Laparoscopic and Robotic Radical Hysterectomy

  • Farr Nezhat
  • Maria Andrikopoulou
  • Ashley Bartalot


Although primary and secondary prevention has dramatically reduced the incidence of cervical cancer, it still remains the seventh most common malignant tumor worldwide and third in female population [1]. Traditionally, early stages of cervical cancer have been treated with radical abdominal hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, whereas more advanced stages with radiation and recently with chemoradiation.


Laparoscopic hysterectomy Radical hysterectomy 


  1. 1.
    Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(1):11–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nezhat C, Saberi N, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. JSLS. 2006;10(3):317–20.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS. 2008;12(3):227–37.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kruijdenberg CB, Van Den Einden LC, Hendriks JC, Zusterzeel PL, Bekkers RL. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120(3):334–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    PIVER MS, RUTLEDGE F, SMITH JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;44(2):265–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(3):297–303.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, Benigno BB, Welander CE. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(3):864–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nezhat C, Nezhat F. Videolaseroscopy for the treatment of upper, mid, and lower peritoneal cavity pathology. Annual Meeting of AAGL, November 1990.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Silfen S. Videolaparoscopy: the CO2 laser for advanced operative laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1991;18(3):585–604.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sert BM, Abeler VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection—case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006;27(5):531–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fanning J, Fenton B, Purohit M. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(6):649–e1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nezhat CR, Nezhat FR, Burrell MO, Ramirez CE, Welander C, Carrodeguas J, Nezhat CH. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic node dissection. J Gynecol Surg. 1993;9(2):105–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nezhat F, Mahdavi A, Nagarsheth NP. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(1):20–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pergialiotis V, Rodolakis A, Christakis D, Thomakos N, Vlachos G, Antsaklis A. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy: systematic review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(6):745–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR. Chapter 17.6: Schauta radical vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. In: Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Nezhat C, editors. Nezhat’s video-assisted and robotic-assisted laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. 4th ed: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 484–97.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, Fowler WC. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(4):357–e1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF. Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(1):113–e1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramirez PT, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, dos Reis R, Frumovitz M. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110(3):S21–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zakashansky K, Chuang L, Gretz H, Nagarsheth NP, Rahaman J, Nezhat FR. A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17(5):1075–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Campos LS, Limberger LF, Stein AT, Kalil AN. Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14(1):1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bogani G, Cromi A, Uccella S, Serati M, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(5):857–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cai J, Yang L, Dong W, Wang H, Xiong Z, Wang Z. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;132(1):29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cho JE, Nezhat F. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(6):669–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kucukmetin A, Biliatis I, Naik R, Bryant A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(10):CD006651.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cao T, Feng Y, Huang Q, Wan T, Liu J. Prognostic and safety roles in laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2015;25(12):990–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nam JH, Park JY, Kim DY, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):903–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim YT, Kim SW, Hyung WJ, Lee SJ, Nam EJ, Lee WJ. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108(2):312–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sert B, Aberler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot. 2007;3(3):224–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hoogendam JP, Verheijen RH, Wegner I, Zweemer RP. Oncological outcome and longterm complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(12):1538–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shazly SA, Murad MH, Dowdy SC, Gostout BS, Famuyide AO. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(2):457–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sert BM, Boggess JF, Ahmad S, Jackson AL, Stavitski NM, Dahl AA, Holloway RW. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(4):513–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mendivil AA, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN, Brown JV, Micha JP, Lopez KL, Goldstein BH. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a five year experience. Surg Oncol. 2016;25(1):66–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schemer KM, Levenback C, Ramirez PT. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(5):584–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Halliday D, Lau S, Vaknin Z, Deland C, Levental M, McNamara E, Gotlieb R, Kaufer R, How J, Cohen E, Gotlieb WH. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison of outcomes and cost. J Robot Surg. 2010;4(4):211–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Desille-Gbaguidi H, Hebert T, Paternotte-Villemagne J, Gaborit C, Rush E, Body G. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171(2):348–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, Burke WM, Lu YS, Lewin SN, Hershman DL. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(1):11–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farr Nezhat
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Maria Andrikopoulou
    • 4
  • Ashley Bartalot
    • 4
  1. 1.Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and ReproductiveMedicine School of Medicine, Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  3. 3.Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery and RoboticsWinthrop University HospitalMineolaUSA
  4. 4.NYU- Winthrop University HospitalMineolaUSA

Personalised recommendations