Advertisement

Single-Port Surgery

  • Kevin J.  E. Stepp
  • Dina A. Bastawros
Chapter

Abstract

Conventional laparoscopy is the preferred approach for many, if not most, major gynecologic procedures that require abdominal access. Conventional laparoscopic instrumentation and access devices as well as robotic-assisted laparoscopic instrumentation are improving rapidly. Whether conventional or robotic laparoscopy is considered, we prefer to minimize the size and number of ports. Many surgical procedures are customarily performed via 3–5 ports through small incisions in the abdominal wall. Each additional port carries a small but not negligible risk for port site complications [1]. These risks include bleeding, infection, injury to nearby organs, soft tissue trauma, herniation, and decreased cosmesis [2, 3].

Keywords

laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery laparoscopy LESS single-site surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Tracy CR, Raman JD, Cadeddu JA, Rane A. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: where have we been and where are we heading? Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5:561–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Escobar PF, Starks DC, Fader AN, et al. Single-port risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with and without hysterectomy: surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2010a;119:43–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Escobar PF, Starks DC, Fader AN, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice surgery in gynecology. Fertil Steril. 2010b;94:2497–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wheeless CR Jr. Elimination of second incision in laparoscopic sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1972;39:134–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA III. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture. N J Med. 1991;88:721–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M. Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(4):762–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stepp KJ. et al. An AAGL Task Force consensus statement: a standardized approach to LESS hysterectomy. American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 43nd Annual Clinical Meeting, Vancouver, BC. November 16–21, 2014.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hong SH, Seo SI, Kim JC, Hwang TK. Cosmetic circumumbilical incision for extraction of specimen after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2006;20(7):519–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang CK, Houng JY, Chiang CJ, et al. Single incision transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a first case report. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1711–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kane S, Stepp KJ. Circumumbilical (Omega) incision for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Oral Presentation: Society Gynecologic Surgeons Annual Clinical Meeting, San Antonio, TX, April 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Angioni S, Pontis A, Pisanu A, et al. Single-port access subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective case-control study. J Minim Invasive. 2015;22:809–12.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uppal S, Frumaovitz M, Escobar P. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: review of literature and available technology. J Minim Invasive. 2011;18:12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, et al. Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(4):450–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sobolewski C, Yeung PP, Hart S. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2011;11:741–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:157–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chern BSM, Lakhotia S, Kho CK, et al. Single incision laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: evolution, current trends, and future perspectives. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2012;1:9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boruta DM. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: an update. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;141:616–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    White W, Goel R, Kaouk J. Single port laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery: initial operative experience and comparative outcomes. Urology. 2009;73:1279–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Song T, Cho J, Kim TJ, Kim IR, et al. Cosmetic outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy compared with multi-port surgery: randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013a;20(4):460–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Song T, Lee Y, Kim ML, et al. Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2013b;75:16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Song T, Kim ML, Jung YW, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013c;209:317.e1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fagotti A, Bottoni C, Vizzielli G, et al. Post operative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(1):255–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoo EH, Shim E. Single-port access compared with three-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery in a randomized controlled trial. J Int Med Res. 2013;41(3):673–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang L, Gao J, Zeng L, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;133:9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, et al. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:906–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J, et al. Transumbilical single port versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:26.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Escobar PF, Fader AN, Paraiso MF, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive. 2009;16:589–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urogynecology and Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Advanced Surgical Specialties for WomenCarolinas Healthcare SystemCharlotteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of North Carolina-Chapel HillCharlotteUSA
  3. 3.Mercy Medical PlazaCharlotteUSA
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMercy Medical PlazaCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations