The Right to Be Transnational: Narratives and Positionings of Children with a Migration Background in Italy

  • Sara Amadasi
  • Vittorio Iervese
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)

Abstract

This chapter presents a social system and interactional approach to explore how theorising children in sociology has moved beyond mere interest in children’s ‘voice’ to one where children practise agency and contribute to the structuring of social systems. It examines how children with a migrant background play with narratives of transnational mobility, claiming transnational citizenship. Reflecting on how children’s citizenship and rights relate, and how they are affected by transnational mobility, allows a focus on children’s active participation in social processes. Through positioning theory and interaction analysis, applied to video-recorded extracts of workshops, we aim to explore the resources that children activate in the interaction to deal with their travelling experiences and to construct and negotiate their identities inside the group in an institutional setting.

References

  1. Alston, P. (Ed.). (1994). The best interests of the child: Reconciling culture and human rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amadasi, S. (2014). Beyond belonging. How migrant children actively construct their cultural identities in the interaction. Interdisciplinary Journal of Family Studies, 19(1), 136–152.Google Scholar
  3. Amadasi, S., & Holliday, A. (2017). Block and thread intercultural narratives and positioning: Conversations with newly arrived postgraduate students. Language and Intercultural Communication, 17(3), 254–269.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2016.1276583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayoko, O. B., Härtel, C. E., & Callan, V. J. (2002). Resolving the puzzle of productive and destructive conflict in culturally heterogeneous workgroups: A communication accommodation theory approach. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(2), 165–195.  https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, M. (2006). Translation and conflict. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 335–342.  https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396.  https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baraldi, C., & Iervese, V. (Eds.). (2012). Participation, facilitation, and mediation: Children and young people in their social contexts. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Baraldi, C., & Iervese, V. (2014). Observing children’s capabilities as agency. In D. Stoecklin & J. M. Bonvin (Eds.), Children’s rights and the capability approach. Challenges and prospects (pp. 43–65). Dodrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Barker, C., & Galasiński, D. (2001). Cultural studies and discourse analysis: A dialogue on language and identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Bjerke, H. (2011). It’s the way to do it. Expressions of agency in child-adult relations at home and school. Children & Society, 25, 93–103.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00266.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corsaro, W. A. (2003). Le culture dei bambini. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In H. Rom & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory. Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32–52). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. DeChurch, L., & Marks, M. M. (2001). Maximizing the benefits of task conflict: The role of conflict management. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(1), 4–22.  https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Den Besten, O. (2010). Local belonging and ‘geographies of emotions’: Immigrant children’s experience of their neighbourhoods in Paris and Berlin. Childhood, 17(2), 181–195.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568210365649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deppermann, A. (2013). Editorial: Positioning in narrative interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 23(1).  https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.1.01dep.
  18. Dixon, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Children’s rights and a capability approach: The question of special priority. Cornell Law Review, 97, 549–594. Public Law Working Chapter No. 384.Google Scholar
  19. Eekelaar, J. (1986). The emergence of children’s rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 6, 161–182.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/6.2.161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fail, H., Thompson, J., & Walker, G. (2004). Belonging, identity and Third Culture Kids. Life histories of former international school students. Journal of Research in International Education, 3(3), 319–338.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240904047358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallacher, L. A., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through ‘participatory methods’. Childhood, 15(4), 499–516.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568208091672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Glick-Schiller, N., Basch, L., & Blanc-Szanton, C. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1), 48–63.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3317464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gudykunst, W. (1994). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Harré, R. (1984). Personal being. A theory for individual psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Hatfield, M. (2010). Children moving ‘home’?: Everyday experiences of return migration in highly skilled households. Childhood, 17(2), 243–257.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568210365747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action. Interactions, identities, and institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Hill, M., Davis, J., Prout, A., & Tisdall, K. (2004). Moving the participation agenda forward. Children and Society, 18, 77–96.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoersting, R. C., & Jenkins, S. R. (2011). No place to call home: Cultural homelessness, self-esteem and cross-cultural identities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 17–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutchby, I. (2005). Children’s talk and social competence. Children and Society, 19, 66–73.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. James, A. (2009). Agency. In J. Qvortrup, G. Valentine, W. Corsaro, & M. S. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 34–45). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  36. James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jans, M. (2004). Children as citizens. Towards a contemporary notion of child participation. Childhood, 11(1), 27–44.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568204040182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kjørholt, A. T. (2007). Childhood as a symbolic space: Searching for authentic voices in the era of globalisation. Children’s Geographies, 5(1–2), 29–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280601108148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lemke, J. L. (2008). Identity, development and desire: Critical questions. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & R. Iedema (Eds.), Identity trouble. Critical discourse and contested identities (pp. 17–42). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. MacCormick, N. (1976). Children’s rights: A test-case for theories of rights. Archiv für Rechts und Sozialphilosophie, 62(3), 305–317.Google Scholar
  41. Mannitz, S. (2005). Coming of age as the third generation: Children of immigrants in Berlin. In J. Knörr (Ed.), Childhood and migration: From experience to agency. Bielefeld/Somerset, NJ: Transcript & Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Mnookin, R. H. (1979). Foster care: In whose best interests? In O. O’Neill & W. Ruddick (Eds.), Having children: Philosophical and legal reflections on parenthood (pp. 179–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Moore, A. M., & Barker, G. G. (2012). Confused or multicultural: Third culture individuals’ cultural identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 553–562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parreñas, R. (2001). Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, intergenerational relations in filipino transnational families. Feminist Studies, 27(2), 261–291.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3178765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pollock, D. C., & Van Reken, R. E. (2009). The third culture kid experience growing up among worlds. Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Prout, A., Simmons, R., & Birchall, J. (2006). Reconnecting and extending the research agenda on children’s participation: Mutual incentives and the participation chain. In E. K. M. Tisdall, J. M. Davis, M. Hill, & A. Prout (Eds.), Children, young people and social inclusion (pp. 75–101). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  47. Sacks, H., Shegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn—Taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.  https://doi.org/10.2307/412243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Somers, M., & Gibson, G. D. (1994). Reclaiming the epistemological ‘other’: Narrative and the social constitution of identity. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Social Theory and the Politics of Identity (pp. 37–99). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Tirado, F., & Gálvez, A. (2007). Positioning theory and discourse analysis: Some tools for social interaction analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2).  https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-8.2.248.
  50. Urry, J. (2005). The place of emotions within place. In J. Davidson, L. Bondi, & M. Smith (Eds.), Emotional geographies (pp. 77–86). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  51. Valentine, K. (2011). Accounting for agency. Children & Society, 25, 347–358.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00279.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  53. Vertovec, S. (1999). Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 445–462.  https://doi.org/10.1080/014198799329558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wallace, C. (2011). A school of immigrants: How new arrivals become pupils in a multilingual London school. Language and Intercultural Communication, 11(2), 97–112.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2011.556742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wolff, S. (2004). Ways into the field and their variants. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 195–202). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Amadasi
    • 1
  • Vittorio Iervese
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Studies on Language and CultureUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly

Personalised recommendations