Advertisement

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension

  • Hitoshi Maruyama
  • Naoya Kato
Chapter

Abstract

Portal hypertension is the major and common complication of cirrhosis and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Its severity is determined by the portal pressure or hepatic venous pressure gradients, which are measured invasively using catheterization. Ultrasound (US) is a simple and non-invasive technique available worldwide and is probably the most frequently used imaging tool for liver diseases. With the introduction of microbubble-based materials, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) has become popular for the detailed evaluation of diffuse liver disease and focal hepatic lesions. The recent development of digital technology resulted in the improved visualization of contrast-enhanced appearance with higher resolution, leading to a wider range of applications of CEUS. This chapter describes the concept, benefits, and limitations of CEUS for the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension.

Keywords

Ultrasound Contrast agent Liver Portal hemodynamics Cirrhosis 

References

  1. 1.
    Tsochatzis EA, Bosch J, Burroughs AK. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2014;383:1749–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanyal AJ, Bosch J, Blei A, Arroyo V. Portal hypertension and its complications. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1715–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maruyama H, Sanyal AJ. 14, Portal hypertension: non-surgical and surgical management. In:Schiff’s diseases of the liver. 11th ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 326–60.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thabut D, Moreau R, Lebrec D. Noninvasive assessment of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2011;53:683–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Franchis R. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63:743–52.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baik SK. Haemodynamic evaluation by Doppler ultrasonography in patients with portal hypertension: a review. Liver Int. 2010;30:1403–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lencioni R, Piscaglia F, Bolondi L. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2008;48:848–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maruyama H, Sekimoto T, Yokosuka O. Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid for hepatocellular carcinoma: evidence from a 10-year experience. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:421–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maruyama H, Shiha G, Yokosuka O, et al. Non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension and liver fibrosis using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Hepatol Int. 2016;10:267–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouakaz A, de Jong N. WFUMB safety symposium on Echo-contrast agents: nature and types of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:187–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:187–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Albrecht T, Blomley MJ, Cosgrove DO, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic cirrhosis by transit-time analysis of an ultrasound contrast agent. Lancet. 1999;353:1579–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berzigotti A, Nicolau C, Bellot P, et al. Evaluation of regional hepatic perfusion (RHP) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2011;55:307–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qu EZ, Zhang YC, Li ZY, Liu Y, Wang JR. Contrast-enhanced sonography for quantitative assessment of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33:1971–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhai L, Qiu LY, Zu Y, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantitative assessment of portal pressure in canine liver fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:4509–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim MY, Suk KT, Baik SK, et al. Hepatic vein arrival time as assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is useful for the assessment of portal hypertension in compensated cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2012;56:1053–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jeong WK, Kim TY, Sohn JH, Kim Y, Kim J. Severe portal hypertension in cirrhosis: evaluation of perfusion parameters with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121601.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eisenbrey JR, Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, et al. Chronic liver disease: noninvasive subharmonic aided pressure estimation of hepatic venous pressure gradient. Radiology. 2013;268:581–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shimada T, Maruyama H, Kondo T, Sekimoto T, Takahashi M, Yokosuka O. Impact of splenic circulation: non-invasive microbubble-based assessment of portal hemodynamics. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:812–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Amat-Roldan I, Berzigotti A, Gilabert R, Bosch J. Assessment of hepatic vascular network connectivity with automated graph analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced US to evaluate portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis: a pilot study. Radiology. 2015;277:268–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, et al. Investigating the efficacy of subharmonic aided pressure estimation for portal vein pressures and portal hypertension monitoring. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:1784–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maruyama H, Matsutani S, Okugawa H, et al. Microbubble disappearance-time is the appropriate timing for liver-specific imaging after injection of Levovist. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32:1809–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maruyama H, Ishibashi H, Takahashi M, et al. Effect of signal intensity from the accumulated microbubbles in the liver for differentiation of idiopathic portal hypertension from liver cirrhosis. Radiology. 2009;252:587–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ishibashi H, Maruyama H, Takahashi M, et al. Demonstration of intrahepatic accumulated microbubble on ultrasound represents the grade of hepatic fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1083–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rossi S, Ghittoni G, Ravetta V, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and spiral computed tomography in the detection and characterization of portal vein thrombosis complicating hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1749–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maruyama H, Ishibashi H, Takahashi M, Shimada T, Kamesaki H, Yokosuka O. Prediction of the therapeutic effects of anticoagulation for recent portal vein thrombosis: a novel approach with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37:431–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maruyama H, Takahashi M, Shimada T, Yokosuka O. Emergency anticoagulation treatment for cirrhosis patients with portal vein thrombosis and acute variceal bleeding. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:686–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kiyono S, Maruyama H, Kobayashi K, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastropathy: quantitative analysis of microbubble-induced stomach wall enhancement. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:1792–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sekimoto T, Maruyama H, Kondo T, Shimada T, Kiyono S, Yokosuka O. Potential stagnation in the splanchnic hemodynamics demonstrated by the dynamic microbubble in chronic liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:1001–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Micol C, Marsot J, Boublay N, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a new method for TIPS follow-up. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37:252–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sekimoto T, Maruyama H, Kiyono S, et al. Hepatic filling rate by a microbubble agent: a novel predictor of long-term outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:2082–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maruyama H, Kondo T, Sekimoto T, Yokosuka O. Differential clinical impact of ascites in cirrhosis and idiopathic portal hypertension. Medicine. 2015;94:e1056.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maruyama H, Okugawa H, Kobayashi S, et al. Non-invasive portography: a microbubble-induced three-dimensional sonogram for discriminating idiopathic portal hypertension from cirrhosis. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:587–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Maruyama H, Shimada T, Ishibashi H, Takahashi M, Kamesaki H, Yokosuka O. Delayed periportal enhancement: a characteristic finding on contrast ultrasound in idiopathic portal hypertension. Hepatol Int. 2012;6:511–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations