%20PACEY%20consultation%20response%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2017.
  68. Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe: Free Press.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315824307.Google Scholar
  69. Percy-Smith, B. (2010). Councils, consultation and community: Rethinking the spaces for children and young people’s participation. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 107–122.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733281003691368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pykett, J. (2007). Making citizens governable? The Crick Report as governmental technology. Journal of Education Policy, 22(3), 301–319.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930701269202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rapley, T. (2007). Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis. London: Sage.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Scollan, A., & Gallagher, B. (2016). Personal and socio-emotional development and technology. In L. Kaye (Ed.), Young children in a digital age (pp. 113–133). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2008). Understanding the relationship between curriculum, pedagogy and progression in learning in early childhood. Hong Kong Journal of Early Childhood Education, 7(2), 3–13. Available at: http://libdr1.ied.edu.hk/pubdata/img00/arch00/link/archive/1/instarh/2051_image_vol7_no2_p1_68.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2017.
  75. Smith, N., Lister, R., Middleton, S., & Cox, L. (2005). Young people as real citizens: Towards an inclusionary understanding of citizenship. Journal of Youth Studies, 8(4), 425–443.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260500431743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  78. The Guardian. (2014, August 8). Childcare experts dismayed by plans to cut funding for childcare that does not promote ‘British values’. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/aug/08/childcare-funding-british-values-early-years-education. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
  79. Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  80. Tomlinson, S. (2005). Race, ethnicity and education under New Labour. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), 153–171.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000337246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vanderstraeten, R. (2003). Education and society: A plea for a historicized approach. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(2), 195–206.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-8249.2004.00375.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vanderstraeten, R. (2004). The social differentiation of the educational system. Sociology, 38(2), 255–272.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504040863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vanderstraeten, R. (2006). The historical triangulation of education, politics and economy. Sociology, 40(1), 125–142.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506058432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. New York/London: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826.Google Scholar
  85. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federico Farini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of NorthamptonNorthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations