Advertisement

How to Be a Political Social Change Mathematics Education Activist

  • Peter Appelbaum
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

Three sets of nomadic epistemological categories (Deleuze and Guattari) that coexist with other theoretical frameworks of mathematics education discourse and practice are used to suggest an approach to changing ourselves as mathematics educators through the ways that we think and act. The argument is that these reconceptualizing processes can change our worlds of possibility for mathematics education while allowing coexistence with more mainstream programs of research and practice: Arendt’s work, labor and action; Pitt’s youth leadership, voice and participation; and McElheny’s architectural, scientific, and artistic models. Such epistemological categories establish topologies, reconstructing subjectivities in the process—a tactic of alterglobal social movements that potentially politicize mathematics education: we change ourselves to change the world. Psychoanalytic responses to the terror of change, and the need to address the legacies of mathematics as a component of colonialism, are considered as components of broader social change.

Keywords

Politics of mathematics education Nomadic epistemology Social justice Alterglobal education 

References

  1. Appelbaum, P. (2009a). Against sense & representation: Researchers as undetectives. Educational Insights: Journal of the Centre for Cross-Faculty Inquiry, 13(1). http://www.ccfi.educ.ubc.ca/publication/insights/v13n01/articles/appelbaum/index.html.LastvisitedDecember8,2017
  2. Appelbaum, P. (2009b). Taking action—Mathematics curricular organization for effective teaching and learning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(2), 38–43.Google Scholar
  3. Appelbaum, P. (2012). Mathematical practice as sculpture of utopia: Models, ignorance, and the emancipated spectator. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(2), 14–19.Google Scholar
  4. Appelbaum, P. (2017). Disordered order, ordered disorder: Threads, folds and artistic action. In H. Straehler-Pohl, A. Pais, & N. Bohlman (Eds.), The disorder of mathematics education (pp. 273–290). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Appelbaum, P. (undated). Youth mathematician laureate project. http://yomap.org. Last visited April 30, 2017.
  6. Appelbaum, P., & Gerofsky, S. (2013). Performing alterglobalization in mathematics education: Plenary in the form of a jazz standard. Opening Plenary Address. CIEAEM (International Commission for the Study and Improvement of Mathematics Education). Turin, Italy, July 21–26.Google Scholar
  7. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, S. I. (1973). Sum considerations: Mathematics and humanistic themes. Educational Theory, 23(3), 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (2010). Frames of war: When is life grievable? New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G. (1996). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fox, M. (1993). Radical reflections: Passionate opinions on teaching, learning and living. Washington: Harvest Books.Google Scholar
  14. Kirshner, D. (2002). Untangling teachers’ diverse aspirations for student learning: A crossdisciplinary strategy for relating psychological theory to pedagogical practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(1), 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lundin, S. (2012). Hating school, loving mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1/2), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McElheny, J. (2007). Artists and models. Video of March 2007. Presentation at the Museum of Modern Art, New York. http://www.gvsmedia.com/video-2/w-lFT7CCuT8/JosiahMcElheny-presenting-at-MoMA. Last visited October 2008.
  18. Mellin-Olsen, S. (1987). The politics of mathematics education. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Paraskeva, J. (2016). Curriculum epistemicide: Towards an itinerant curriculum theory. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perry, B., & Dockett, S. (2002). Young children’s access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 81–112). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Phillips, A. (1998). The beast in the nursery: On curiosity and other appetites. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  22. Pitt, A. (2003). The play of the personal: Psychoanalytic narratives of feminist education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  23. Pleyers, G. (2010). Alter-Globalization: Becoming actors in a global age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. Salvio, P. (1999). Reading beyond narratives of cure in curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 15(2), 185–188.Google Scholar
  25. Skovsmose, O. (1994). Toward a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Dordrecht, Holland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sliva Spitzer, J. (2003). Teaching inclusive mathematics to special learners, K-6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  27. Star, S. (1995). Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tarc, P. (2013). International education in global times: Engaging the pedagogic. New York, NY: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Taubman, P. (2012). Disavowed knowledge: Psychoanalysis, education, and teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Todd, S. (1997). Learning desire: Perspectives on pedagogy, culture, and the unsaid. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Tripathi, P. (2008). Developing mathematical understanding through multiple representations. Mathematics in the Middle School, 18(8), 438–445.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arcadia UniversityGlensideUSA

Personalised recommendations