Advertisement

Anatomical Landmarks in Deep Endometriosis Surgery

  • Marcello Ceccaroni
  • Giovanni Roviglione
  • Daniele Mautone
  • Roberto Clarizia
Chapter

Abstract

Deep endometriosis (DE) represents a chronic inflammatory disease, affecting pelvic viscera and peritoneal and retroperitoneal structures and completely distorting their normal aspect and reciprocal relationships by a mechanism of progressive infiltration and retraction. One of the main objectives of its surgical treatment, together with reducing pelvic pain and improving fertility, is the restoration of normal pelvic anatomy. For this reason, surgeons must have a deep knowledge of pelvic anatomy, in order to reassess a grossly distorted surgical field. Thus, pelvic anatomical landmarks represent essential points of reference to start procedures such as mobilization of the pelvic viscera, wide peritoneal resections, or the identification of further anatomical structures to be preserved, such as parasympathetic and orthosympathetic pelvic neural fibers in nerve-sparing procedures.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Minimally-invasive Anatomy Nerve-sparing Deep endometriosis Landmarks Surgery Pelvic spaces Dissection Pelvic innervation Retroperitoneum Laparoscopic eradication 

References

  1. 1.
    Testut L. Traitè d’Anatomie Humaine. 8th ed. Paris: Ed Doin; 1931.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kamina P. Anatomie Clinique. Tome 4. Paris, Ed Maloine SA, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ceccaroni M, Fanfani F, Ercoli A, Scambia G. Innervazione Viscerale e Somatica della Pelvi Femminile. Testo Atlante di Anatomia Chirurgica 2006. Edizioni CIC.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ballester M, Belghiti J, Zilberman S, Thomin A, Bonneau C, Bazot M, Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E. Surgical and clinical impact of extraserosal pelvic fascia removal in segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(6):1041–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Netter FH. Atlante di Anatomia Fisiopatologia e Clinica, Vol. 3. Apparato Riproduttivo, Collezione CIBA, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Kleuver M, Kooijman MA, Kauer JM, et al. Pelvic osteotomies: anatomic pitfalls at the ischium. A cadaver study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117(6–7):376–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Traité d’anatomie humaine. Publié sous la direction de P. Poirier et A. Charpy, 1899.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peham HV, Amreich J. Gynakologische operationslehre. Berlin: S Karger; 1930.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peham HV, Amreich J. Operative gynecology (translated by Ferguson LK). Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1934.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(3):297–303.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Bruni F, D'Urso E, Gagliardi ML, Roviglione G, Minelli L, Ruffo G. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(7):2029–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ceccaroni M, Pontrelli G, Spagnolo E, Scioscia M, Bruni F, Paglia A, Minelli L. Parametrial dissection during laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a new approach aims to improve patients' postoperative quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G, Ruffo G.Neuro-anatomy of the posterior parametrium and surgical considerations for a nerve-sparing approach in radical pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4386–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ercoli A, Delmas V, Fanfani F, et al. Terminologia Anatomica versus unofficial descriptions and nomenclature of the fasciae and ligaments of the female pelvis: a dissection-based comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1565–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heald RJ. The “holy plane” of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med. 1988;81:503–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Havenga YY, Sasaki H, Hatakeyama N, Murakami G. Discrepancies between classic anatomy and modern gynecologic surgery on pelvic connective tissue structure: harmonization of those concepts by collaborative cadaver dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yohannes P. Ureteral endometriosis. J Urol. 2003;170:20–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Antonelli A, Simeone C, Zani D, Sacconi T, Minini G, Canossi E, et al. Clinical aspects and surgical treatment of urinary tract endometriosis: our experience with 31 cases. Eur Urol. 2006;49:1093–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ostrzenski A, Radolinski B, Ostrzenska KM. A review of laparoscopic ureteral injury in pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58:794–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Terzibachian JJ, Gay C, Bertrand V, Bouvard M, Knoepffler F. Value of ureteral catheterization in laparoscopy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2001;29:427–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grainger DA, Soderstrom RM, Schiff SF, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH, Diamond MP. Ureteral injuries at laparoscopy: insights into diagnosis, management and prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:889–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rafique M, Arif MH. Management of iatrogenic ureteric injuries associated with gynecological surgery. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002;34:31–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yabuki Y, Sasaki H, Hatakeyama N, Murakami G. Discrepancies between classic anatomy and modern gynecologic surgery on pelvic connective tissue structure: harmonization of those concepts by collaborative cadaver dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:7–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ceccaroni M, Pontrelli G, Spagnolo E, et al. Nerve-Sparing laparoscopic radical excision of deep endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:14–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G, et al. Deep rectal and parametrial infiltrating endometriosis with monolateral pudendal nerve involvement: case report and laparoscopic nerve-sparing approach. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;153:227–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ercoli A, Delmas V, Gadonneix P, Fanfani F, Villet R, Paparella P, Mancuso S, Scambia G. Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25(3–4):200–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcello Ceccaroni
    • 1
  • Giovanni Roviglione
    • 1
  • Daniele Mautone
    • 1
  • Roberto Clarizia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy“Sacred Heart” HospitalNegrar (Verona)Italy

Personalised recommendations